Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kansas Case Commentaries

Preclusion of Prior Convictions from Criminal History Scoring When Used to Enhance Sentencing: Kansas v. Arnett

Preclusion of Prior Convictions from Criminal History Scoring When Used to Enhance Sentencing: Kansas v. Arnett

Date: Dec 20, 2008
Preclusion of Prior Convictions from Criminal History Scoring When Used to Enhance Sentencing: Kansas v. Arnett Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. Mary Arnett (223 P.3d 780) presents a...
Mandatory Life Sentences for Sex Crimes: Upholding Legislative Standards in State v. Ortega-Cadelan

Mandatory Life Sentences for Sex Crimes: Upholding Legislative Standards in State v. Ortega-Cadelan

Date: Nov 1, 2008
Mandatory Life Sentences for Sex Crimes: Upholding Legislative Standards in State of Kansas v. Ortega-Cadelan Introduction State of Kansas v. Angelo Ortega-Cadelan, 287 Kan. 157 (2008), is a pivotal...
Admissibility of Spontaneous, Volunteered Statements Without Miranda Warnings Affirmed in Kansas Supreme Court

Admissibility of Spontaneous, Volunteered Statements Without Miranda Warnings Affirmed in Kansas Supreme Court

Date: Aug 9, 2008
Admissibility of Spontaneous, Volunteered Statements Without Miranda Warnings Affirmed in Kansas Supreme Court Introduction In the landmark case State of Kansas v. Ruben Y. Warledo (286 Kan. 927,...
Kansas Supreme Court Reaffirms Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Ranges Under K.S.A. 21-4704(e)(1) Following Apprendi and Cunningham

Kansas Supreme Court Reaffirms Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Ranges Under K.S.A. 21-4704(e)(1) Following Apprendi and Cunningham

Date: Aug 2, 2008
Kansas Supreme Court Reaffirms Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Ranges Under K.S.A. 21-4704(e)(1) Following Apprendi and Cunningham Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Randy J....
Clarifying the 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard in CINC Cases: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Clarifying the 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard in CINC Cases: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Jul 19, 2008
Clarifying the 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard in CINC Cases: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of In the Interest of B.D.-Y., a Child under the Age...
Establishing Strict Disciplinary Standards for Attorneys: The Disbarment of Stephen Jay Dennis

Establishing Strict Disciplinary Standards for Attorneys: The Disbarment of Stephen Jay Dennis

Date: Jul 19, 2008
Establishing Strict Disciplinary Standards for Attorneys: The Disbarment of Stephen Jay Dennis Introduction The Supreme Court of Kansas rendered a landmark decision on July 18, 2008, in the matter of...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Premeditated Murder Cases

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Premeditated Murder Cases

Date: Jul 4, 2008
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Premeditated Murder Cases Introduction The landmark case of State of Kansas v. William Scaife, 286 Kan. 614 (2008),...
Admissibility and Appellate Review Standards for Prior Crimes Evidence under K.S.A. 60-455: State v. Reid

Admissibility and Appellate Review Standards for Prior Crimes Evidence under K.S.A. 60-455: State v. Reid

Date: Jun 28, 2008
Admissibility and Appellate Review Standards for Prior Crimes Evidence under K.S.A. 60-455: State v. Reid Introduction State of Kansas v. Leonard C. Reid (286 Kan. 494) is a pivotal decision by the...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Strict Liability Standards for Traffic Stops Based on Turn Signal Violations

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Strict Liability Standards for Traffic Stops Based on Turn Signal Violations

Date: May 17, 2008
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Strict Liability Standards for Traffic Stops Based on Turn Signal Violations Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. Shanon S. Greever addresses critical issues...
Post-Probation Conduct and Appellate Jurisdiction: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Post-Probation Conduct and Appellate Jurisdiction: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: May 17, 2008
Post-Probation Conduct and Appellate Jurisdiction: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction State of Kansas v. Kenneth R. Skolaut, 286 Kan. 219 (2008), marks a significant decision by the...
State v. Stowell: Reinforcing the Burden of Proof for the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine

State v. Stowell: Reinforcing the Burden of Proof for the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine

Date: May 17, 2008
State v. Stowell: Reinforcing the Burden of Proof for the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine Introduction State of Kansas v. Kelly B. Stowell, 286 Kan. 163 (2008), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Separation of Powers Reinforced: Kansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Judicial Trigger Provision in Funeral Privacy Act

Separation of Powers Reinforced: Kansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Judicial Trigger Provision in Funeral Privacy Act

Date: Mar 12, 2008
Separation of Powers Reinforced: Kansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Judicial Trigger Provision in Funeral Privacy Act Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas ex rel. Paul J. Morrison v....
Exclusion of Constitutional Claims in Administrative Driver's License Hearings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Martin v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Exclusion of Constitutional Claims in Administrative Driver's License Hearings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Martin v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Date: Feb 2, 2008
Exclusion of Constitutional Claims in Administrative Driver's License Hearings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Martin v. Kansas Department of Revenue Introduction The case of Thomas J.G. Martin v....
Statute of Limitations Preservation in Appellate Review: Cooke v. Gillespie

Statute of Limitations Preservation in Appellate Review: Cooke v. Gillespie

Date: Feb 2, 2008
Statute of Limitations Preservation in Appellate Review: Cooke v. Gillespie Introduction Cooke v. Gillespie, 285 Kan. 748 (2008), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kansas, serves as a pivotal case...
Clarifying the Standard of Review for K.S.A. 60-1507 Habeas Corpus Motions in Kansas

Clarifying the Standard of Review for K.S.A. 60-1507 Habeas Corpus Motions in Kansas

Date: Dec 8, 2007
Clarifying the Standard of Review for K.S.A. 60-1507 Habeas Corpus Motions in Kansas Introduction The case of Alex L. Bellamy v. State of Kansas (285 Kan. 346, 2007) serves as a pivotal decision in...
Kansas Upholds K.S.A. 38-1114(f): Presumption of Non-Paternity for Sperm Donors Without Written Agreement

Kansas Upholds K.S.A. 38-1114(f): Presumption of Non-Paternity for Sperm Donors Without Written Agreement

Date: Oct 27, 2007
Kansas Upholds K.S.A. 38-1114(f): Presumption of Non-Paternity for Sperm Donors Without Written Agreement Introduction The Kansas Supreme Court, in the landmark case titled In the Interest of K.M.H.,...
Kansas v. Thompson: Defining Voluntary Consent in Traffic Stops

Kansas v. Thompson: Defining Voluntary Consent in Traffic Stops

Date: Oct 18, 2007
Kansas v. Thompson: Defining Voluntary Consent in Traffic Stops Introduction In State of Kansas v. Dennis W. Thompson, 284 Kan. 763 (2007), the Supreme Court of Kansas addressed pivotal issues...
Strict Compliance with Notice of Appeal Deadlines Essential for Statutory Appeals in Kansas: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Kansas v. Marcus A. Inkelaar

Strict Compliance with Notice of Appeal Deadlines Essential for Statutory Appeals in Kansas: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Kansas v. Marcus A. Inkelaar

Date: Aug 18, 2007
Strict Compliance with Notice of Appeal Deadlines Essential for Statutory Appeals in Kansas: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Kansas v. Marcus A. Inkelaar Introduction State of Kansas v. Marcus...
Enhancing Defendant's Confrontation Rights: Insights from State v. Billy Ray Noah

Enhancing Defendant's Confrontation Rights: Insights from State v. Billy Ray Noah

Date: Jul 28, 2007
Enhancing Defendant's Confrontation Rights: Insights from State of Kansas v. Billy Ray Noah Introduction State of Kansas v. Billy Ray Noah (284 Kan. 608, 2007) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
STATE v. VOYLES: Kansas Supreme Court Adopts 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard for Jury Unanimity in Multiple Acts Cases

STATE v. VOYLES: Kansas Supreme Court Adopts 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard for Jury Unanimity in Multiple Acts Cases

Date: Jun 23, 2007
STATE v. VOYLES: Kansas Supreme Court Adopts 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard for Jury Unanimity in Multiple Acts Cases Introduction State of Kansas v. Marshall M. Voyles, II is a landmark decision...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert