Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Expanding the Scope of Traffic Stop Investigations: People v. Williams

Expanding the Scope of Traffic Stop Investigations: People v. Williams

Date: May 12, 2005
Expanding the Scope of Traffic Stop Investigations: People v. Williams Introduction People v. Williams, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on May 11, 2005, addresses the intricate boundaries of...
Overruling the 'Continuing Violations' Doctrine: Implications of Garg v. Macomb County Community Mental Health Services

Overruling the 'Continuing Violations' Doctrine: Implications of Garg v. Macomb County Community Mental Health Services

Date: May 12, 2005
Overruling the 'Continuing Violations' Doctrine: Implications of Garg v. Macomb County Community Mental Health Services Introduction Garg v. Macomb County Community Mental Health Services, 472 Mich....
Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corporation: Clarifying Adverse Inference Instructions under the Federal Safety Appliance Act

Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corporation: Clarifying Adverse Inference Instructions under the Federal Safety Appliance Act

Date: Mar 9, 2005
Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corporation: Clarifying Adverse Inference Instructions under the Federal Safety Appliance Act Introduction Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corporation is a landmark case...
Appellate Attorney Fees Exclusion in Case Evaluation Sanctions: Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights

Appellate Attorney Fees Exclusion in Case Evaluation Sanctions: Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights

Date: Jan 26, 2005
Appellate Attorney Fees Exclusion in Case Evaluation Sanctions: Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights Introduction The case of Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Michigan Court of Appeals Affirms Parental Rights Termination in In re BZ In re KZ

Michigan Court of Appeals Affirms Parental Rights Termination in In re BZ In re KZ

Date: Nov 5, 2004
Michigan Court of Appeals Affirms Parental Rights Termination in In re BZ In re KZ Introduction The case of In re BZ In re KZ (No. 253112) adjudicated by the Michigan Court of Appeals on November 4,...
Distinguishing Medical Malpractice from Ordinary Negligence: Insights from Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, Inc.

Distinguishing Medical Malpractice from Ordinary Negligence: Insights from Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, Inc.

Date: Jul 31, 2004
Distinguishing Medical Malpractice from Ordinary Negligence: Insights from Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, Inc. Introduction Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, Inc., 471 Mich. 411...
CRAIG v. OAKWOOD HOSPITAL: Strengthening Gatekeeping in Expert Testimony and Defining Successor Liability

CRAIG v. OAKWOOD HOSPITAL: Strengthening Gatekeeping in Expert Testimony and Defining Successor Liability

Date: Jul 24, 2004
CRAIG v. OAKWOOD HOSPITAL: Strengthening Gatekeeping in Expert Testimony and Defining Successor Liability Introduction CRAIG v. OAKWOOD HOSPITAL, 471 Mich. 67 (2004), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Excessive Verdicts and Counsel Conduct: Landmark Michigan Decision in Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler

Excessive Verdicts and Counsel Conduct: Landmark Michigan Decision in Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler

Date: Jul 23, 2004
Excessive Verdicts and Counsel Conduct: Landmark Michigan Decision in Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Introduction Case: Linda M. Gilbert, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation,...
Michigan Supreme Court Reinforces Duty of Criminal Defense Attorneys to Conduct Thorough Investigations: PEOPLE v. GRANT

Michigan Supreme Court Reinforces Duty of Criminal Defense Attorneys to Conduct Thorough Investigations: PEOPLE v. GRANT

Date: Jul 16, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court Reinforces Duty of Criminal Defense Attorneys to Conduct Thorough Investigations: PEOPLE v. GRANT Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v....
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Limits on Contractor Liability to Third Parties in Negligence Claims

Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Limits on Contractor Liability to Third Parties in Negligence Claims

Date: Jul 15, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Limits on Contractor Liability to Third Parties in Negligence Claims Introduction In the landmark case Sandra Gail Fultz and Otto Fultz v. Union-Commerce Associates...
Affirming MCL 257.401(3): Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Damages Caps and Clarifies Jury Trial Protections

Affirming MCL 257.401(3): Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Damages Caps and Clarifies Jury Trial Protections

Date: Jul 7, 2004
Affirming MCL 257.401(3): Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Damages Caps and Clarifies Jury Trial Protections Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court rendered a significant decision in Phillips v....
Preservation of Constitutional Challenges Through Testimony: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Boyd

Preservation of Constitutional Challenges Through Testimony: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Boyd

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Preservation of Constitutional Challenges Through Testimony: A Comprehensive Analysis of People of the State of Michigan v. Eric Boyd Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Eric Boyd, 470...
Proper Application of Offense Variables in Michigan Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from People v. Kimble

Proper Application of Offense Variables in Michigan Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from People v. Kimble

Date: Jun 30, 2004
Proper Application of Offense Variables in Michigan Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from People v. Kimble Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. Richard A. Kimble...
Establishing the 'Sexual Nature' Threshold in Sexual Harassment Claims: CORLEY v. DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION

Establishing the 'Sexual Nature' Threshold in Sexual Harassment Claims: CORLEY v. DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION

Date: Jun 18, 2004
Establishing the 'Sexual Nature' Threshold in Sexual Harassment Claims: CORLEY v. DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION Introduction The case of Patricia Myra CORLEY v. DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Joseph Smith,...
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Headlee Amendment Educational Funding Disputes

Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Headlee Amendment Educational Funding Disputes

Date: Jun 10, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Headlee Amendment Educational Funding Disputes Introduction In Daniel ADAIR v. STATE OF MICHIGAN (470 Mich. 105), the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Collateral Estoppel Without Mutuality in Defensive Contexts: Michigan Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Collateral Estoppel Without Mutuality in Defensive Contexts: Michigan Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Date: Apr 23, 2004
Collateral Estoppel Without Mutuality in Defensive Contexts: Michigan Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in the landmark case Monat v. State Farm...
Schmalfeldt v. North Pointe Insurance Company: Limiting Third-Party Beneficiary Rights in Insurance Contracts

Schmalfeldt v. North Pointe Insurance Company: Limiting Third-Party Beneficiary Rights in Insurance Contracts

Date: Nov 5, 2003
Schmalfeldt v. North Pointe Insurance Company: Limiting Third-Party Beneficiary Rights in Insurance Contracts Introduction Schmalfeldt v. North Pointe Insurance Company, 469 Mich. 422 (2003), is a...
Enforcement of Anti-Waiver and Written Modification Clauses Requires Mutual Consent: Insights from Quality Products and Concepts Company v. Nagel Precision, Inc.

Enforcement of Anti-Waiver and Written Modification Clauses Requires Mutual Consent: Insights from Quality Products and Concepts Company v. Nagel Precision, Inc.

Date: Aug 1, 2003
Enforcement of Anti-Waiver and Written Modification Clauses Requires Mutual Consent: Insights from Quality Products and Concepts Company v. Nagel Precision, Inc. Introduction Quality Products and...
Clarifying "Substantial and Compelling Reasons" in Sentencing Departures – People v. Babcock

Clarifying "Substantial and Compelling Reasons" in Sentencing Departures – People v. Babcock

Date: Aug 1, 2003
Clarifying "Substantial and Compelling Reasons" in Sentencing Departures – People v. Babcock Introduction People v. Babcock, a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan in 2003, addresses...
Establishing Causation in Whistleblower Retaliation Claims: Michigan Supreme Court's West v. General Motors Decision

Establishing Causation in Whistleblower Retaliation Claims: Michigan Supreme Court's West v. General Motors Decision

Date: Jul 23, 2003
Establishing Causation in Whistleblower Retaliation Claims: Michigan Supreme Court's West v. General Motors Decision Introduction In the landmark case of West v. General Motors Corporation (469 Mich....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert