Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Senters v Ottawa Savings Bank: Clarifying Redemption Under Foreclosure by Advertisement Introduction Senters v Ottawa Savings Bank, FSB, 443 Mich. 45 (1993) is a pivotal case in Michigan real estate...
Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Armed Robbery: Analysis of PEOPLE v. JOLLY Introduction PEOPLE v. JOLLY, 442 Mich. 458 (1993), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Radtke v Everett: Upholding the Objective Reasonable Person Standard in Hostile Work Environment Claims under the Michigan Civil Rights Act Introduction Radtke v Everett (442 Mich. 368, 1993) is a...
Significant Manner Causation and Substantial Evidence in Workers' Compensation: FARRINGTON v. TOTAL PETROLEUM, Inc. Introduction FARRINGTON v. TOTAL PETROLEUM, Inc. (442 Mich. 201) is a seminal case...
Procedural Due Process in Child Protective Proceedings: Insights from IN RE BROCK Introduction IN RE BROCK (DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. BROCK) is a landmark 1993 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Equitable Division of Marital Assets: Insights from SANDS v SANDS Introduction SANDS v SANDS (442 Mich. 30), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 23, 1993, is a pivotal case in the realm...
Emergency Aid Exception Clarified in People v Davis Introduction People v Davis (442 Mich. 1) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 2, 1993. The case centers around...
Implied Repeal of Administrative Board’s Transfer Powers Rejected: Insights from HOUSE SPEAKER v STATE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD Introduction In the landmark case HOUSE SPEAKER v STATE ADMINISTRATIVE...
Reaffirming Limits on Third-Party Standing in Child Custody Cases: BOWIE v. ARDER DUONG v. HONG Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan's decision in BOWIE v. ARDER DUONG v. HONG (441 Mich. 23,...
Insanity and Insurance Exclusions: Intent and Expectation in Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Churchman Introduction Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Churchman is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Constructive Possession Evidence in Drug Crimes: A Commentary on PEOPLE v WOLFE Introduction The case of PEOPLE v WOLFE (440 Mich. 508), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Property Depreciation and Nuisance: ADKINS v THOMAS SOLVENT COMPANY Introduction ADKINS v. THOMAS SOLVENT COMPANY, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on July 28, 1992, is a pivotal case...
Waiver of Statutory Probation Report Privilege in Civil Defamation Actions: Howe v Detroit Free Press Introduction Howe v Detroit Free Press, Inc. is a pivotal 1992 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Balancing Fault in Equitable Division of Marital Assets – Sparks v Sparks Introduction Sparks v Sparks (440 Mich. 141), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on June 30, 1992, addresses the...
Affirming the 'No Duty to Warn of Open and Obvious Dangers' in Premises Liability: Analysis of Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corporation Introduction Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corporation is...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Proportionality in Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Strikes Down Mandatory Life Without Parole for Cocaine Possession Introduction In People v. Bullock and People v....
Arbitration Panels' Authority to Apply Statute of Limitations Confirmed in NIELSEN v. BUTTERWORTH HOSPital Introduction NIELSEN v. BUTTERWORTH HOSPital is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Prospective Application of Extended Statute of Limitations in PEOPLE v. RUSSO Introduction PEOPLE v. RUSSO (439 Mich. 584) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, delivered on June...
Adoption of the Economic Loss Doctrine under the UCC in NEIBARGER v UNIVERSAL COOPERATIVES, INC and HOUGHTON v ALFA-LAVAL Introduction In the consolidated cases of NEIBARGER v UNIVERSAL COOPERATIVES,...
Lienholder's Independent Recovery Rights Affirmed under Standard Loss Payable Clauses Introduction Foremost Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance Company (439 Mich. 378), decided by the Supreme...