Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Limits on Third-Party Standing in Child Custody Cases: BOWIE v. ARDER DUONG v. HONG

Reaffirming Limits on Third-Party Standing in Child Custody Cases: BOWIE v. ARDER DUONG v. HONG

Date: Sep 23, 1992
Reaffirming Limits on Third-Party Standing in Child Custody Cases: BOWIE v. ARDER DUONG v. HONG Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan's decision in BOWIE v. ARDER DUONG v. HONG (441 Mich. 23,...
Insanity and Insurance Exclusions: Intent and Expectation in Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Churchman

Insanity and Insurance Exclusions: Intent and Expectation in Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Churchman

Date: Sep 10, 1992
Insanity and Insurance Exclusions: Intent and Expectation in Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Churchman Introduction Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Churchman is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Constructive Possession Evidence in Drug Crimes: A Commentary on PEOPLE v WOLFE

Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Constructive Possession Evidence in Drug Crimes: A Commentary on PEOPLE v WOLFE

Date: Sep 1, 1992
Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Constructive Possession Evidence in Drug Crimes: A Commentary on PEOPLE v WOLFE Introduction The case of PEOPLE v WOLFE (440 Mich. 508), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Property Depreciation and Nuisance: ADKINS v THOMAS SOLVENT COMPANY Analysis

Property Depreciation and Nuisance: ADKINS v THOMAS SOLVENT COMPANY Analysis

Date: Jul 29, 1992
Property Depreciation and Nuisance: ADKINS v THOMAS SOLVENT COMPANY Introduction ADKINS v. THOMAS SOLVENT COMPANY, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on July 28, 1992, is a pivotal case...
Waiver of Statutory Probation Report Privilege in Civil Defamation Actions: Howe v Detroit Free Press

Waiver of Statutory Probation Report Privilege in Civil Defamation Actions: Howe v Detroit Free Press

Date: Jul 15, 1992
Waiver of Statutory Probation Report Privilege in Civil Defamation Actions: Howe v Detroit Free Press Introduction Howe v Detroit Free Press, Inc. is a pivotal 1992 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Balancing Fault in Equitable Division of Marital Assets – Sparks v Sparks

Balancing Fault in Equitable Division of Marital Assets – Sparks v Sparks

Date: Jul 1, 1992
Balancing Fault in Equitable Division of Marital Assets – Sparks v Sparks Introduction Sparks v Sparks (440 Mich. 141), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on June 30, 1992, addresses the...
Affirming the 'No Duty to Warn of Open and Obvious Dangers' in Premises Liability: Analysis of Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corporation

Affirming the 'No Duty to Warn of Open and Obvious Dangers' in Premises Liability: Analysis of Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corporation

Date: Jun 24, 1992
Affirming the 'No Duty to Warn of Open and Obvious Dangers' in Premises Liability: Analysis of Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corporation Introduction Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corporation is...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Proportionality in Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Strikes Down Mandatory Life Without Parole for Cocaine Possession

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Proportionality in Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Strikes Down Mandatory Life Without Parole for Cocaine Possession

Date: Jun 17, 1992
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Proportionality in Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Strikes Down Mandatory Life Without Parole for Cocaine Possession Introduction In People v. Bullock and People v....
Arbitration Panels' Authority to Apply Statute of Limitations Confirmed in NIELSEN v. BUTTERWORTH HOSPital

Arbitration Panels' Authority to Apply Statute of Limitations Confirmed in NIELSEN v. BUTTERWORTH HOSPital

Date: Jun 17, 1992
Arbitration Panels' Authority to Apply Statute of Limitations Confirmed in NIELSEN v. BUTTERWORTH HOSPital Introduction NIELSEN v. BUTTERWORTH HOSPital is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Prospective Application of Extended Statute of Limitations in PEOPLE v. RUSSO

Prospective Application of Extended Statute of Limitations in PEOPLE v. RUSSO

Date: Jun 3, 1992
Prospective Application of Extended Statute of Limitations in PEOPLE v. RUSSO Introduction PEOPLE v. RUSSO (439 Mich. 584) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, delivered on June...
Adoption of the Economic Loss Doctrine under the UCC in NEIBARGER v UNIVERSAL COOPERATIVES and HOUGHTON v ALFA-LAVAL

Adoption of the Economic Loss Doctrine under the UCC in NEIBARGER v UNIVERSAL COOPERATIVES and HOUGHTON v ALFA-LAVAL

Date: May 21, 1992
Adoption of the Economic Loss Doctrine under the UCC in NEIBARGER v UNIVERSAL COOPERATIVES, INC and HOUGHTON v ALFA-LAVAL Introduction In the consolidated cases of NEIBARGER v UNIVERSAL COOPERATIVES,...
Lienholder's Independent Recovery Rights Affirmed under Standard Loss Payable Clauses

Lienholder's Independent Recovery Rights Affirmed under Standard Loss Payable Clauses

Date: May 16, 1992
Lienholder's Independent Recovery Rights Affirmed under Standard Loss Payable Clauses Introduction Foremost Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance Company (439 Mich. 378), decided by the Supreme...
Narrow Construction of Public Building Exception: Exclusion of Transitory Conditions from Governmental Immunity

Narrow Construction of Public Building Exception: Exclusion of Transitory Conditions from Governmental Immunity

Date: Mar 24, 1992
Narrow Construction of Public Building Exception: Exclusion of Transitory Conditions from Governmental Immunity Introduction Wade v. Department of Corrections is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Arbitrators' Authority to Include Interest in Awards Under Broad Arbitration Clauses

Arbitrators' Authority to Include Interest in Awards Under Broad Arbitration Clauses

Date: Sep 18, 1991
Arbitrators' Authority to Include Interest in Awards Under Broad Arbitration Clauses Introduction In the landmark case of Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Brothers, Inc. (438 Mich. 488), decided by the...
Constitutional Validity of Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Search: Insights from PEOPLE v TOOHEY

Constitutional Validity of Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Search: Insights from PEOPLE v TOOHEY

Date: Aug 28, 1991
Constitutional Validity of Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Search: Insights from PEOPLE v TOOHEY Introduction PEOPLE v TOOHEY (438 Mich. 265) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying 'Sudden and Accidental': Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Clear Interpretation of Pollution-Exclusion Clauses in Liability Policies

Clarifying 'Sudden and Accidental': Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Clear Interpretation of Pollution-Exclusion Clauses in Liability Policies

Date: Aug 27, 1991
Clarifying 'Sudden and Accidental': Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Clear Interpretation of Pollution-Exclusion Clauses in Liability Policies Introduction In The Upjohn Company v. New Hampshire...
Employment-At-Will Reaffirmed: ROWE v MONTGOMERY WARD CO., INC.

Employment-At-Will Reaffirmed: ROWE v MONTGOMERY WARD CO., INC.

Date: Aug 1, 1991
Employment-At-Will Reaffirmed: ROWE v MONTGOMERY WARD CO., INC. Introduction ROWE v MONTGOMERY WARD CO., INCORPORATED, 437 Mich. 627 (1991), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Enforceability of Commission-Based Compensation in At-Will Employment: The Dumas v Auto Club Insurance Association Decision

Enforceability of Commission-Based Compensation in At-Will Employment: The Dumas v Auto Club Insurance Association Decision

Date: Aug 1, 1991
Enforceability of Commission-Based Compensation in At-Will Employment: The Dumas v Auto Club Insurance Association Decision Introduction The case of Dumas v Auto Club Insurance Association, decided...
Supreme Court of Michigan Validates MHSAA's Restitutive Regulations in Athletic Eligibility Dispute

Supreme Court of Michigan Validates MHSAA's Restitutive Regulations in Athletic Eligibility Dispute

Date: Mar 19, 1991
Supreme Court of Michigan Validates MHSAA's Restitutive Regulations in Athletic Eligibility Dispute Introduction The case Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Association (437...
Clarifying Appellate Review Standards for Factual Findings in Divorce Cases: Beason v. Beason

Clarifying Appellate Review Standards for Factual Findings in Divorce Cases: Beason v. Beason

Date: Sep 12, 1990
Clarifying Appellate Review Standards for Factual Findings in Divorce Cases: Beason v. Beason Introduction Beason v. Beason (435 Mich. 791) is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert