Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Insanity Saving Provision of MCL 600.5851(1) Extends to Medical Malpractice Claims: Vega v. Estate of Hurley

Insanity Saving Provision of MCL 600.5851(1) Extends to Medical Malpractice Claims: Vega v. Estate of Hurley

Date: Jul 19, 2007
Insanity Saving Provision of MCL 600.5851(1) Extends to Medical Malpractice Claims: Vega v. Estate of Hurley Introduction The case of Jodie Vega, Conservator of the Estate of Jeffrey Hurley, a Minor...
Blockburger Reinstated: Michigan Supreme Court Eliminates Robideau Test for Double Jeopardy

Blockburger Reinstated: Michigan Supreme Court Eliminates Robideau Test for Double Jeopardy

Date: Jun 21, 2007
Blockburger Reinstated: Michigan Supreme Court Eliminates Robideau Test for Double Jeopardy Introduction In the landmark case People of the State of Michigan v. Bobby Lynell Smith, the Supreme Court...
Exclusionary Rule and Derivative Evidence in Frazier v. People of Michigan

Exclusionary Rule and Derivative Evidence in Frazier v. People of Michigan

Date: Jun 7, 2007
Exclusionary Rule and Derivative Evidence in Frazier v. People of Michigan Introduction Frazier v. People of Michigan is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on June 6, 2007. This...
Michigan Supreme Court Enforces Mandatory 120-Day Notice Requirement for Defective Highway Claims, Overruling Hobbs and Brown

Michigan Supreme Court Enforces Mandatory 120-Day Notice Requirement for Defective Highway Claims, Overruling Hobbs and Brown

Date: May 3, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court Enforces Mandatory 120-Day Notice Requirement for Defective Highway Claims, Overruling Hobbs and Brown Introduction The case of Joanne Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road...
Affidavit of Merit and Defendant's Obligation to Respond: Insights from Saffian v. Simmons

Affidavit of Merit and Defendant's Obligation to Respond: Insights from Saffian v. Simmons

Date: Feb 7, 2007
Affidavit of Merit and Defendant's Obligation to Respond: Insights from Saffian v. Simmons Introduction Saffian v. Simmons, 477 Mich. 8, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan in 2007, addresses...
Exclusion of Sex Offender Profiling Evidence Affirmed: People v. Dobek

Exclusion of Sex Offender Profiling Evidence Affirmed: People v. Dobek

Date: Jan 31, 2007
Exclusion of Sex Offender Profiling Evidence Affirmed: People v. Dobek Introduction In People v. Dobek, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed significant legal issues surrounding prosecutorial...
Affirmation of Trial Courts' Authority to Sanction for Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity in Maldonado v. Ford Motor Company

Affirmation of Trial Courts' Authority to Sanction for Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity in Maldonado v. Ford Motor Company

Date: Aug 1, 2006
Affirmation of Trial Courts' Authority to Sanction for Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity in Maldonado v. Ford Motor Company Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in the case of Justine Maldonado...
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Treatment of Unpreserved Bruton Errors in Joint Trials

Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Treatment of Unpreserved Bruton Errors in Joint Trials

Date: Jun 15, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Treatment of Unpreserved Bruton Errors in Joint Trials Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. Cedric Pipes and Julian Dale Key, the...
Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Adopt Restatement Agency Exception to Respondeat Superior in Zsigo v. Hurley Medical Center

Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Adopt Restatement Agency Exception to Respondeat Superior in Zsigo v. Hurley Medical Center

Date: Jun 15, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Adopt Restatement Agency Exception to Respondeat Superior in Zsigo v. Hurley Medical Center Introduction In Zsigo v. Hurley Medical Center (475 Mich. 215, 2006),...
Supreme Court of Michigan Overrules People v. Smith: Affirming the 180-Day Rule Applicability Irrespective of Mandatory Consecutive Sentencing

Supreme Court of Michigan Overrules People v. Smith: Affirming the 180-Day Rule Applicability Irrespective of Mandatory Consecutive Sentencing

Date: Jun 15, 2006
Supreme Court of Michigan Overrules People v. Smith: Affirming the 180-Day Rule Applicability Irrespective of Mandatory Consecutive Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State...
People v. Drohan: Michigan's Indeterminate Sentencing Scheme and Sixth Amendment Compliance

People v. Drohan: Michigan's Indeterminate Sentencing Scheme and Sixth Amendment Compliance

Date: Jun 14, 2006
People v. Drohan: Michigan's Indeterminate Sentencing Scheme and Sixth Amendment Compliance Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Joseph Eric Drohan (475 Mich. 140, 2006) marks a...
Aiding and Abetting Liability Expanded: Analysis of People v. Robinson

Aiding and Abetting Liability Expanded: Analysis of People v. Robinson

Date: Jun 1, 2006
Aiding and Abetting Liability Expanded: Analysis of People v. Robinson Introduction The case of People of the State of Michigan v. Kevin M. Robinson, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan in...
Defining 'Perpetration' in Felony-Murder: Insights from People v. Gillis

Defining 'Perpetration' in Felony-Murder: Insights from People v. Gillis

Date: Apr 6, 2006
Defining 'Perpetration' in Felony-Murder: Insights from People v. Gillis Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. John Albert Gillis, 474 Mich. 105 (2006), is a landmark decision by the...
Defining Offense Variable 13: Inclusion of Sentencing Offense in Five-Year Period - People v. Francisco

Defining Offense Variable 13: Inclusion of Sentencing Offense in Five-Year Period - People v. Francisco

Date: Mar 24, 2006
Defining Offense Variable 13: Inclusion of Sentencing Offense in Five-Year Period - People v. Francisco Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Charles Wayne Francisco, 474 Mich. 82 (2006),...
Enforcing the One-Year-Back Limitation: Michigan Supreme Court Overrules Judicial Tolling in No-Fault Insurance Claims

Enforcing the One-Year-Back Limitation: Michigan Supreme Court Overrules Judicial Tolling in No-Fault Insurance Claims

Date: Jul 30, 2005
Enforcing the One-Year-Back Limitation: Michigan Supreme Court Overrules Judicial Tolling in No-Fault Insurance Claims Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court, in the landmark case EVA DEVILLERS, as...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Standard Enforcement of Unambiguous Contract Provisions in Insurance Policies

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Standard Enforcement of Unambiguous Contract Provisions in Insurance Policies

Date: Jul 29, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Standard Enforcement of Unambiguous Contract Provisions in Insurance Policies Introduction In the landmark case of Shirley Rory and Ethel Woods v. Continental...
Enforcement of Pollution Exclusion Clauses in Municipal Insurance: Analysis of City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability and Property Pool

Enforcement of Pollution Exclusion Clauses in Municipal Insurance: Analysis of City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability and Property Pool

Date: Jul 20, 2005
Enforcement of Pollution Exclusion Clauses in Municipal Insurance: Analysis of City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability and Property Pool (473 Mich 188) Introduction The case of...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Injury Requirement for Negligence Claims in Toxic Tort Cases

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Injury Requirement for Negligence Claims in Toxic Tort Cases

Date: Jul 14, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Injury Requirement for Negligence Claims in Toxic Tort Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Gary and Kathy Henry, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The Dow...
No-Fault Insurance Excludes Ordinary Food Expenses for At-Home Care under MCL 500.3105 and MCL 500.3107

No-Fault Insurance Excludes Ordinary Food Expenses for At-Home Care under MCL 500.3105 and MCL 500.3107

Date: Jun 15, 2005
No-Fault Insurance Excludes Ordinary Food Expenses for At-Home Care under MCL 500.3105 and MCL 500.3107 Introduction The case of Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (472 Mich....
Individual Liability of Employer’s Agents Under the Michigan Civil Rights Act: Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.

Individual Liability of Employer’s Agents Under the Michigan Civil Rights Act: Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.

Date: Jun 2, 2005
Individual Liability of Employer’s Agents Under the Michigan Civil Rights Act: Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co. Introduction The case of Elezovic v. Ford Motor Company, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert