Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Limitation on Double Recovery of Attorney Fees: McAULEY v. General Motors Corporation

Limitation on Double Recovery of Attorney Fees: McAULEY v. General Motors Corporation

Date: Jun 3, 1998
Limitation on Double Recovery of Attorney Fees: McAULEY v. General Motors Corporation Court: Supreme Court of Michigan Date: June 2, 1998 Case Number: 457 Mich. 513 Introduction McAULEY v. General...
Admissibility of Prior Wrongdoings in Sexual Conduct Cases: Insights from PEOPLE v. STARR

Admissibility of Prior Wrongdoings in Sexual Conduct Cases: Insights from PEOPLE v. STARR

Date: Jun 3, 1998
Admissibility of Prior Wrongdoings in Sexual Conduct Cases: Insights from PEOPLE v. STARR Introduction PEOPLE v. STARR, 457 Mich. 490 (1998) is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Wilson v. Taylor: Establishing Limits on Writ of Restitution in Land Contract Forfeitures

Wilson v. Taylor: Establishing Limits on Writ of Restitution in Land Contract Forfeitures

Date: May 7, 1998
Wilson v. Taylor: Establishing Limits on Writ of Restitution in Land Contract Forfeitures Introduction Wilson v. Taylor (457 Mich. 232), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on May 6, 1998, is a...
Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Felony-Firearm Cases: PEOPLE v. MITCHELL

Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Felony-Firearm Cases: PEOPLE v. MITCHELL

Date: Apr 2, 1998
Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Felony-Firearm Cases: PEOPLE v. MITCHELL Introduction PEOPLE v. MITCHELL (456 Mich. 693) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, decided on April 1,...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Net-Worth Exclusion for Insured and Public Entities under MPCGA Act

Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Net-Worth Exclusion for Insured and Public Entities under MPCGA Act

Date: Mar 25, 1998
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Net-Worth Exclusion for Insured and Public Entities under MPCGA Act Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court delivered a pivotal decision on March 24, 1998, in the case...
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Judicial Limits on Granting New Trials in People v. Lemmon

Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Judicial Limits on Granting New Trials in People v. Lemmon

Date: Mar 25, 1998
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Judicial Limits on Granting New Trials in People v. Lemmon Introduction The case of People v. Lemmon (456 Mich. 625), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Reaffirming Statute of Repose in Manufacturer Liability: Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Co. v. Marlette Homes, Inc.

Reaffirming Statute of Repose in Manufacturer Liability: Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Co. v. Marlette Homes, Inc.

Date: Feb 25, 1998
Reaffirming Statute of Repose in Manufacturer Liability: Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Co. v. Marlette Homes, Inc. Introduction Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Marlette Homes, Inc. is a...
Reaffirming Probable Cause Standards in Malicious Prosecution: Matthews v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan

Reaffirming Probable Cause Standards in Malicious Prosecution: Matthews v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan

Date: Jan 22, 1998
Reaffirming Probable Cause Standards in Malicious Prosecution: Matthews v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan Introduction Mathews v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan is a landmark case...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Damnum Absque Injuria in Interstate Freeway Nuisances

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Damnum Absque Injuria in Interstate Freeway Nuisances

Date: Jan 22, 1998
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Damnum Absque Injuria in Interstate Freeway Nuisances Introduction In the landmark case of Spiek v. Department of Transportation, the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Establishing Sufficient Evidence in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Insights from TOWN v. Michigan Bell and McConnell v. Rollins Burdick Hunter

Establishing Sufficient Evidence in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Insights from TOWN v. Michigan Bell and McConnell v. Rollins Burdick Hunter

Date: Aug 1, 1997
Establishing Sufficient Evidence in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Insights from TOWN v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company and McConnell v. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Michigan, Inc. Introduction The...
Clarifying 'About to Report' Protections under Michigan's Whistleblowers' Protection Act

Clarifying 'About to Report' Protections under Michigan's Whistleblowers' Protection Act

Date: Jul 31, 1997
Clarifying 'About to Report' Protections under Michigan's Whistleblowers' Protection Act Introduction The case of Shallal v. Catholic Social Services of Wayne County, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Limitations on Michigan's Personal Jurisdiction and Dramshop 'Name-and-Retain' Compliance: GREEN v WILSON

Limitations on Michigan's Personal Jurisdiction and Dramshop 'Name-and-Retain' Compliance: GREEN v WILSON

Date: Jul 23, 1997
Limitations on Michigan's Personal Jurisdiction and Dramshop 'Name-and-Retain' Compliance: GREEN v WILSON Introduction GREEN v WILSON, 455 Mich. 342 (1997), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Implicit Consideration of Restitution Factors in Plea Agreements: Insights from People v Grant

Implicit Consideration of Restitution Factors in Plea Agreements: Insights from People v Grant

Date: Jul 16, 1997
Implicit Consideration of Restitution Factors in Plea Agreements: Insights from People v Grant Introduction People v Grant, 455 Mich. 221 (1997), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Limits on the Lost Opportunity Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: WEYMERS v. KHERA

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Limits on the Lost Opportunity Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: WEYMERS v. KHERA

Date: Jun 18, 1997
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Limits on the Lost Opportunity Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: WEYMERS v. KHERA Introduction The case of WEYMERS v. KHERA, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Reaffirming the Need for Proof of Malice in Felony-Murder Cases: People v. Dumas

Reaffirming the Need for Proof of Malice in Felony-Murder Cases: People v. Dumas

Date: May 21, 1997
Reaffirming the Need for Proof of Malice in Felony-Murder Cases: People v. Dumas Introduction People v. Dumas (454 Mich. 390) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that addresses...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Lex Fori in Choice of Law: Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Lex Fori in Choice of Law: Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service

Date: May 14, 1997
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Lex Fori in Choice of Law: Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service Introduction In Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service, Ltd. (454 Mich. 274), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Executive Immunity in American Transmissions, Inc. v. Attorney General

Affirmation of Executive Immunity in American Transmissions, Inc. v. Attorney General

Date: Mar 26, 1997
Affirmation of Executive Immunity in American Transmissions, Inc. v. Attorney General Introduction American Transmissions, Inc. v. Attorney General is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Strickland Standard in Evaluating Counsel Effectiveness: Insights from People v. Mitchell

Affirmation of Strickland Standard in Evaluating Counsel Effectiveness: Insights from People v. Mitchell

Date: Mar 26, 1997
Affirmation of Strickland Standard in Evaluating Counsel Effectiveness: Insights from People v. Mitchell Introduction People v. Mitchell, 454 Mich. 145 (1997), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Primary Jurisdiction of MPSC Over Utility Contractual Claims: Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell

Primary Jurisdiction of MPSC Over Utility Contractual Claims: Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell

Date: Mar 5, 1997
Primary Jurisdiction of MPSC Over Utility Contractual Claims: Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company Introduction Rinaldo's Construction Corporation v. Michigan Bell...
Redefining Duty of Care in Utility Negligence: Insights from Groncki v. Detroit Edison Company

Redefining Duty of Care in Utility Negligence: Insights from Groncki v. Detroit Edison Company

Date: Dec 31, 1996
Redefining Duty of Care in Utility Negligence: Insights from Groncki v. Detroit Edison Company Introduction The consolidation of Groncki v. Detroit Edison Company, Bohnert v. Detroit Edison Company,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert