Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Causation Standards in Product Liability: SKINNER v. SQUARE D COmpany

Reaffirming Causation Standards in Product Liability: SKINNER v. SQUARE D COmpany

Date: May 18, 1994
Reaffirming Causation Standards in Product Liability: SKINNER v. SQUARE D COmpany Introduction SKINNER v. SQUARE D COmpany, 445 Mich. 153 (1994), addresses pivotal issues in products liability law,...
Rasheed v. Chrysler: Establishing Procedural Standards for Reinstatement and Damage Mitigation under the Michigan Civil Rights Act

Rasheed v. Chrysler: Establishing Procedural Standards for Reinstatement and Damage Mitigation under the Michigan Civil Rights Act

Date: May 18, 1994
Rasheed v. Chrysler: Establishing Procedural Standards for Reinstatement and Damage Mitigation under the Michigan Civil Rights Act Introduction Rasheed v. Chrysler Corporation, adjudicated by the...
Marquis v. Hartford Accident Indemnity: Clarifying "Work Loss" Under Michigan No-Fault Insurance Act

Marquis v. Hartford Accident Indemnity: Clarifying "Work Loss" Under Michigan No-Fault Insurance Act

Date: Mar 16, 1994
Marquis v. Hartford Accident Indemnity: Clarifying "Work Loss" Under Michigan No-Fault Insurance Act Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in Marquis v. Hartford Accident Indemnity (444 Mich....
Enforcing Statutes of Limitations in Legal Malpractice: Insights from GEBHARDT v. O'ROURKE

Enforcing Statutes of Limitations in Legal Malpractice: Insights from GEBHARDT v. O'ROURKE

Date: Jan 26, 1994
Enforcing Statutes of Limitations in Legal Malpractice: Insights from GEBHARDT v. O'ROURKE Introduction GEBHARDT v. O'ROURKE, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on January 25, 1994, is a...
Enhancing Transparency in Public University Governance: Insights from Booth Newspapers Inc. v. University of Michigan Board of Regents

Enhancing Transparency in Public University Governance: Insights from Booth Newspapers Inc. v. University of Michigan Board of Regents

Date: Sep 29, 1993
Enhancing Transparency in Public University Governance: Insights from Booth Newspapers Inc. v. University of Michigan Board of Regents Introduction The case of Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. University of...
Establishing Just Cause in Wrongful Discharge: Insights from ROOD v GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION SCHIPPERS v SPX CORPORATION

Establishing Just Cause in Wrongful Discharge: Insights from ROOD v GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION SCHIPPERS v SPX CORPORATION

Date: Sep 22, 1993
Establishing Just Cause in Wrongful Discharge: Insights from ROOD v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION and SCHIPPERS v. SPX CORPORATION Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in the landmark decision...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Other Acts Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: Analysis of PEOPLE v VANDERVLIET

Clarifying the Admissibility of Other Acts Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: Analysis of PEOPLE v VANDERVLIET

Date: Sep 22, 1993
Clarifying the Admissibility of Other Acts Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: Analysis of PEOPLE v VANDERVLIET Introduction PEOPLE v VANDERVLIET, 444 Mich. 52 (1993), is a pivotal decision by...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Discovery Rule in Pharmaceutical Product Liability Cases Involving Latent Injuries

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Discovery Rule in Pharmaceutical Product Liability Cases Involving Latent Injuries

Date: Sep 22, 1993
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Discovery Rule in Pharmaceutical Product Liability Cases Involving Latent Injuries Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court, in its 1993 decision of Moll v Abbott...
Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.: Affirming Duty of Care for Electric Utilities

Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.: Affirming Duty of Care for Electric Utilities

Date: Sep 1, 1993
Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.: Affirming Duty of Care for Electric Utilities Introduction Schultz v. Consumers Power Company is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on August 31,...
People v. Kurylczyk: Clarifying Counsel Requirements and Assessing Suggestiveness in Pretrial Identifications

People v. Kurylczyk: Clarifying Counsel Requirements and Assessing Suggestiveness in Pretrial Identifications

Date: Aug 21, 1993
People v. Kurylczyk: Clarifying Counsel Requirements and Assessing Suggestiveness in Pretrial Identifications Introduction People v. Kurylczyk (443 Mich. 289), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Judicial Participation in Sentence Agreements: Insights from PEOPLE v. COBBS (1993)

Judicial Participation in Sentence Agreements: Insights from PEOPLE v. COBBS (1993)

Date: Aug 18, 1993
Judicial Participation in Sentence Agreements: Insights from PEOPLE v. COBBS (1993) Introduction PEOPLE v. COBBS, 443 Mich. 276 (1993), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Governmental Duty to Verify Payment Bonds in Public Works Projects: Kammer Asphalt Paving Co. v. East China Township Schools

Governmental Duty to Verify Payment Bonds in Public Works Projects: Kammer Asphalt Paving Co. v. East China Township Schools

Date: Aug 4, 1993
Governmental Duty to Verify Payment Bonds in Public Works Projects Kammer Asphalt Paving Co., Inc. v. East China Township Schools Supreme Court of Michigan Decided: August 3, 1993 Introduction The...
Senters v Ottawa Savings Bank: Clarifying Redemption Under Foreclosure by Advertisement

Senters v Ottawa Savings Bank: Clarifying Redemption Under Foreclosure by Advertisement

Date: Jul 15, 1993
Senters v Ottawa Savings Bank: Clarifying Redemption Under Foreclosure by Advertisement Introduction Senters v Ottawa Savings Bank, FSB, 443 Mich. 45 (1993) is a pivotal case in Michigan real estate...
Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Armed Robbery: Analysis of PEOPLE v. JOLLY

Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Armed Robbery: Analysis of PEOPLE v. JOLLY

Date: Jun 23, 1993
Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Armed Robbery: Analysis of PEOPLE v. JOLLY Introduction PEOPLE v. JOLLY, 442 Mich. 458 (1993), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Radtke v Everett: Upholding the Objective Reasonable Person Standard in Hostile Work Environment Claims under the Michigan Civil Rights Act

Radtke v Everett: Upholding the Objective Reasonable Person Standard in Hostile Work Environment Claims under the Michigan Civil Rights Act

Date: Jun 3, 1993
Radtke v Everett: Upholding the Objective Reasonable Person Standard in Hostile Work Environment Claims under the Michigan Civil Rights Act Introduction Radtke v Everett (442 Mich. 368, 1993) is a...
Significant Manner Causation and Substantial Evidence in Workers' Compensation: FARRINGTON v. TOTAL PETROLEUM, Inc.

Significant Manner Causation and Substantial Evidence in Workers' Compensation: FARRINGTON v. TOTAL PETROLEUM, Inc.

Date: May 26, 1993
Significant Manner Causation and Substantial Evidence in Workers' Compensation: FARRINGTON v. TOTAL PETROLEUM, Inc. Introduction FARRINGTON v. TOTAL PETROLEUM, Inc. (442 Mich. 201) is a seminal case...
Procedural Due Process in Child Protective Proceedings: Insights from IN RE BROCK

Procedural Due Process in Child Protective Proceedings: Insights from IN RE BROCK

Date: Apr 15, 1993
Procedural Due Process in Child Protective Proceedings: Insights from IN RE BROCK Introduction IN RE BROCK (DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. BROCK) is a landmark 1993 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Equitable Division of Marital Assets: Insights from SANDS v SANDS

Equitable Division of Marital Assets: Insights from SANDS v SANDS

Date: Mar 24, 1993
Equitable Division of Marital Assets: Insights from SANDS v SANDS Introduction SANDS v SANDS (442 Mich. 30), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 23, 1993, is a pivotal case in the realm...
Emergency Aid Exception Clarified in People v Davis

Emergency Aid Exception Clarified in People v Davis

Date: Mar 3, 1993
Emergency Aid Exception Clarified in People v Davis Introduction People v Davis (442 Mich. 1) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 2, 1993. The case centers around...
Implied Repeal of Administrative Board’s Transfer Powers Rejected: Insights from HOUSE SPEAKER v STATE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD

Implied Repeal of Administrative Board’s Transfer Powers Rejected: Insights from HOUSE SPEAKER v STATE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD

Date: Jan 16, 1993
Implied Repeal of Administrative Board’s Transfer Powers Rejected: Insights from HOUSE SPEAKER v STATE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD Introduction In the landmark case HOUSE SPEAKER v STATE ADMINISTRATIVE...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert