Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty: SPENCE v. Three Rivers Builders Masonry Supply, Inc. Commentary

Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty: SPENCE v. Three Rivers Builders Masonry Supply, Inc. Commentary

Date: Jun 13, 1958
Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty: SPENCE v. Three Rivers Builders Masonry Supply, Inc. Commentary Introduction SPENCE v. THREE RIVERS BUILDERS MASONRY SUPPLY, INC. is a landmark case decided...
Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Attorneys in Defamation Cases: An Analysis of TIMMIS v. BENNETT (1958)

Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Attorneys in Defamation Cases: An Analysis of TIMMIS v. BENNETT (1958)

Date: Apr 16, 1958
Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Attorneys in Defamation Cases: An Analysis of TIMMIS v. BENNETT (1958) Introduction Timmis v. Bennett is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Affirming Municipal Authority: Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield Hills

Affirming Municipal Authority: Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield Hills

Date: Nov 27, 1957
Affirming Municipal Authority: Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield Hills Introduction The case of Brae Burn, Inc., v. City of Bloomfield Hills. Robinson (350 Mich. 425), adjudicated by the Supreme...

        Establishing Liability for Mental Suffering in Breach of Medical Contract: Stewart v. Rudner

Establishing Liability for Mental Suffering in Breach of Medical Contract: Stewart v. Rudner

Date: Sep 5, 1957
Establishing Liability for Mental Suffering in Breach of Medical Contract: Stewart v. Rudner Introduction Stewart v. Rudner is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG: Defining Public Nuisance Standards in Zoning Ordinances

TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG: Defining Public Nuisance Standards in Zoning Ordinances

Date: May 18, 1957
TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG: Defining Public Nuisance Standards in Zoning Ordinances Introduction In the landmark case of TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG, decided on May 17, 1957, by the Supreme...
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Conjectural Cause: An Analysis of Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company

Res Ipsa Loquitur and Conjectural Cause: An Analysis of Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company

Date: Dec 29, 1956
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Conjectural Cause: An Analysis of Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company Introduction KAMINSKI v. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, 347 Mich. 417 (1956), is a...
Hart v. Ludwig: Reinforcing the Distinction Between Tort and Contractual Nonfeasance

Hart v. Ludwig: Reinforcing the Distinction Between Tort and Contractual Nonfeasance

Date: Dec 29, 1956
Hart v. Ludwig: Reinforcing the Distinction Between Tort and Contractual Nonfeasance Introduction Hart v. Ludwig, decided on December 28, 1956, by the Supreme Court of Michigan, addresses a pivotal...
Statutory Interpretation of 'Benefit Rights' and Exhaustion Under the Michigan Employment Security Act: Melia v. Employment Security Commission

Statutory Interpretation of 'Benefit Rights' and Exhaustion Under the Michigan Employment Security Act: Melia v. Employment Security Commission

Date: Sep 5, 1956
Statutory Interpretation of 'Benefit Rights' and Exhaustion Under the Michigan Employment Security Act: Melia v. Employment Security Commission Introduction Melia v. Employment Security Commission is...
Admissibility of Prior Acts as Evidence of Intent in Second-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. DAVIS (1955)

Admissibility of Prior Acts as Evidence of Intent in Second-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. DAVIS (1955)

Date: Oct 4, 1955
Admissibility of Prior Acts as Evidence of Intent in Second-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. DAVIS (1955) Introduction PEOPLE v. DAVIS, 343 Mich. 348 (1955), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Implied Statutory Repeal and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission

Implied Statutory Repeal and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission

Date: Jan 8, 1946
Implied Statutory Repeal and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission Introduction Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission is a pivotal case decided by the...
Absolute Privilege in Official Communications: POWERS v. VAUGHAN

Absolute Privilege in Official Communications: POWERS v. VAUGHAN

Date: Oct 9, 1945
Absolute Privilege in Official Communications: POWERS v. VAUGHAN Introduction POWERS v. VAUGHAN, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on October 8, 1945, is a pivotal case addressing the...
Establishing Owner's Rights in Scavenger Sales: Piotrowski v. State Land Office Board

Establishing Owner's Rights in Scavenger Sales: Piotrowski v. State Land Office Board

Date: Jun 11, 1942
Establishing Owner's Rights in Scavenger Sales: Piotrowski v. State Land Office Board Introduction Piotrowski v. State Land Office Board is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Comprehensive Commentary on Cady v. City of Detroit: Upholding Municipal Police Power in Zoning Ordinances

Comprehensive Commentary on Cady v. City of Detroit: Upholding Municipal Police Power in Zoning Ordinances

Date: Jul 7, 1939
Upholding Municipal Police Power in Zoning Ordinances: Insights from Cady v. City of Detroit Introduction Cady v. City of Detroit, 289 Mich. 499 (1939), is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Boyer-Campbell Co. v. Fry: Defining Retail Sales in Michigan's General Sales Tax Act

Boyer-Campbell Co. v. Fry: Defining Retail Sales in Michigan's General Sales Tax Act

Date: Apr 10, 1935
Boyer-Campbell Co. v. Fry: Defining Retail Sales in Michigan's General Sales Tax Act Introduction Boyer-Campbell Co. v. Fry is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on April 9,...
Impeachment of Witnesses and the Right to Disclosure: Insights from People v. Dellabonda

Impeachment of Witnesses and the Right to Disclosure: Insights from People v. Dellabonda

Date: Dec 20, 1933
Impeachment of Witnesses and the Right to Disclosure: Insights from People v. Dellabonda Introduction The case of People v. Dellabonda, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on December 19,...
Revival of Barred Mortgages through Payment: Hiscock v. Hiscock

Revival of Barred Mortgages through Payment: Hiscock v. Hiscock

Date: Jan 5, 1932
Revival of Barred Mortgages through Payment: Hiscock v. Hiscock Introduction Hiscock v. Hiscock (257 Mich. 16), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on January 4, 1932, is a seminal case...
Limitation of Liability for Motor Vehicle Operators: NAUDZIUS v. LAHR (1931)

Limitation of Liability for Motor Vehicle Operators: NAUDZIUS v. LAHR (1931)

Date: Jan 24, 1931
Limitation of Liability for Motor Vehicle Operators: NAUDZIUS v. LAHR (1931) Introduction NAUDZIUS v. LAHR is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on January 23, 1931. The case...
RAYMOND v. CROLL: Establishing the Burden of Proof for Malice in Qualified Privilege Slander

RAYMOND v. CROLL: Establishing the Burden of Proof for Malice in Qualified Privilege Slander

Date: Dec 23, 1925
RAYMOND v. CROLL: Establishing the Burden of Proof for Malice in Qualified Privilege Slander Introduction The case of Raymond v. Croll (233 Mich. 268), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Enforceability of Minimum Royalty Provisions in Exclusive Manufacturing Contracts: McIntosh v. Groomes

Enforceability of Minimum Royalty Provisions in Exclusive Manufacturing Contracts: McIntosh v. Groomes

Date: Jun 3, 1924
Enforceability of Minimum Royalty Provisions in Exclusive Manufacturing Contracts: McIntosh v. Groomes Introduction The case of McIntosh v. Groomes, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on June...
Gross Negligence and Contributory Negligence: Insights from Gibbard v. Cursan

Gross Negligence and Contributory Negligence: Insights from Gibbard v. Cursan

Date: Dec 20, 1923
Gross Negligence and Contributory Negligence: Insights from Gibbard v. Cursan Introduction Gibbard v. Cursan is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on December 19, 1923. The...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert