Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Establishing Causation in Pregnancy Discrimination Claims: Insights from Sniecinski v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Establishing Causation in Pregnancy Discrimination Claims: Insights from Sniecinski v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Date: Jul 23, 2003
Establishing Causation in Pregnancy Discrimination Claims: Insights from Sniecinski v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Introduction The case of Sniecinski v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan...
Allocution and Three-Part Inquiry Mandated in Juvenile Sentencing as Adults under MCL 712A.18(1)(n)

Allocution and Three-Part Inquiry Mandated in Juvenile Sentencing as Adults under MCL 712A.18(1)(n)

Date: Jul 18, 2003
Allocution and Three-Part Inquiry Mandated in Juvenile Sentencing as Adults under MCL 712A.18(1)(n) Introduction People v. Petty, 665 N.W.2d 443 (Supreme Court of Michigan, 2003), is a landmark case...
Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms Traditional Contract Interpretation over Rule of Reasonable Expectations in Wilkie v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms Traditional Contract Interpretation over Rule of Reasonable Expectations in Wilkie v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Date: Jul 17, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms Traditional Contract Interpretation over Rule of Reasonable Expectations in Wilkie v. Auto-Owners Insurance Introduction The case of Wilkie v. Auto-Owners Insurance...
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Assessing Third-Party Confessions: Analysis of PEOPLE v. CRESS

Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Assessing Third-Party Confessions: Analysis of PEOPLE v. CRESS

Date: Jul 10, 2003
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Assessing Third-Party Confessions: Analysis of PEOPLE v. CRESS Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Thomas David Cress, 468 Mich. 678 (2003), presents a...
Establishing Manslaughter as an Inferior Offense of Murder in Michigan: Analysis of People v. Mendoza

Establishing Manslaughter as an Inferior Offense of Murder in Michigan: Analysis of People v. Mendoza

Date: Jun 21, 2003
Establishing Manslaughter as an Inferior Offense of Murder in Michigan: Analysis of People v. Mendoza Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Richard J. Mendoza, 468 Mich. 527 (2003), the...
Ambiguous Commission Vesting Schedules: Extrinsic Evidence and Contra Proferentem in Agent Contracts

Ambiguous Commission Vesting Schedules: Extrinsic Evidence and Contra Proferentem in Agent Contracts

Date: Jun 19, 2003
Ambiguous Commission Vesting Schedules: Extrinsic Evidence and Contra Proferentem in Agent Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of Craig A. Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, Inc.,...
Affirming the Bright-Line Exclusion of Polygraph Evidence: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Jonathan Joe Jones (468 Mich. 345)

Affirming the Bright-Line Exclusion of Polygraph Evidence: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Jonathan Joe Jones (468 Mich. 345)

Date: Jun 12, 2003
Affirming the Bright-Line Exclusion of Polygraph Evidence: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Jonathan Joe Jones (468 Mich. 345) Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Jonathan Joe Jones is...
Premature Adoption Prevented During Pending Appeal: In re JK, Minor

Premature Adoption Prevented During Pending Appeal: In re JK, Minor

Date: May 21, 2003
Premature Adoption Prevented During Pending Appeal: In re JK, Minor Introduction The case of In re JK, Minor. involves the termination of parental rights of Melissa Kucharaski, the mother of a...
Limitations on Shareholder Standing and Governmental Immunity in Lease Disputes: Insights from Belle Isle Grill v. City of Detroit

Limitations on Shareholder Standing and Governmental Immunity in Lease Disputes: Insights from Belle Isle Grill v. City of Detroit

Date: May 7, 2003
Limitations on Shareholder Standing and Governmental Immunity in Lease Disputes: Insights from Belle Isle Grill Corp. v. City of Detroit Introduction The case of Belle Isle Grill Corporation and...
Establishing Standards for Magistrate Discretion in Preliminary Examinations: People v. Yost

Establishing Standards for Magistrate Discretion in Preliminary Examinations: People v. Yost

Date: Apr 24, 2003
Establishing Standards for Magistrate Discretion in Preliminary Examinations: People v. Yost Introduction People v. Yost (468 Mich. 122, 2003) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming Felony Murder Liability: PEOPLE v. RILEY (2003)

Reaffirming Felony Murder Liability: PEOPLE v. RILEY (2003)

Date: Apr 24, 2003
Reaffirming Felony Murder Liability: PEOPLE v. RILEY (2003) Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Robert Riley, 468 Mich. 135 (2003), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
City of Zeeland Not Liable as an Intended Third-Party Beneficiary: Comprehensive Review of Brunsell v. City of Zeeland

City of Zeeland Not Liable as an Intended Third-Party Beneficiary: Comprehensive Review of Brunsell v. City of Zeeland

Date: Sep 25, 2002
City of Zeeland Not Liable as an Intended Third-Party Beneficiary: Comprehensive Review of Brunsell v. City of Zeeland Introduction The case of Eleanor Brunsell v. City of Zeeland, adjudicated by the...
Linda MACK v. CITY OF DETROIT: Reaffirming Governmental Immunity and Its Implications

Linda MACK v. CITY OF DETROIT: Reaffirming Governmental Immunity and Its Implications

Date: Aug 1, 2002
Linda MACK v. CITY OF DETROIT: Reaffirming Governmental Immunity and Its Implications Introduction Linda MACK v. CITY OF DETROIT, 467 Mich. 186 (2002), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Clarification of 'Duty to Retreat' and the 'Castle Doctrine' in Michigan Self-Defense Law

Clarification of 'Duty to Retreat' and the 'Castle Doctrine' in Michigan Self-Defense Law

Date: Aug 1, 2002
Clarification of 'Duty to Retreat' and the 'Castle Doctrine' in Michigan Self-Defense Law Introduction The case of People of the State of Michigan v. Marcel R. Riddle (467 Mich. 116) serves as a...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants Prohibiting Commercial Uses in Residential Subdivisions

Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants Prohibiting Commercial Uses in Residential Subdivisions

Date: Jul 26, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants Prohibiting Commercial Uses in Residential Subdivisions Introduction The case of Janice Terrien, Thomas Hagen, and Janet Thomas...
Allocution Opportunity Satisfied Through General Inquiry: Michigan Supreme Court Overrules Specific Inquiry Requirement

Allocution Opportunity Satisfied Through General Inquiry: Michigan Supreme Court Overrules Specific Inquiry Requirement

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Allocution Opportunity Satisfied Through General Inquiry: Michigan Supreme Court Overrules Specific Inquiry Requirement Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Linda Petit, 466 Mich. 624...
Examination Under Oath Provisions in No-Fault Auto Insurance: Harmonizing Contract Terms with Statutory Mandates

Examination Under Oath Provisions in No-Fault Auto Insurance: Harmonizing Contract Terms with Statutory Mandates

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Examination Under Oath Provisions in No-Fault Auto Insurance: Harmonizing Contract Terms with Statutory Mandates Introduction The case of Peter Cruz, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance...
Silver v. People: Establishing the Necessity of Lesser Included Offense Instructions

Silver v. People: Establishing the Necessity of Lesser Included Offense Instructions

Date: Jun 26, 2002
Silver v. People: Establishing the Necessity of Lesser Included Offense Instructions 1. Introduction Silver v. People is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on June 25, 2002. The...
Overruling the 'No Inference on an Inference' Doctrine: Implications of People v. Hardiman

Overruling the 'No Inference on an Inference' Doctrine: Implications of People v. Hardiman

Date: Jun 26, 2002
Overruling the 'No Inference on an Inference' Doctrine: Implications of People v. Hardiman Introduction In the landmark case People v. Hardiman, the Supreme Court of Michigan confronted pivotal...
Clarifying Lesser Included Offense Instructions: Michigan Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in People v. Cornell

Clarifying Lesser Included Offense Instructions: Michigan Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in People v. Cornell

Date: Jun 19, 2002
Clarifying Lesser Included Offense Instructions: Michigan Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in People v. Cornell Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. Adam Keith...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert