Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Damnum Absque Injuria in Interstate Freeway Nuisances Introduction In the landmark case of Spiek v. Department of Transportation, the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Establishing Sufficient Evidence in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Insights from TOWN v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company and McConnell v. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Michigan, Inc. Introduction The...
Clarifying 'About to Report' Protections under Michigan's Whistleblowers' Protection Act Introduction The case of Shallal v. Catholic Social Services of Wayne County, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Limitations on Michigan's Personal Jurisdiction and Dramshop 'Name-and-Retain' Compliance: GREEN v WILSON Introduction GREEN v WILSON, 455 Mich. 342 (1997), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Implicit Consideration of Restitution Factors in Plea Agreements: Insights from People v Grant Introduction People v Grant, 455 Mich. 221 (1997), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Limits on the Lost Opportunity Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: WEYMERS v. KHERA Introduction The case of WEYMERS v. KHERA, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Reaffirming the Need for Proof of Malice in Felony-Murder Cases: People v. Dumas Introduction People v. Dumas (454 Mich. 390) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that addresses...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Lex Fori in Choice of Law: Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service Introduction In Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service, Ltd. (454 Mich. 274), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Executive Immunity in American Transmissions, Inc. v. Attorney General Introduction American Transmissions, Inc. v. Attorney General is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Strickland Standard in Evaluating Counsel Effectiveness: Insights from People v. Mitchell Introduction People v. Mitchell, 454 Mich. 145 (1997), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Primary Jurisdiction of MPSC Over Utility Contractual Claims: Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company Introduction Rinaldo's Construction Corporation v. Michigan Bell...
Redefining Duty of Care in Utility Negligence: Insights from Groncki v. Detroit Edison Company Introduction The consolidation of Groncki v. Detroit Edison Company, Bohnert v. Detroit Edison Company,...
Clear Contract Language Supersedes Past Practices in Collective Bargaining Agreements Introduction Port Huron Education Association v Port Huron Area School District (452 Mich. 309, 1996) is a...
Expanding Duty to Defend in Environmental CERCLA Claims: Insights from AMERICAN BUMPER v. HARTFORD FIRE Insurance Introduction The case of American Bumper and Manufacturing Company v. Hartford Fire...
Establishing the 'Plain Feel' Exception: An Analysis of People v Champion (452 Mich. 92) Introduction People v Champion is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, adjudicated on July 2,...
People v Bailey: Clarifying Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Second-Degree Murder Cases 1. Introduction People v Bailey (451 Mich. 657, 1996) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Cain v. Department of Corrections: Supreme Court of Michigan Clarifies Standards for Judicial Disqualification Introduction Cain v. Department of Corrections (451 Mich. 470, 1996) represents a...
Rebuttal Evidence Admission and Harmless Error: People v. Figgures Introduction People v. Figgures (451 Mich. 390), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on May 21, 1996, addresses critical...
Affirmation of Summary Disposition for Hostile Work Environment Claims in Quinto v. Cross and Peters Company Introduction Quinto v. Cross and Peters Company is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Governmental Immunity and the Hospital Exception: Insights from Tryc v Michigan Veterans' Facility Introduction Tryc v Michigan Veterans' Facility (451 Mich. 129) is a landmark decision by the...