Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Idaho Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Procedural Bar on Raising Constitutional Issues on Appeal: Sanchez v. Arave

Reaffirmation of Procedural Bar on Raising Constitutional Issues on Appeal: Sanchez v. Arave

Date: Jul 30, 1991
Reaffirmation of Procedural Bar on Raising Constitutional Issues on Appeal: Sanchez v. Arave Introduction Sanchez v. Arave (Supreme Court of Idaho, 1991) presents a pivotal case concerning the...
State of Idaho v. Gerald Ross Pizzuto Jr.: Establishing Precedents on Double Jeopardy and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases

State of Idaho v. Gerald Ross Pizzuto Jr.: Establishing Precedents on Double Jeopardy and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases

Date: Jun 6, 1991
State of Idaho v. Gerald Ross Pizzuto Jr.: Establishing Precedents on Double Jeopardy and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases Introduction The case of State of Idaho v. Gerald Ross Pizzuto Jr....
State of Idaho v. Barrette Enno: Upholding Jury Selection Protocols and Fixed-Life Sentencing in First-Degree Murder Conviction

State of Idaho v. Barrette Enno: Upholding Jury Selection Protocols and Fixed-Life Sentencing in First-Degree Murder Conviction

Date: Apr 9, 1991
State of Idaho v. Barrette Enno: Upholding Jury Selection Protocols and Fixed-Life Sentencing in First-Degree Murder Conviction Introduction The case of State of Idaho v. Barrette Luke Enno (119...
Intentional Misrepresentation and Summary Judgment Standards: Insights from G M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Company

Intentional Misrepresentation and Summary Judgment Standards: Insights from G M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Company

Date: Mar 20, 1991
Intentional Misrepresentation and Summary Judgment Standards: Insights from G M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Company Introduction In the landmark case of G M Farms, a partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, v....
Definiteness in Oral Contracts for SBA-Guaranteed Loans: Insights from Black Canyon Racquetball Club v. Idaho First National Bank

Definiteness in Oral Contracts for SBA-Guaranteed Loans: Insights from Black Canyon Racquetball Club v. Idaho First National Bank

Date: Jan 10, 1991
Definiteness in Oral Contracts for SBA-Guaranteed Loans: Insights from Black Canyon Racquetball Club, Inc. v. Idaho First National Bank Introduction The case of Black Canyon Racquetball Club, Inc.,...
Abuse of Discretion Standard for Rule 11 Sanctions in Idaho: SUN VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER Inc. v. Idaho Power Company

Abuse of Discretion Standard for Rule 11 Sanctions in Idaho: SUN VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER Inc. v. Idaho Power Company

Date: Jan 3, 1991
Abuse of Discretion Standard for Rule 11 Sanctions in Idaho: SUN VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER Inc. v. Idaho Power Company Introduction The case of SUN VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER, Inc. d/b/a Atkinson's Market...
Protection of Attorney-Client Communications: Insights from STUART v. STATE of Idaho

Protection of Attorney-Client Communications: Insights from STUART v. STATE of Idaho

Date: Nov 29, 1990
Protection of Attorney-Client Communications: Insights from STUART v. STATE of Idaho Introduction The case of Gene Francis STUART v. STATE of Idaho serves as a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Res Judicata and Limits of Post-Conviction Relief: Stuart v. State of Idaho

Affirmation of Res Judicata and Limits of Post-Conviction Relief: Stuart v. State of Idaho

Date: Oct 17, 1990
Affirmation of Res Judicata and Limits of Post-Conviction Relief: Stuart v. State of Idaho Introduction Gene Francis Stuart was convicted of first-degree murder by torture, culminating in the deaths...
Accrual Date Determines Post-Judgment Interest Rate: Insights from GEORGE W. WATKINS FAMILY v. MESSENGER

Accrual Date Determines Post-Judgment Interest Rate: Insights from GEORGE W. WATKINS FAMILY v. MESSENGER

Date: Sep 25, 1990
Accrual Date Determines Post-Judgment Interest Rate: Insights from GEORGE W. WATKINS FAMILY v. MESSENGER Introduction The case of GEORGE W. WATKINS FAMILY v. MESSENGER adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirming Burden of Causation and Evidence Standards in Workers' Compensation: Hagler v. Micron Technology

Affirming Burden of Causation and Evidence Standards in Workers' Compensation: Hagler v. Micron Technology

Date: Sep 22, 1990
Affirming Burden of Causation and Evidence Standards in Workers' Compensation Hagler v. Micron Technology, Inc., 118 Idaho 596 (1990) Introduction The case of Elsie M. Hagler v. Micron Technology,...
Jones v. Panhandle: Establishing Standards for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict in Breach of Contract Cases

Jones v. Panhandle: Establishing Standards for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict in Breach of Contract Cases

Date: Jun 21, 1990
Jones v. Panhandle: Establishing Standards for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict in Breach of Contract Cases Introduction Jones v. Panhandle is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Idaho...
Idaho Supreme Court Validates Rebuttable Statute of Repose for Product Liability under I.C. § 6-1403

Idaho Supreme Court Validates Rebuttable Statute of Repose for Product Liability under I.C. § 6-1403

Date: May 8, 1990
Idaho Supreme Court Validates Rebuttable Statute of Repose for Product Liability under I.C. § 6-1403 Introduction Da v. d Olsen (117 Idaho 706) is a seminal judgment by the Supreme Court of Idaho...
Reaffirming Appellate Jurisdiction Standards: Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Samuel M. Lee

Reaffirming Appellate Jurisdiction Standards: Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Samuel M. Lee

Date: Feb 2, 1990
Reaffirming Appellate Jurisdiction Standards: Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Samuel M. Lee Introduction In the landmark case STATE of Idaho v. Samuel M. Lee, 117 Idaho 203 (1990), the Court of...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures and Right to Counsel in Idaho: An In-depth Analysis of STATE v. Mark Henry Lankford

Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures and Right to Counsel in Idaho: An In-depth Analysis of STATE v. Mark Henry Lankford

Date: Nov 1, 1989
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures and Right to Counsel in Idaho: An In-depth Analysis of STATE v. Mark Henry Lankford Introduction STATE of Idaho v. Mark Henry Lankford is a pivotal case...
Miles v. Idaho Power Company: Subordination of Water Rights and Utility Regulation

Miles v. Idaho Power Company: Subordination of Water Rights and Utility Regulation

Date: Aug 9, 1989
Miles v. Idaho Power Company: Subordination of Water Rights and Utility Regulation Introduction The case of Harold C. Miles, Individually and on Behalf of all Ratepayers of the Idaho Power Company,...
Affirmation of Conviction in State v. Hedger: Interpretation of Evidence Rules in Criminal Proceedings

Affirmation of Conviction in State v. Hedger: Interpretation of Evidence Rules in Criminal Proceedings

Date: Feb 11, 1989
Affirmation of Conviction in State v. Hedger: Interpretation of Evidence Rules in Criminal Proceedings Introduction State of Idaho v. Marvin Dee Hedger is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reaffirmation of Objective Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel and Defendant's Right to Testify in Aragon v. State of Idaho

Reaffirmation of Objective Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel and Defendant's Right to Testify in Aragon v. State of Idaho

Date: Aug 26, 1988
Reaffirmation of Objective Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel and Defendant's Right to Testify in Aragon v. State of Idaho Introduction The case of Mark Emilio Aragon v. State of Idaho,...
Adequate Procedural Notice in Probation Revocations: Analysis of STATE of Idaho v. Gregory E. Hass

Adequate Procedural Notice in Probation Revocations: Analysis of STATE of Idaho v. Gregory E. Hass

Date: Jul 28, 1988
Adequate Procedural Notice in Probation Revocations: Analysis of STATE of Idaho v. Gregory E. Hass Introduction In the case of STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gregory E. Hass,...
Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. v. Young and Western Seeds: Defining Landowner Rights in Share-Crop Lease Agreements

Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. v. Young and Western Seeds: Defining Landowner Rights in Share-Crop Lease Agreements

Date: Feb 14, 1987
Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. v. Young and Western Seeds: Defining Landowner Rights in Share-Crop Lease Agreements Introduction In the landmark case of Northwestern National Life Insurance...
Establishing the Applicability of Collateral Estoppel in §1983 Claims: Anderson v. City of Pocatello

Establishing the Applicability of Collateral Estoppel in §1983 Claims: Anderson v. City of Pocatello

Date: Jan 29, 1987
Establishing the Applicability of Collateral Estoppel in §1983 Claims: Anderson v. City of Pocatello Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Anderson v. City of Pocatello, decided on January 28,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert