Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Narrow Construction of Public Building Exception: Exclusion of Transitory Conditions from Governmental Immunity

Narrow Construction of Public Building Exception: Exclusion of Transitory Conditions from Governmental Immunity

Date: Mar 24, 1992
Narrow Construction of Public Building Exception: Exclusion of Transitory Conditions from Governmental Immunity Introduction Wade v. Department of Corrections is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Arbitrators' Authority to Include Interest in Awards Under Broad Arbitration Clauses

Arbitrators' Authority to Include Interest in Awards Under Broad Arbitration Clauses

Date: Sep 18, 1991
Arbitrators' Authority to Include Interest in Awards Under Broad Arbitration Clauses Introduction In the landmark case of Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Brothers, Inc. (438 Mich. 488), decided by the...
Constitutional Validity of Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Search: Insights from PEOPLE v TOOHEY

Constitutional Validity of Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Search: Insights from PEOPLE v TOOHEY

Date: Aug 28, 1991
Constitutional Validity of Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Search: Insights from PEOPLE v TOOHEY Introduction PEOPLE v TOOHEY (438 Mich. 265) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying 'Sudden and Accidental': Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Clear Interpretation of Pollution-Exclusion Clauses in Liability Policies

Clarifying 'Sudden and Accidental': Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Clear Interpretation of Pollution-Exclusion Clauses in Liability Policies

Date: Aug 27, 1991
Clarifying 'Sudden and Accidental': Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Clear Interpretation of Pollution-Exclusion Clauses in Liability Policies Introduction In The Upjohn Company v. New Hampshire...
Employment-At-Will Reaffirmed: ROWE v MONTGOMERY WARD CO., INC.

Employment-At-Will Reaffirmed: ROWE v MONTGOMERY WARD CO., INC.

Date: Aug 1, 1991
Employment-At-Will Reaffirmed: ROWE v MONTGOMERY WARD CO., INC. Introduction ROWE v MONTGOMERY WARD CO., INCORPORATED, 437 Mich. 627 (1991), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Enforceability of Commission-Based Compensation in At-Will Employment: The Dumas v Auto Club Insurance Association Decision

Enforceability of Commission-Based Compensation in At-Will Employment: The Dumas v Auto Club Insurance Association Decision

Date: Aug 1, 1991
Enforceability of Commission-Based Compensation in At-Will Employment: The Dumas v Auto Club Insurance Association Decision Introduction The case of Dumas v Auto Club Insurance Association, decided...
Supreme Court of Michigan Validates MHSAA's Restitutive Regulations in Athletic Eligibility Dispute

Supreme Court of Michigan Validates MHSAA's Restitutive Regulations in Athletic Eligibility Dispute

Date: Mar 19, 1991
Supreme Court of Michigan Validates MHSAA's Restitutive Regulations in Athletic Eligibility Dispute Introduction The case Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Association (437...
Clarifying Appellate Review Standards for Factual Findings in Divorce Cases: Beason v. Beason

Clarifying Appellate Review Standards for Factual Findings in Divorce Cases: Beason v. Beason

Date: Sep 12, 1990
Clarifying Appellate Review Standards for Factual Findings in Divorce Cases: Beason v. Beason Introduction Beason v. Beason (435 Mich. 791) is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Proportionality in Appellate Sentencing Review: The Precedent in People v. Milbourn

Establishing Proportionality in Appellate Sentencing Review: The Precedent in People v. Milbourn

Date: Sep 12, 1990
Establishing Proportionality in Appellate Sentencing Review: The Precedent in People v. Milbourn Introduction People v. Milbourn, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on September 11, 1990, marks...
Lichon v. American Universal Insurance Company: Nolo Contendere Pleas and Insurance Recovery

Lichon v. American Universal Insurance Company: Nolo Contendere Pleas and Insurance Recovery

Date: Jul 31, 1990
Nolo Contendere Pleas and Insurance Recovery: An Analysis of Lichon v. American Universal Insurance Company Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan's decision in Lichon v. American Universal...
Reasonableness and Necessity of Medical Expenses Impact Insurer Liability Under Michigan No-Fault Act: Nasser v. Auto Club Insurance Association

Reasonableness and Necessity of Medical Expenses Impact Insurer Liability Under Michigan No-Fault Act: Nasser v. Auto Club Insurance Association

Date: Jun 27, 1990
Reasonableness and Necessity of Medical Expenses Impact Insurer Liability Under Michigan No-Fault Act Introduction Nasser v. Auto Club Insurance Association (435 Mich. 33, 1990) is a pivotal case in...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome: Analysis of PEOPLE v BECKLEY and PEOPLE v BADOUR

Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome: Analysis of PEOPLE v BECKLEY and PEOPLE v BADOUR

Date: Jun 6, 1990
Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome: Analysis of PEOPLE v BECKLEY and PEOPLE v BADOUR Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in the landmark case...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Jury Instructions on Involuntary Manslaughter and Self-Defense in Homicide Cases

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Jury Instructions on Involuntary Manslaughter and Self-Defense in Homicide Cases

Date: May 1, 1990
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Jury Instructions on Involuntary Manslaughter and Self-Defense in Homicide Cases Introduction The cases of People v. Heflin and PEOPLE v. LANDRUM...
Collateral Estoppel in Child Protective Proceedings: Insights from PEOPLE v. GATES

Collateral Estoppel in Child Protective Proceedings: Insights from PEOPLE v. GATES

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Collateral Estoppel in Child Protective Proceedings: Insights from PEOPLE v. GATES Introduction PEOPLE v. GATES, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 5, 1990, addresses the applicability...
Constructive and Joint Possession of Prohibited Firearms: Insights from People v Hill/Medley

Constructive and Joint Possession of Prohibited Firearms: Insights from People v Hill/Medley

Date: Sep 28, 1989
Constructive and Joint Possession of Prohibited Firearms: Insights from People v Hill/Medley Introduction People v Hill/Medley (433 Mich. 464) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Reaffirmation of Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Parental Rights Termination: IN RE MILLER Department of Social Services v. Miller

Reaffirmation of Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Parental Rights Termination: IN RE MILLER Department of Social Services v. Miller

Date: Aug 31, 1989
Reaffirmation of Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Parental Rights Termination: IN RE MILLER Department of Social Services v. Miller Introduction The case of IN RE MILLER Department of Social...
Broad Interpretation of 'An Insured' and the Two-Part Objective Test for Coverage Exclusions Established in Allstate v Freeman and Metropolitan v DiCicco

Broad Interpretation of 'An Insured' and the Two-Part Objective Test for Coverage Exclusions Established in Allstate v Freeman and Metropolitan v DiCicco

Date: Jul 19, 1989
Broad Interpretation of 'An Insured' and the Two-Part Objective Test for Coverage Exclusions Established in Allstate v Freeman and Metropolitan v DiCicco Introduction The landmark cases of Allstate...
Preserving Governmental Immunity in Recreational Facility Operations: Insights from RICHARDSON v JACKSON COUNTY

Preserving Governmental Immunity in Recreational Facility Operations: Insights from RICHARDSON v JACKSON COUNTY

Date: Jun 7, 1989
Preserving Governmental Immunity in Recreational Facility Operations: Insights from RICHARDSON v JACKSON COUNTY Introduction RICHARDSON v JACKSON COUNTY is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
STOREY v. MEIJER, INC.: Limiting Collateral Estoppel in Employment Disputes

STOREY v. MEIJER, INC.: Limiting Collateral Estoppel in Employment Disputes

Date: Sep 20, 1988
STOREY v. MEIJER, INC.: Limiting Collateral Estoppel in Employment Disputes Introduction STOREY v. MEIJER, INC. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, adjudicated on September 19,...
Revisiting Voluntariness: Michigan's Stance on Prearraignment Delays in Confession Admissibility

Revisiting Voluntariness: Michigan's Stance on Prearraignment Delays in Confession Admissibility

Date: Sep 17, 1988
Revisiting Voluntariness: Michigan's Stance on Prearraignment Delays in Confession Admissibility Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan's 1988 decision in People v Cipriano, Dean, and Harrison...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert