Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kansas Case Commentaries

Continuance Standards and Prosecutorial Misconduct: Insights from State v. Carter

Continuance Standards and Prosecutorial Misconduct: Insights from State v. Carter

Date: Jun 9, 2007
Continuance Standards and Prosecutorial Misconduct: Insights from State of Kansas v. Victor Andre Carter Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Victor Andre Carter, 284 Kan. 312...
Affirming Strict Standards for Impeachment: The Application of K.S.A. 60-421 in STATE v. WOOLVERTON

Affirming Strict Standards for Impeachment: The Application of K.S.A. 60-421 in STATE v. WOOLVERTON

Date: Jun 9, 2007
Affirming Strict Standards for Impeachment: The Application of K.S.A. 60-421 in State of Kansas v. Woolverton Supreme Court of Kansas, 2007 Introduction In State of Kansas v. Ian Woolverton, 284 Kan....
Reaffirming the Secondary Injury Rule and Overruling the Parallel Injury Rule in Workers' Compensation: The Alejandro Casco Case

Reaffirming the Secondary Injury Rule and Overruling the Parallel Injury Rule in Workers' Compensation: The Alejandro Casco Case

Date: Mar 24, 2007
Reaffirming the Secondary Injury Rule and Overruling the Parallel Injury Rule in Workers' Compensation: The Alejandro Casco Case Introduction The case of Alejandro Casco v. Armour Swift-Eckrich (154...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Clear Guidelines on Confrontation Clause and BIDS Fee Assessments in STATE OF KANSAS v. BRELAND D. DAVIS

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Clear Guidelines on Confrontation Clause and BIDS Fee Assessments in STATE OF KANSAS v. BRELAND D. DAVIS

Date: Mar 24, 2007
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Clear Guidelines on Confrontation Clause and BIDS Fee Assessments in STATE OF KANSAS v. BRELAND D. DAVIS Introduction In the landmark case STATE OF KANSAS v. BRELAND...
STATE v. WALKER (2007): Kansas Supreme Court on Double Jeopardy and Cumulative Sentencing

STATE v. WALKER (2007): Kansas Supreme Court on Double Jeopardy and Cumulative Sentencing

Date: Mar 24, 2007
STATE v. WALKER (2007): Kansas Supreme Court on Double Jeopardy and Cumulative Sentencing Introduction State of Kansas v. Michael D. Walker, 153 P.3d 1257 (2007), is a seminal case decided by the...
Affirming Trial Court's Discretion on Withdrawal of No Contest Plea: Insights from State v. Shopteese

Affirming Trial Court's Discretion on Withdrawal of No Contest Plea: Insights from State v. Shopteese

Date: Mar 17, 2007
Affirming Trial Court's Discretion on Withdrawal of No Contest Plea: Insights from State of Kansas v. Larry Shopteese, Jr. Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. Larry Shopteese, Jr. (283 Kan....
Assessing Effective Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Habeas Corpus Reviews: Insights from STATE v. BLEDSOE

Assessing Effective Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Habeas Corpus Reviews: Insights from STATE v. BLEDSOE

Date: Feb 3, 2007
Assessing Effective Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Habeas Corpus Reviews: Insights from STATE v. BLEDSOE Introduction The landmark case STATE v. BLEDSOE (272 Kan. 1350, 150 P.3d 868) serves as...
Merriman v. Crompton: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes General Jurisdiction over Foreign Corporations in Antitrust Violations

Merriman v. Crompton: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes General Jurisdiction over Foreign Corporations in Antitrust Violations

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Merriman v. Crompton: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes General Jurisdiction over Foreign Corporations in Antitrust Violations Introduction Merriman v. Crompton Corporation et al. is a landmark case...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines for Admissibility of Prior Crimes Evidence in State v. Gunby

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines for Admissibility of Prior Crimes Evidence in State v. Gunby

Date: Oct 28, 2006
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines for Admissibility of Prior Crimes Evidence in State v. Gunby Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Kevin W. Gunby (282 Kan. 39,...
Affirmation of Appellate Court's Interpretation of Probation Revocation Standards in STATE v. GARY

Affirmation of Appellate Court's Interpretation of Probation Revocation Standards in STATE v. GARY

Date: Oct 28, 2006
Affirmation of Appellate Court's Interpretation of Probation Revocation Standards in STATE v. GARY Introduction State of Kansas v. Lorenzo C. Gary, 282 Kan. 232 (2006), represents a significant...
State of Kansas v. Ngan Pham: Comprehensive Analysis on Batson Challenges and Multiplicity in Criminal Convictions

State of Kansas v. Ngan Pham: Comprehensive Analysis on Batson Challenges and Multiplicity in Criminal Convictions

Date: Jun 17, 2006
State of Kansas v. Ngan Pham: Comprehensive Analysis on Batson Challenges and Multiplicity in Criminal Convictions Introduction State of Kansas v. Ngan Pham, decided by the Supreme Court of Kansas on...
Probation Revocation Flexibility Affirmed: State of Kansas v. Gumfory

Probation Revocation Flexibility Affirmed: State of Kansas v. Gumfory

Date: Jun 10, 2006
Probation Revocation Flexibility Affirmed: State of Kansas v. Gumfory Introduction In State of Kansas v. Jason Martin Gumfory, 281 Kan. 1168 (2006), the Supreme Court of Kansas addressed the...
JOHNSON v. WESTHOFF SAND CO.: Kansas Supreme Court Defines Parameters for Attorney Fee Awards Under K.S.A. 40-256

JOHNSON v. WESTHOFF SAND CO.: Kansas Supreme Court Defines Parameters for Attorney Fee Awards Under K.S.A. 40-256

Date: Jun 10, 2006
JOHNSON v. WESTHOFF SAND CO.: Kansas Supreme Court Defines Parameters for Attorney Fee Awards Under K.S.A. 40-256 Introduction In the landmark case of J. Michelle Johnson and Alan L. JOHNSON v....
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Same-Elements Test Over Single Act/Merger Doctrine for Double Jeopardy in Multiplicity Cases

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Same-Elements Test Over Single Act/Merger Doctrine for Double Jeopardy in Multiplicity Cases

Date: Apr 29, 2006
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Same-Elements Test Over Single Act/Merger Doctrine for Double Jeopardy in Multiplicity Cases Introduction In the landmark case State of Kansas v. Scott E. Schoonover,...
Assessment of BIDS Fees: Robinson v. State of Kansas

Assessment of BIDS Fees: Robinson v. State of Kansas

Date: Apr 29, 2006
Assessment of BIDS Fees: Robinson v. State of Kansas Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. Timothy A. Robinson, II (281 Kan. 538) serves as a pivotal precedent in Kansas criminal law,...
Kansas Supreme Court Rules: Awareness Not Required for Lewd and Lascivious Behavior

Kansas Supreme Court Rules: Awareness Not Required for Lewd and Lascivious Behavior

Date: Mar 18, 2006
Kansas Supreme Court Rules: Awareness Not Required for Lewd and Lascivious Behavior Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Randy Bryan, the Supreme Court of Kansas addressed pivotal...
Discretionary Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas in Kansas: Insights from State of Kansas v. Edgar

Discretionary Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas in Kansas: Insights from State of Kansas v. Edgar

Date: Feb 11, 2006
Discretionary Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas in Kansas: Insights from State of Kansas v. Edgar Introduction State of Kansas v. Christy Edgar is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Kansas on...
State v. Ackward: Reinforcing the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine and Confession Voluntariness in Kansas Jurisprudence

State v. Ackward: Reinforcing the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine and Confession Voluntariness in Kansas Jurisprudence

Date: Feb 11, 2006
State v. Ackward: Reinforcing the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine and Confession Voluntariness in Kansas Jurisprudence Introduction State of Kansas v. Word Ackward, Jr., 281 Kan. 2 (2006), is a pivotal...
Permissible Jury Crime Scene Views and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from State v. Engelhardt

Permissible Jury Crime Scene Views and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from State v. Engelhardt

Date: Sep 17, 2005
Permissible Jury Crime Scene Views and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from State v. Engelhardt Introduction State of Kansas v. Robert J. Engelhardt is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
State v. Robertson: Affirmation of Right to Counsel Invocation and Upholding Kansas Hard 50 Sentencing Scheme

State v. Robertson: Affirmation of Right to Counsel Invocation and Upholding Kansas Hard 50 Sentencing Scheme

Date: Apr 23, 2005
State v. Robertson: Affirmation of Right to Counsel Invocation and Upholding Kansas Hard 50 Sentencing Scheme Introduction State of Kansas v. Joshua James Robertson, 279 Kan. 291 (2005), represents a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert