Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Idaho Case Commentaries

Shane McKay v. State of Idaho: Establishing Precedent on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Vehicular Manslaughter Cases

Shane McKay v. State of Idaho: Establishing Precedent on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Vehicular Manslaughter Cases

Date: Jan 30, 2010
Shane McKay v. State of Idaho: Establishing Precedent on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Vehicular Manslaughter Cases Introduction The case of Shane McKay v. State of Idaho is a pivotal decision...
Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Ordinance on Exotic Animal Possession

Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Ordinance on Exotic Animal Possession

Date: Dec 25, 2009
Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Ordinance on Exotic Animal Possession Introduction In the landmark case State of Idaho v. Jerome L. Korn, the Supreme Court of Idaho addressed critical issues surrounding...
Reaffirmation of Best Interest Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: Doe v. Doe II

Reaffirmation of Best Interest Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: Doe v. Doe II

Date: Dec 23, 2009
Reaffirmation of Best Interest Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: Doe v. Doe II Introduction The Supreme Court of Idaho, in the case of Jane DOE and John DOE I v. John DOE II (148 Idaho...
Supreme Court of Idaho Affirms Custody Decision, Reinforcing Standards for Pro Se Litigants

Supreme Court of Idaho Affirms Custody Decision, Reinforcing Standards for Pro Se Litigants

Date: Nov 21, 2009
Supreme Court of Idaho Affirms Custody Decision, Reinforcing Standards for Pro Se Litigants Introduction The case of Arthur William Michalk v. Wendi Lee Michalk (No. 35221) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Limits to Equitable Tolling in Post-Conviction Relief: Analyzing Rhoades v. State of Idaho

Limits to Equitable Tolling in Post-Conviction Relief: Analyzing Rhoades v. State of Idaho

Date: Oct 27, 2009
Limits to Equitable Tolling in Post-Conviction Relief: Analyzing Rhoades v. State of Idaho Introduction The case of Paul Rhoades v. State of Idaho addresses critical issues surrounding...
Idaho Supreme Court Limits Rule 35: Prohibits Evidentiary Review for Illegal Sentences

Idaho Supreme Court Limits Rule 35: Prohibits Evidentiary Review for Illegal Sentences

Date: Oct 16, 2009
Idaho Supreme Court Limits Rule 35: Prohibition of Evidentiary Review for Illegal Sentences Introduction The case of State of Idaho v. Michael Edwin Clements, 148 Idaho 82 (2009), adjudicated by the...
State v. Severson: Defining Conflict of Interest Standards in Public Defense Services

State v. Severson: Defining Conflict of Interest Standards in Public Defense Services

Date: Aug 25, 2009
State v. Severson: Defining Conflict of Interest Standards in Public Defense Services Introduction The case of State of Idaho v. Larry M. Severson presents a significant legal examination of conflict...
Allocation of Settlements and Medicaid Reimbursement: Insights from Idaho Supreme Court's Decision in In re Jess C. Matey

Allocation of Settlements and Medicaid Reimbursement: Insights from Idaho Supreme Court's Decision in In re Jess C. Matey

Date: Jul 10, 2009
Allocation of Settlements and Medicaid Reimbursement: Insights from Idaho Supreme Court's Decision in In the Matter of the Person of Jess C. Matey Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Person...
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Whistleblower Act Claims Not Subject to ITCA Notice Requirements

Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Whistleblower Act Claims Not Subject to ITCA Notice Requirements

Date: Jul 8, 2009
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Whistleblower Act Claims Not Subject to ITCA Notice Requirements Introduction In the landmark case Mark Van v. Portneuf Medical Center et al. (147 Idaho 552), the...
Admissibility of Prior Sexual Misconduct in Child Sex Crime Cases: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies I.R.E. 404(b) Application

Admissibility of Prior Sexual Misconduct in Child Sex Crime Cases: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies I.R.E. 404(b) Application

Date: Apr 21, 2009
Admissibility of Prior Sexual Misconduct in Child Sex Crime Cases: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies I.R.E. 404(b) Application Introduction The case of State of Idaho v. Harold E. Grist, Jr. (147 Idaho...
Dixson v. Banner Life: Unconstitutional Gender Classification and Application of Risk Payment Theory in Life Insurance Disputes

Dixson v. Banner Life: Unconstitutional Gender Classification and Application of Risk Payment Theory in Life Insurance Disputes

Date: Apr 4, 2009
Dixson v. Banner Life: Unconstitutional Gender Classification and Application of Risk Payment Theory in Life Insurance Disputes Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court, in the landmark case Dixson v....
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion from Informant Tips and the Lawfulness of Arrests Following Unlawful Frisk: State v. Bishop

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion from Informant Tips and the Lawfulness of Arrests Following Unlawful Frisk: State v. Bishop

Date: Mar 14, 2009
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion from Informant Tips and the Lawfulness of Arrests Following Unlawful Frisk: State v. Bishop Introduction In State of Idaho v. Shane Marvin Bishop, 146 Idaho 804...
Establishing Clear Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights: Doe v. Department of Health and Welfare

Establishing Clear Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights: Doe v. Department of Health and Welfare

Date: Mar 5, 2009
Establishing Clear Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights: Doe v. Department of Health and Welfare Introduction Doe v. Department of Health and Welfare is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Defendant’s Constitutional Right to Testify in Post-Conviction Proceedings

Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Defendant’s Constitutional Right to Testify in Post-Conviction Proceedings

Date: Jan 23, 2009
Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Defendant’s Constitutional Right to Testify in Post-Conviction Proceedings Introduction The case of William Kris DeRushé v. State of Idaho (146 Idaho 599) presents a...
Impact of Inadmissible Victim Impact Statements on Capital Sentencing: STATE of Idaho v. Darrell Edward Payne

Impact of Inadmissible Victim Impact Statements on Capital Sentencing: STATE of Idaho v. Darrell Edward Payne

Date: Dec 16, 2008
Impact of Inadmissible Victim Impact Statements on Capital Sentencing: STATE of Idaho v. Darrell Edward Payne Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Idaho v. Darrell Edward Payne, the Supreme...
Impact of Vacating Restitution on Ineffective Assistance Claims: HAYES v. STATE of Idaho

Impact of Vacating Restitution on Ineffective Assistance Claims: HAYES v. STATE of Idaho

Date: Nov 13, 2008
Impact of Vacating Restitution on Ineffective Assistance Claims: HAYES v. STATE of Idaho Introduction HAYES v. STATE of Idaho is a pivotal case that addresses the boundaries of claims regarding...
Defining Lien Interests in Divorce Property Settlements: Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Personal Property Classification

Defining Lien Interests in Divorce Property Settlements: Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Personal Property Classification

Date: Aug 27, 2008
Defining Lien Interests in Divorce Property Settlements: Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Personal Property Classification Introduction The case of Debra K. Chavez v. William J. Barrus, First American...
Idaho Court Sets Precedent on Prejudice Requirement in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Idaho Court Sets Precedent on Prejudice Requirement in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Aug 12, 2008
Idaho Court Sets Precedent on Prejudice Requirement in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Billy G. Sheahan v. State of Idaho, the Court of Appeals of Idaho...
State v. Stevens: Idaho Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Newly Discovered Evidence and Evidence Admissibility Standards

State v. Stevens: Idaho Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Newly Discovered Evidence and Evidence Admissibility Standards

Date: Jul 24, 2008
State v. Stevens: Idaho Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Newly Discovered Evidence and Evidence Admissibility Standards Introduction In the landmark case of State of Idaho v. Edward John Stevens (146...
Clarifying the Separate Duties to Defend and Indemnify in Insurance Law: Deluna v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Clarifying the Separate Duties to Defend and Indemnify in Insurance Law: Deluna v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Date: Jul 2, 2008
Clarifying the Separate Duties to Defend and Indemnify in Insurance Law: Deluna v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Introduction Deluna v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert