Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Separate Determination of Voluntariness of Confessions: Impact of PEOPLE v. WALKER

Separate Determination of Voluntariness of Confessions: Impact of PEOPLE v. WALKER

Date: Jan 6, 1965
Separate Determination of Voluntariness of Confessions: Impact of PEOPLE v. WALKER Introduction PEOPLE v. WALKER, 374 Mich. 331 (1965), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Negligent Entrustment of Automobiles Affirmed Despite Statutory Liability: PERIN v. PEULER

Negligent Entrustment of Automobiles Affirmed Despite Statutory Liability: PERIN v. PEULER

Date: Sep 3, 1964
Negligent Entrustment of Automobiles Affirmed Despite Statutory Liability: PERIN v. PEULER Introduction PERIN v. PEULER is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on September...
Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Defamation: The Nuyen v. Slater Precedent

Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Defamation: The Nuyen v. Slater Precedent

Date: Apr 7, 1964
Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Defamation: The Nuyen v. Slater Precedent Introduction Nuyen v. Slater, 372 Mich. 654 (1964), is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Ensuring Voluntariness in Guilty Pleas: Analysis of In re VALLE (364 Mich. 471)

Ensuring Voluntariness in Guilty Pleas: Analysis of In re VALLE (364 Mich. 471)

Date: Sep 24, 1961
Ensuring Voluntariness in Guilty Pleas: Analysis of In re VALLE (364 Mich. 471) 1. Introduction In re VALLE (364 Mich. 471), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on September 23, 1961, addresses...
Williams v. City of Detroit: Upholding Governmental Immunity and Separation of Powers

Williams v. City of Detroit: Upholding Governmental Immunity and Separation of Powers

Date: Sep 23, 1961
Williams v. City of Detroit: Upholding Governmental Immunity and Separation of Powers Introduction Williams v. City of Detroit (364 Mich. 231, 1961) is a seminal case in Michigan's legal history,...
Abolition of Charitable Immunity for Nonprofit Hospitals in Michigan

Abolition of Charitable Immunity for Nonprofit Hospitals in Michigan

Date: Sep 16, 1960
Abolition of Charitable Immunity for Nonprofit Hospitals in Michigan Introduction Parker v. Port Huron Hospital is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, rendered on September 15,...
Recognition of Spousal Loss of Consortium Claims in Michigan Law

Recognition of Spousal Loss of Consortium Claims in Michigan Law

Date: Feb 26, 1960
Recognition of Spousal Loss of Consortium Claims in Michigan Law Introduction Montgomery v. Stephan is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on February 25, 1960. The case involves...
Manufacturer Liability and the Scope of Duty to Warn: An Analysis of Comstock v. General Motors Corporation

Manufacturer Liability and the Scope of Duty to Warn: An Analysis of Comstock v. General Motors Corporation

Date: Nov 26, 1959
Manufacturer Liability and the Scope of Duty to Warn: An Analysis of Comstock v. General Motors Corporation Introduction Comstock v. General Motors Corporation, 358 Mich. 163 (1959), adjudicated by...
Division of Municipal Assets and Liabilities in Annexation: Insights from CITY OF LANSING v. TOWNSHIP OF LANSING

Division of Municipal Assets and Liabilities in Annexation: Insights from CITY OF LANSING v. TOWNSHIP OF LANSING

Date: Jul 14, 1959
Division of Municipal Assets and Liabilities in Annexation: Insights from CITY OF LANSING v. TOWNSHIP OF LANSING Introduction CITY OF LANSING v. TOWNSHIP OF LANSING, 356 Mich. 641 (1959), is a...
Mitcham v. City of Detroit: Establishing Circumstantial Negligence in Public Transportation Cases

Mitcham v. City of Detroit: Establishing Circumstantial Negligence in Public Transportation Cases

Date: Jan 13, 1959
Mitcham v. City of Detroit: Establishing Circumstantial Negligence in Public Transportation Cases Introduction Mitcham v. City of Detroit, 355 Mich. 182 (1959), is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty: SPENCE v. Three Rivers Builders Masonry Supply, Inc. Commentary

Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty: SPENCE v. Three Rivers Builders Masonry Supply, Inc. Commentary

Date: Jun 13, 1958
Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty: SPENCE v. Three Rivers Builders Masonry Supply, Inc. Commentary Introduction SPENCE v. THREE RIVERS BUILDERS MASONRY SUPPLY, INC. is a landmark case decided...
Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Attorneys in Defamation Cases: An Analysis of TIMMIS v. BENNETT (1958)

Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Attorneys in Defamation Cases: An Analysis of TIMMIS v. BENNETT (1958)

Date: Apr 16, 1958
Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Attorneys in Defamation Cases: An Analysis of TIMMIS v. BENNETT (1958) Introduction Timmis v. Bennett is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Affirming Municipal Authority: Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield Hills

Affirming Municipal Authority: Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield Hills

Date: Nov 27, 1957
Affirming Municipal Authority: Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield Hills Introduction The case of Brae Burn, Inc., v. City of Bloomfield Hills. Robinson (350 Mich. 425), adjudicated by the Supreme...

        Establishing Liability for Mental Suffering in Breach of Medical Contract: Stewart v. Rudner

Establishing Liability for Mental Suffering in Breach of Medical Contract: Stewart v. Rudner

Date: Sep 5, 1957
Establishing Liability for Mental Suffering in Breach of Medical Contract: Stewart v. Rudner Introduction Stewart v. Rudner is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG: Defining Public Nuisance Standards in Zoning Ordinances

TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG: Defining Public Nuisance Standards in Zoning Ordinances

Date: May 18, 1957
TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG: Defining Public Nuisance Standards in Zoning Ordinances Introduction In the landmark case of TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD v. YOUNG, decided on May 17, 1957, by the Supreme...
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Conjectural Cause: An Analysis of Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company

Res Ipsa Loquitur and Conjectural Cause: An Analysis of Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company

Date: Dec 29, 1956
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Conjectural Cause: An Analysis of Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company Introduction KAMINSKI v. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, 347 Mich. 417 (1956), is a...
Hart v. Ludwig: Reinforcing the Distinction Between Tort and Contractual Nonfeasance

Hart v. Ludwig: Reinforcing the Distinction Between Tort and Contractual Nonfeasance

Date: Dec 29, 1956
Hart v. Ludwig: Reinforcing the Distinction Between Tort and Contractual Nonfeasance Introduction Hart v. Ludwig, decided on December 28, 1956, by the Supreme Court of Michigan, addresses a pivotal...
Statutory Interpretation of 'Benefit Rights' and Exhaustion Under the Michigan Employment Security Act: Melia v. Employment Security Commission

Statutory Interpretation of 'Benefit Rights' and Exhaustion Under the Michigan Employment Security Act: Melia v. Employment Security Commission

Date: Sep 5, 1956
Statutory Interpretation of 'Benefit Rights' and Exhaustion Under the Michigan Employment Security Act: Melia v. Employment Security Commission Introduction Melia v. Employment Security Commission is...
Admissibility of Prior Acts as Evidence of Intent in Second-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. DAVIS (1955)

Admissibility of Prior Acts as Evidence of Intent in Second-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. DAVIS (1955)

Date: Oct 4, 1955
Admissibility of Prior Acts as Evidence of Intent in Second-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. DAVIS (1955) Introduction PEOPLE v. DAVIS, 343 Mich. 348 (1955), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Implied Statutory Repeal and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission

Implied Statutory Repeal and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission

Date: Jan 8, 1946
Implied Statutory Repeal and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission Introduction Jackson v. Michigan Corrections Commission is a pivotal case decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert