Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Acquiescence by Acceptance: Kansas Supreme Court Limits Void‑Judgment Claims and Recognizes Standalone Appellate Fee Jurisdiction Introduction In Tharrett v. Everett, the Kansas Supreme Court...
Indefinite Suspension with Mandatory Restitution for Dishonest Post-Error Conduct: In re McDowell Introduction In re McDowell is a Kansas Supreme Court attorney discipline decision arising from a...
State v. Holt (Kan. 2025): Fact-Based Gatekeeping for Postconviction DNA Testing Under K.S.A. 21-2512(c) Introduction In State v. Holt, the Kansas Supreme Court clarifies an important threshold rule...
State v. Hogan: Prior-Acts Evidence Under K.S.A. 60-455 Is Inadmissible Without Proof the Defendant Committed the Prior Acts Introduction In State v. Hogan, No. 126,442 (Kan. Aug. 1, 2025), the...
State v. Alvarado-Meraz: Proof That a Jury Question Reached the Court Is Required to Trigger Right-to-Be-Present Protections; Wide Latitude in Closing and Robust Gatekeeping on Voluntary Manslaughter...
THC Testing Not Required to Prove “Marijuana”; Attempted Sale Counts as “Distribution,” and Felony-Murder Res Gestae Encompasses a Continuous Drug-Deal Transaction — Commentary on State v. Brown...
One Violation Is Enough: Mandatory EJJP Revocation and Nonmodifiable Adult Sentences in Kansas Commentary on In re D.J., No. 127,414 (Kan. Aug. 1, 2025) Introduction In re D.J. is a significant...
State v. McNeal: Kansas Clarifies Paths to Prove Fair-Cross-Section Claims, Rejects Race‑Switching Implicit‑Bias Instructions, and Reaffirms the Low Threshold for Miranda Waivers Introduction In...
Mandatory Romeo-and-Juliet Screening and Narrow “Sexually Explicit Conduct” Definition for Under‑19 Sexting Cases: State v. Grant (Kan. 2025) Introduction In State v. Grant, the Supreme Court of...
“Proffer Is Not Evidence”: Kansas Supreme Court Limits K.S.A. 38-2248(f) and Bars Termination of Parental Rights Based on Proffer Alone Introduction In In re A.K., No. 127,259 (Kan. July 18, 2025),...
State v. Cherry: COVID‑19 Delays Weighed Neutrally in Barker Analysis; Trial Judges Have Discretion Over the Duration of Displaying Admitted Exhibits Court: Supreme Court of Kansas Date: July 18,...
Lockdown, Then Consent: Kansas High Court Upholds Premises Security Pending Warrant and Validates Nonverbal Consent to Home Entry Case: State v. Arredondo (No. 126,819) — Supreme Court of Kansas —...
State v. Haynes: A Defendant’s Direct-Motion Right to Obtain Warrant Affidavits—But Not Warrants—Under K.S.A. 22-2302(b) and 22-2502(d) Introduction In State v. Haynes (Kan. July 3, 2025), the Kansas...
Kansas adopts a rebuttable “presumed prejudice” standard under Section 5 for jury-instruction omissions of an element Introduction In State v. Gleason, No. 125,156 (Kan. July 3, 2025), the Supreme...
State v. Mitchell: Kansas Supreme Court Confirms Broad Discretion to Deny Hard-25 Departure and to Impose Consecutive Hard-50 Sentences for Multiple Victims Introduction In State v. Mitchell, No....
Arbitrary-Enforcement Vagueness Challenges Are Inherently Facial and Defendants Have Standing: State v. Stubbs Recasts Kansas Standing Doctrine Introduction In State v. Stubbs, No. 125,003 (Kan. June...
Open Area Means Open to the Public: Kansas Supreme Court Affirms Recreational-Use Immunity for Indoor Libraries and Integral Areas, and Bars New Issues in Post‑Grant Supplemental Briefs Introduction...
No Prudential Exceptions: Mootness Is a Jurisdictional Bar in Kansas — State v. Phipps (Kan. 2025) Introduction In State v. Phipps, the Kansas Supreme Court announced a sweeping recalibration of the...
State v. Wash: Strict Limits on Prosecutorial Argument—Violations of Orders in Limine and “We Know” Statements Are Error; Timely Objection Required for Evidentiary-Based Missteps Introduction In...