Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Extension of Plain Error Rule to Unpreserved Constitutional Claims in Michigan: People v. Carines

Extension of Plain Error Rule to Unpreserved Constitutional Claims in Michigan: People v. Carines

Date: Jul 28, 1999
Extension of Plain Error Rule to Unpreserved Constitutional Claims in Michigan: People v. Carines Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Mario Estuardo Carines, 460 Mich. 750 (1999), the...
Clarity and Enforceability of Non-Owned Automobile Clauses in Insurance Policies

Clarity and Enforceability of Non-Owned Automobile Clauses in Insurance Policies

Date: Jul 21, 1999
Clarity and Enforceability of Non-Owned Automobile Clauses in Insurance Policies Introduction The case of Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan v. Steven Jacob Nikkel et al., decided by...
Recognition of Foreign Divorce Judgments under Comity and Res Judicata: A Comprehensive Analysis of DART v. DART

Recognition of Foreign Divorce Judgments under Comity and Res Judicata: A Comprehensive Analysis of DART v. DART

Date: Jul 21, 1999
Recognition of Foreign Divorce Judgments under Comity and Res Judicata: A Comprehensive Analysis of DART v. DART Introduction Katina Estelle Dart v. Robert Charles Dart is a seminal case adjudicated...
Establishing 'More Probable Than Not' Standard for Harmless Error in Michigan Criminal Cases: People v. Lukity

Establishing 'More Probable Than Not' Standard for Harmless Error in Michigan Criminal Cases: People v. Lukity

Date: Jul 14, 1999
Establishing 'More Probable Than Not' Standard for Harmless Error in Michigan Criminal Cases: People v. Lukity Introduction People v. Lukity, 460 Mich. 484 (1999), is a landmark decision by the...
Globe Life Insurance Co. v. Debra L. Smith: Michigan Supreme Court Sets New Precedents on Insurance Misrepresentation and Consumer Protection

Globe Life Insurance Co. v. Debra L. Smith: Michigan Supreme Court Sets New Precedents on Insurance Misrepresentation and Consumer Protection

Date: Jul 14, 1999
Globe Life Insurance Co. v. Debra L. Smith: Michigan Supreme Court Sets New Precedents on Insurance Misrepresentation and Consumer Protection Introduction In Debra L. SMITH v. GLOBE LIFE INSurance...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Statutory Right to Detailed Parole Denial Explanations for Parolable Life Inmates

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Statutory Right to Detailed Parole Denial Explanations for Parolable Life Inmates

Date: Jul 14, 1999
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Statutory Right to Detailed Parole Denial Explanations for Parolable Life Inmates Introduction In the landmark case of Mary Glover v. Michigan Parole Board, decided...
Ameritech Michigan v. Michigan PSC: Establishing the Requirement for IntraLATA Toll Dialing Parity upon InterLATA Market Entry

Ameritech Michigan v. Michigan PSC: Establishing the Requirement for IntraLATA Toll Dialing Parity upon InterLATA Market Entry

Date: Jul 9, 1999
Ameritech Michigan v. Michigan Public Service Commission: Establishing the Requirement for IntraLATA Toll Dialing Parity upon InterLATA Market Entry Introduction In the landmark case of Ameritech...
Clarifying "In the Care Of" Clause in Homeowner's Insurance: HENDERSON v. STATE FARM

Clarifying "In the Care Of" Clause in Homeowner's Insurance: HENDERSON v. STATE FARM

Date: Jul 9, 1999
Clarifying "In the Care Of" Clause in Homeowner's Insurance: HENDERSON v. STATE FARM Introduction HENDERSON v. STATE FARM Fire and Casualty Company is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Unenforceability of Contractual Venue Provisions for Future Causes of Action: OMNE Financial Inc. v. Shacks Inc.

Unenforceability of Contractual Venue Provisions for Future Causes of Action: OMNE Financial Inc. v. Shacks Inc.

Date: Jul 8, 1999
Unenforceability of Contractual Venue Provisions for Future Causes of Action: OMNE Financial Inc. v. Shacks Inc. Introduction The case of OMNE Financial, Inc. v. Shacks, Inc. adjudicated by the...
Arrest Requirement for Implied Consent in Chemical Testing: PEOPLE v. BORCHARD-RUHLAND

Arrest Requirement for Implied Consent in Chemical Testing: PEOPLE v. BORCHARD-RUHLAND

Date: Jul 2, 1999
Arrest Requirement for Implied Consent in Chemical Testing: PEOPLE v. BORCHARD-RUHLAND Introduction In the landmark case People of the State of Michigan v. Ann Charlotte Borchard-Ruhland (460 Mich....
Reasonable Timeframe for Filing Appeal Bonds under MCL 600.5744(5)

Reasonable Timeframe for Filing Appeal Bonds under MCL 600.5744(5)

Date: Jun 30, 1999
Reasonable Timeframe for Filing Appeal Bonds under MCL 600.5744(5) Introduction Sun Valley Foods Company v. George E. Ward (460 Mich. 230) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Intentional Acts Do Not Constitute 'Accidents': Supreme Court of Michigan Sets Precedent on Insurance Coverage

Intentional Acts Do Not Constitute 'Accidents': Supreme Court of Michigan Sets Precedent on Insurance Coverage

Date: Jun 16, 1999
Intentional Acts Do Not Constitute 'Accidents': Supreme Court of Michigan Sets Precedent on Insurance Coverage Introduction The case of Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Masters presented a...
Expansion of Physician-Patient Privilege: Protecting Identities of Non-Involved Patients and Securing Hospital Peer Review Confidentiality

Expansion of Physician-Patient Privilege: Protecting Identities of Non-Involved Patients and Securing Hospital Peer Review Confidentiality

Date: Jun 10, 1999
Expansion of Physician-Patient Privilege: Protecting Identities of Non-Involved Patients and Securing Hospital Peer Review Confidentiality Introduction The case of Deborah Dorris and Raymond DORRIS...
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Analysis of People v. Hoag

Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Analysis of People v. Hoag

Date: Jun 10, 1999
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Analysis of People v. Hoag Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Mark Zachary Hoag, Supreme Court of...
Enhancing Witness Credibility Challenges: Insights from People v. Glen Dale Brownridge

Enhancing Witness Credibility Challenges: Insights from People v. Glen Dale Brownridge

Date: Apr 21, 1999
Enhancing Witness Credibility Challenges: Insights from People v. Glen Dale Brownridge Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Glen Dale Brownridge (459 Mich. 456, 1999) is a pivotal case...
Overruling Vail: Re-defining Harmless Error Standards in Michigan Jurisprudence

Overruling Vail: Re-defining Harmless Error Standards in Michigan Jurisprudence

Date: Jul 31, 1998
Overruling Vail: Re-defining Harmless Error Standards in Michigan Jurisprudence Introduction PEOPLE v. GRAVES (458 Mich. 476) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, decided on July...
Michigan Supreme Court Tightens Standards for Admissibility of Prior Convictions under MRE 404(b) in PEOPLE v CRAWFORD

Michigan Supreme Court Tightens Standards for Admissibility of Prior Convictions under MRE 404(b) in PEOPLE v CRAWFORD

Date: Jul 29, 1998
Michigan Supreme Court Tightens Standards for Admissibility of Prior Convictions under MRE 404(b) in PEOPLE v CRAWFORD Introduction In People v. Crawford, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Express Easement Requirements Under Michigan Statute of Frauds: FORGE v SMITH Analysis

Express Easement Requirements Under Michigan Statute of Frauds: FORGE v SMITH Analysis

Date: Jul 15, 1998
Express Easement Requirements Under Michigan Statute of Frauds: FORGE v SMITH Analysis Introduction FORGE v SMITH, 458 Mich. 198, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on July 14, 1998, addresses...
Legitimate Expectation and Discrimination Protections under Michigan Law: Insights from LYTLE v. MALADY (1998)

Legitimate Expectation and Discrimination Protections under Michigan Law: Insights from LYTLE v. MALADY (1998)

Date: Jul 2, 1998
Legitimate Expectation and Discrimination Protections under Michigan Law: Insights from LYTLE v. MALADY (1998) Introduction LYTLE v. MALADY is a landmark 1998 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Prosecution's Authority to Amend Charges in Second-Degree Murder Cases

Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Prosecution's Authority to Amend Charges in Second-Degree Murder Cases

Date: Jun 3, 1998
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Prosecution's Authority to Amend Charges in Second-Degree Murder Cases Introduction In PEOPLE v. GOECKE (457 Mich. 442), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert