Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kansas Case Commentaries

Affirming 'Willful' Conduct Under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act in Unruh v. Purina Mills

Affirming 'Willful' Conduct Under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act in Unruh v. Purina Mills

Date: Dec 12, 2009
Affirming 'Willful' Conduct Under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act in Unruh v. Purina Mills Introduction The case of Kenneth E. Unruh and Robert K. Carter v. Purina Mills, LLC (289 Kan. 1185)...
State of Kansas v. Ellmaker: Affirmation of Jurisdiction and Sentencing Standards in Juvenile Adult Certification

State of Kansas v. Ellmaker: Affirmation of Jurisdiction and Sentencing Standards in Juvenile Adult Certification

Date: Dec 5, 2009
State of Kansas v. Ellmaker: Affirmation of Jurisdiction and Sentencing Standards in Juvenile Adult Certification Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Andrew Ramey Ellmaker, the...
Supreme Court of Kansas Establishes Procedures for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Habeas Corpus Motions

Supreme Court of Kansas Establishes Procedures for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Habeas Corpus Motions

Date: Nov 21, 2009
Supreme Court of Kansas Establishes Procedures for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Habeas Corpus Motions Introduction In the landmark case of Jerry L. Rowland v. State of Kansas (2009),...
Attorney's Entitlement to Referral Fee upon Withdrawal and Client File Transfer: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Attorney's Entitlement to Referral Fee upon Withdrawal and Client File Transfer: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Oct 31, 2009
Attorney's Entitlement to Referral Fee upon Withdrawal and Client File Transfer: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Shamburg, Johnson Bergman, CHTD., Plaintiff, v....
Clarifying 'Prior Conviction Event' in Aggravated Habitual Sex Offender Statutes: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Clarifying 'Prior Conviction Event' in Aggravated Habitual Sex Offender Statutes: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Oct 10, 2009
Clarifying 'Prior Conviction Event' in Aggravated Habitual Sex Offender Statutes: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Melvin Trautloff (289...
Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Stops under K.S.A. 8-1522(a)

Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Stops under K.S.A. 8-1522(a)

Date: Sep 19, 2009
Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Stops under K.S.A. 8-1522(a) Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Peter J. Marx (289 Kan. 657, 2009), the...
Establishing Due Process Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions for Civilly Committed Sexually Violent Predators

Establishing Due Process Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions for Civilly Committed Sexually Violent Predators

Date: Sep 12, 2009
Establishing Due Process Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions for Civilly Committed Sexually Violent Predators Introduction The case of Edward C. Johnson and Chase C. Collins v. State of Kansas,...
Supreme Court of Kansas Reaffirms Statutory Clarity in Workers' Compensation: Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing

Supreme Court of Kansas Reaffirms Statutory Clarity in Workers' Compensation: Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing

Date: Sep 5, 2009
Supreme Court of Kansas Reaffirms Statutory Clarity in Workers' Compensation: Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Introduction In Carolyn Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Company and Zurich U.S....
Clarifying the Role of Nominee Entities in Foreclosure Actions: LANDMARK NATIONAL BANK v. KESLER

Clarifying the Role of Nominee Entities in Foreclosure Actions: LANDMARK NATIONAL BANK v. KESLER

Date: Aug 29, 2009
Clarifying the Role of Nominee Entities in Foreclosure Actions: LANDMARK NATIONAL BANK v. KESLER Introduction The Supreme Court of Kansas, in the landmark case Landmark National Bank,...
Preservation of Evidentiary Objections and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials: Insights from State of Kansas v. Albert Eugene Richmond

Preservation of Evidentiary Objections and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials: Insights from State of Kansas v. Albert Eugene Richmond

Date: Jul 25, 2009
Preservation of Evidentiary Objections and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials: Insights from State of Kansas v. Albert Eugene Richmond Introduction State of Kansas v. Albert Eugene Richmond,...
Appellate Review Standards for Mistrials and Jury Instructions in Felony-Murder Cases: STATE v. DIXON

Appellate Review Standards for Mistrials and Jury Instructions in Felony-Murder Cases: STATE v. DIXON

Date: Jun 20, 2009
Appellate Review Standards for Mistrials and Jury Instructions in Felony-Murder Cases: STATE v. DIXON Introduction State of Kansas v. Wallace L. Dixon III, 209 P.3d 675 (2009), adjudicated by the...
Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Terence A. Lober: Establishing Strict Standards for Legal Representation

Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Terence A. Lober: Establishing Strict Standards for Legal Representation

Date: Apr 4, 2009
Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Terence A. Lober: Establishing Strict Standards for Legal Representation Introduction The Supreme Court of Kansas issued a significant ruling on April 3, 2009, in...
Preservation of Evidentiary Claims: Insights from State v. King

Preservation of Evidentiary Claims: Insights from State v. King

Date: Mar 28, 2009
Preservation of Evidentiary Claims: Insights from State of Kansas v. William Bradley King Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. William Bradley King (288 Kan. 333, 2009) represents a pivotal...
Strict Compliance Required for Judicial Review Under KJRA: Kingsley v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

Strict Compliance Required for Judicial Review Under KJRA: Kingsley v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

Date: Mar 28, 2009
Strict Compliance Required for Judicial Review Under KJRA: Kingsley v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue Introduction Joshua Hamlin Kingsley v. Kansas Department of Revenue is a pivotal case heard by the...
Strict Interpretation of Statutory Duties in Utility Excavation: Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corporation Commission

Strict Interpretation of Statutory Duties in Utility Excavation: Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corporation Commission

Date: Feb 7, 2009
Strict Interpretation of Statutory Duties in Utility Excavation: Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corporation Commission Introduction The case of Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corporation...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in K.S.A. 60-1507 Proceedings: Analysis of Robertson v. State of Kansas

Effective Assistance of Counsel in K.S.A. 60-1507 Proceedings: Analysis of Robertson v. State of Kansas

Date: Feb 7, 2009
Effective Assistance of Counsel in K.S.A. 60-1507 Proceedings: Analysis of Robertson v. State of Kansas Introduction In the landmark case of Joshua Robertson v. State of Kansas, 288 Kan. 217 (2009),...
Implied Warranty of Merchantability in Used Car Sales: HODGES v. JOHNSON Establishes Broader Coverage

Implied Warranty of Merchantability in Used Car Sales: HODGES v. JOHNSON Establishes Broader Coverage

Date: Jan 31, 2009
Implied Warranty of Merchantability in Used Car Sales: HODGES v. JOHNSON Establishes Broader Coverage Introduction In the landmark case HODGES v. JOHNSON, the Supreme Court of Kansas addressed...
Clarifying Standards for Admission of Confessions Post-Counsel Requests: State v. Gant

Clarifying Standards for Admission of Confessions Post-Counsel Requests: State v. Gant

Date: Jan 31, 2009
Clarifying Standards for Admission of Confessions Post-Counsel Requests: State of Kansas v. Christopher D. Gant Introduction State of Kansas v. Christopher D. Gant, 288 Kan. 76 (2009), is a pivotal...
Multiplicative Convictions in Capital Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. TROTTER

Multiplicative Convictions in Capital Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. TROTTER

Date: Jan 31, 2009
Multiplicative Convictions in Capital Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. TROTTER Introduction State v. Christopher M. Trotter is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Kansas, delivered on...
Life Sentencing Standards under K.S.A. 21-4643: An Analysis of State v. James M. Thomas

Life Sentencing Standards under K.S.A. 21-4643: An Analysis of State v. James M. Thomas

Date: Jan 31, 2009
Life Sentencing Standards under K.S.A. 21-4643: An Analysis of State v. James M. Thomas Introduction In State of Kansas v. James M. Thomas, 199 P.3d 1265 (Kan. 2009), the Supreme Court of Kansas...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert