Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty: SPENCE v. Three Rivers Builders Masonry Supply, Inc. Commentary Introduction SPENCE v. THREE RIVERS BUILDERS MASONRY SUPPLY, INC. is a landmark case decided...
Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Attorneys in Defamation Cases: An Analysis of TIMMIS v. BENNETT (1958) Introduction Timmis v. Bennett is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Affirming Municipal Authority: Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield Hills Introduction The case of Brae Burn, Inc., v. City of Bloomfield Hills. Robinson (350 Mich. 425), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Establishing Liability for Mental Suffering in Breach of Medical Contract: Stewart v. Rudner Introduction Stewart v. Rudner is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG: Defining Public Nuisance Standards in Zoning Ordinances Introduction In the landmark case of TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG, decided on May 17, 1957, by the Supreme...
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Conjectural Cause: An Analysis of Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company Introduction KAMINSKI v. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, 347 Mich. 417 (1956), is a...
Hart v. Ludwig: Reinforcing the Distinction Between Tort and Contractual Nonfeasance Introduction Hart v. Ludwig, decided on December 28, 1956, by the Supreme Court of Michigan, addresses a pivotal...
Statutory Interpretation of 'Benefit Rights' and Exhaustion Under the Michigan Employment Security Act: Melia v. Employment Security Commission Introduction Melia v. Employment Security Commission is...
Admissibility of Prior Acts as Evidence of Intent in Second-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. DAVIS (1955) Introduction PEOPLE v. DAVIS, 343 Mich. 348 (1955), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Implied Statutory Repeal and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission Introduction Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission is a pivotal case decided by the...
Absolute Privilege in Official Communications: POWERS v. VAUGHAN Introduction POWERS v. VAUGHAN, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on October 8, 1945, is a pivotal case addressing the...
Establishing Owner's Rights in Scavenger Sales: Piotrowski v. State Land Office Board Introduction Piotrowski v. State Land Office Board is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Upholding Municipal Police Power in Zoning Ordinances: Insights from Cady v. City of Detroit Introduction Cady v. City of Detroit, 289 Mich. 499 (1939), is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Boyer-Campbell Co. v. Fry: Defining Retail Sales in Michigan's General Sales Tax Act Introduction Boyer-Campbell Co. v. Fry is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on April 9,...
Impeachment of Witnesses and the Right to Disclosure: Insights from People v. Dellabonda Introduction The case of People v. Dellabonda, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on December 19,...
Revival of Barred Mortgages through Payment: Hiscock v. Hiscock Introduction Hiscock v. Hiscock (257 Mich. 16), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on January 4, 1932, is a seminal case...
Limitation of Liability for Motor Vehicle Operators: NAUDZIUS v. LAHR (1931) Introduction NAUDZIUS v. LAHR is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on January 23, 1931. The case...
RAYMOND v. CROLL: Establishing the Burden of Proof for Malice in Qualified Privilege Slander Introduction The case of Raymond v. Croll (233 Mich. 268), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Enforceability of Minimum Royalty Provisions in Exclusive Manufacturing Contracts: McIntosh v. Groomes Introduction The case of McIntosh v. Groomes, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on June...
Gross Negligence and Contributory Negligence: Insights from Gibbard v. Cursan Introduction Gibbard v. Cursan is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on December 19, 1923. The...