Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Coordination of Unemployment Benefits with Pension Funds: A Comprehensive Analysis of Koonz v. Ameritech Services, Inc.

Coordination of Unemployment Benefits with Pension Funds: A Comprehensive Analysis of Koonz v. Ameritech Services, Inc.

Date: Jun 13, 2002
Coordination of Unemployment Benefits with Pension Funds: A Comprehensive Analysis of Koonz v. Ameritech Services, Inc. Introduction Nancy Koontz, the plaintiff-appellee, initiated legal proceedings...
Strict Adherence to Notice Requirements Under MCL 600.2912b for Tolling Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Claims

Strict Adherence to Notice Requirements Under MCL 600.2912b for Tolling Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Claims

Date: Apr 25, 2002
Strict Adherence to Notice Requirements Under MCL 600.2912b for Tolling Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Claims Introduction The case of Lisa ROBERTS v. MECOSTA COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL...
Michigan Supreme Court Restricts Governmental Immunity: Overruling the Trespass-Nuisance Exception

Michigan Supreme Court Restricts Governmental Immunity: Overruling the Trespass-Nuisance Exception

Date: Apr 3, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court Restricts Governmental Immunity: Overruling the Trespass-Nuisance Exception Introduction In the landmark case Pohutski et al. v. City of Allen Park, the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in People v. LeBlanc

Reaffirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in People v. LeBlanc

Date: Mar 13, 2002
Reaffirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in People v. LeBlanc Introduction People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. William Emery LeBlanc,...
Michigan Supreme Court Limits Public Duty Doctrine to Police Protection

Michigan Supreme Court Limits Public Duty Doctrine to Police Protection

Date: Jul 28, 2001
Michigan Supreme Court Limits Public Duty Doctrine to Police Protection Introduction In NICOLE M. BEAUDRIE v. PAULINE HENDERSON (465 Mich. 124), the Michigan Supreme Court addressed the scope of the...
Knowledge of Quantity as an Element in Conspiracy to Deliver Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. MASS

Knowledge of Quantity as an Element in Conspiracy to Deliver Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. MASS

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Knowledge of Quantity as an Element in Conspiracy to Deliver Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. MASS Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. Jimmy Mass (464 Mich. 615),...
Blossom J. Hazle v. Ford Motor Company: Application of McDonnell Douglas Burden-Shifting in Race Discrimination Claims under MCRA

Blossom J. Hazle v. Ford Motor Company: Application of McDonnell Douglas Burden-Shifting in Race Discrimination Claims under MCRA

Date: Jul 4, 2001
Blossom J. Hazle v. Ford Motor Company: Application of McDonnell Douglas Burden-Shifting in Race Discrimination Claims under MCRA Introduction Blossom J. Hazle v. Ford Motor Company and Ford-UAW...
Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms 'Open and Obvious Danger' Doctrine in Odis Lugo v. Ameritech Corporation, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms 'Open and Obvious Danger' Doctrine in Odis Lugo v. Ameritech Corporation, Inc.

Date: Jul 4, 2001
Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms 'Open and Obvious Danger' Doctrine in Odis Lugo v. Ameritech Corporation, Inc. Introduction The case of Odis Lugo v. Ameritech Corporation, Inc. brought before the...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Diminished Capacity Defense in Carpenter Case

Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Diminished Capacity Defense in Carpenter Case

Date: Jun 13, 2001
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Diminished Capacity Defense in Carpenter Case Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. James A. Carpenter, the Supreme Court...
Reckless Drag Racing and Legal 'Involvement' in Fatal Accidents: A Commentary on PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN v. ALDRICH

Reckless Drag Racing and Legal 'Involvement' in Fatal Accidents: A Commentary on PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN v. ALDRICH

Date: May 19, 2001
Reckless Drag Racing and Legal 'Involvement' in Fatal Accidents: A Commentary on PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN v. ALDRICH Introduction In the pivotal case of People of the State of Michigan v. Kris...
Affirming the Strickland Standard Application in Alibi Defense: Carbin v. People

Affirming the Strickland Standard Application in Alibi Defense: Carbin v. People

Date: Apr 4, 2001
Affirming the Strickland Standard Application in Alibi Defense: Carbin v. People Introduction In the case of People of the State of Michigan v. Steve Carbin (463 Mich. 590), the Supreme Court of...
Limits on Res Judicata in Summary Possession: Michigan Supreme Court in Sewell v. Clean Cut Management

Limits on Res Judicata in Summary Possession: Michigan Supreme Court in Sewell v. Clean Cut Management

Date: Jan 31, 2001
Limits on Res Judicata in Summary Possession: Michigan Supreme Court in Sewell v. Clean Cut Management Introduction In Sewell v. Clean Cut Management, Inc., the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed...
DeBrow v. Century 21 Great Lakes Inc.: Direct Evidence of Age Discrimination Recognized

DeBrow v. Century 21 Great Lakes Inc.: Direct Evidence of Age Discrimination Recognized

Date: Jan 18, 2001
DeBrow v. Century 21 Great Lakes Inc.: Direct Evidence of Age Discrimination Recognized Introduction In the landmark case of Paul DeBrow v. Century 21 Great Lakes Inc., decided on January 17, 2001,...
Reversing Fraud Claims in Employment Contracts: HORD v. ERIM Establishes Stringent Standards

Reversing Fraud Claims in Employment Contracts: HORD v. ERIM Establishes Stringent Standards

Date: Oct 11, 2000
Reversing Fraud Claims in Employment Contracts: HORD v. ERIM Establishes Stringent Standards Introduction The case of R. Michael Hord v. Environmental Research Institute of Michigan (ERIM) reached...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Distinct Framework for Employer Vicarious Liability in Sexual Harassment Cases under MCRA

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Distinct Framework for Employer Vicarious Liability in Sexual Harassment Cases under MCRA

Date: Aug 1, 2000
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Distinct Framework for Employer Vicarious Liability in Sexual Harassment Cases under MCRA Introduction In the landmark case of Robyn CHAMBERS v. TRETTCO, INC. (463...
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Highway Exception: Pedestrians Protected, Traffic Sign Duties Excluded

Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Highway Exception: Pedestrians Protected, Traffic Sign Duties Excluded

Date: Jul 29, 2000
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Highway Exception: Pedestrians Protected, Traffic Sign Duties Excluded Introduction In the landmark decision of Nawrocki v Macomb County Road Commission and Evens v...
Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from People of the State of Michigan v. James A. Sabin

Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from People of the State of Michigan v. James A. Sabin

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from People of the State of Michigan v. James A. Sabin Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan's decision in People of the...
Establishing 'Reasonable Care' Standard in Stray Voltage Cases: Kenneth & Diana Case v. Consumers Power Company

Establishing 'Reasonable Care' Standard in Stray Voltage Cases: Kenneth & Diana Case v. Consumers Power Company

Date: Jul 27, 2000
Establishing 'Reasonable Care' Standard in Stray Voltage Cases: Kenneth & Diana Case v. Consumers Power Company Introduction In the landmark case of Kenneth Case and Diana Case v. Consumers Power...
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Discovery Obligations and Continuance Duties in Criminal Trials

Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Discovery Obligations and Continuance Duties in Criminal Trials

Date: Jul 26, 2000
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Discovery Obligations and Continuance Duties in Criminal Trials Introduction The case of People of the State of Michigan v. Chad Lewis Elston (462 Mich. 751)...
Noncommercial Visitors to Religious Institutions Classified as Licensees: Moeller v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship

Noncommercial Visitors to Religious Institutions Classified as Licensees: Moeller v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship

Date: Jul 19, 2000
Noncommercial Visitors to Religious Institutions Classified as Licensees: Moeller v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship Introduction Moeller v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship is a seminal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert