Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Idaho Case Commentaries

Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Cocaine Trafficking Cases

Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Cocaine Trafficking Cases

Date: Jun 16, 1995
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Cocaine Trafficking Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State of Idaho v. Arturo Valdez-Molina and Marciano...
Strict Adherence to ITCA Notice Requirements Affirmed in Friel v. Boise City Housing Authority

Strict Adherence to ITCA Notice Requirements Affirmed in Friel v. Boise City Housing Authority

Date: Jan 20, 1995
Strict Adherence to ITCA Notice Requirements Affirmed in Friel v. Boise City Housing Authority Introduction The case of Bertha Friel v. Boise City Housing Authority (BCHA) addresses critical issues...
Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief: Roman v. State of Idaho

Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief: Roman v. State of Idaho

Date: Jun 4, 1994
Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief: Roman v. State of Idaho Introduction In the landmark case of Alfredo Holquin Roman v. State of Idaho, the Court of Appeals of Idaho...
Compliance with Federal Agricultural Credit Act Notice Requirements: Insights from Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Stevenson

Compliance with Federal Agricultural Credit Act Notice Requirements: Insights from Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Stevenson

Date: Feb 25, 1994
Compliance with Federal Agricultural Credit Act Notice Requirements: Insights from Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Stevenson Introduction The case of Farm Credit Bank of Spokane, successor in merger,...
Raudebaugh v. State of Idaho: Upholding Acquittal First Instructions and Evidentiary Rulings

Raudebaugh v. State of Idaho: Upholding Acquittal First Instructions and Evidentiary Rulings

Date: Dec 30, 1993
Raudebaugh v. State of Idaho: Upholding Acquittal First Instructions and Evidentiary Rulings Introduction In the landmark case of State of Idaho v. Thomas D. Raudebaugh, the Supreme Court of Idaho...
Idaho Supreme Court Abandons 'Good Faith' Exception to Exclusionary Rule

Idaho Supreme Court Abandons 'Good Faith' Exception to Exclusionary Rule

Date: Nov 6, 1992
Idaho Supreme Court Abandons 'Good Faith' Exception to Exclusionary Rule Introduction The State of Idaho v. Jose Guzman decision, rendered by the Supreme Court of Idaho on November 5, 1992, marks a...
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Punitive Damages and Ratification in Medical Malpractice Cases

Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Punitive Damages and Ratification in Medical Malpractice Cases

Date: Jun 18, 1992
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Punitive Damages and Ratification in Medical Malpractice Cases Introduction The Supreme Court of Idaho, in the case of Manning v. Twin Falls Clinic...
Establishing the Burden in Challenging Warrant Validity: Insights from State v. Peightal

Establishing the Burden in Challenging Warrant Validity: Insights from State v. Peightal

Date: May 2, 1992
Establishing the Burden in Challenging Warrant Validity: Insights from State v. Peightal Introduction State of Idaho v. Michael Peightal, 122 Idaho 5 (1992), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Refining Hearsay Admissibility in Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from State v. Zimmerman

Refining Hearsay Admissibility in Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from State v. Zimmerman

Date: Apr 3, 1992
Refining Hearsay Admissibility in Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from State v. Zimmerman Introduction State of Idaho v. John Asa Zimmerman, 121 Idaho 971 (1992), presents a pivotal resolution in the...
Murray v. State of Idaho: Establishing Boundaries on Post-Conviction Relief and Counsel's Responsibilities

Murray v. State of Idaho: Establishing Boundaries on Post-Conviction Relief and Counsel's Responsibilities

Date: Apr 1, 1992
Murray v. State of Idaho: Establishing Boundaries on Post-Conviction Relief and Counsel's Responsibilities Introduction Murray v. State of Idaho (121 Idaho 918, 1992) is a pivotal case decided by the...
Procedural Defaults in Guilty Plea Admissions: Precedents and Implications from STATE v. LAVY

Procedural Defaults in Guilty Plea Admissions: Precedents and Implications from STATE v. LAVY

Date: Mar 27, 1992
Procedural Defaults in Guilty Plea Admissions: Precedents and Implications from STATE v. LAVY Introduction State of Idaho v. William Rankin Lavy, 121 Idaho 842 (1992), represents a pivotal case in...
Idaho Supreme Court Reaffirms Abolishment of Insanity Defense and Validity of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases

Idaho Supreme Court Reaffirms Abolishment of Insanity Defense and Validity of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Feb 22, 1992
Idaho Supreme Court Reaffirms Abolishment of Insanity Defense and Validity of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Idaho v. David Leslie...
Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Foreclosure Procedures and Limits on Bad Faith Tort in Commercial Lending

Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Foreclosure Procedures and Limits on Bad Faith Tort in Commercial Lending

Date: Feb 4, 1992
Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Foreclosure Procedures and Limits on Bad Faith Tort in Commercial Lending Introduction In the landmark case of The Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.,...
Affirmation of Robbery and Burglary Convictions and the Acceptable Use of Restraints in State v. Knutson

Affirmation of Robbery and Burglary Convictions and the Acceptable Use of Restraints in State v. Knutson

Date: Feb 1, 1992
Affirmation of Robbery and Burglary Convictions and the Acceptable Use of Restraints in State of Idaho v. Robert Knutson Introduction State of Idaho v. Robert Knutson, 121 Idaho 101 (Court of Appeals...
Inadmissibility of Polygraph Evidence and Limitations on Lesser Included Offenses in Lewd Conduct Cases: Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Aaron Fodge

Inadmissibility of Polygraph Evidence and Limitations on Lesser Included Offenses in Lewd Conduct Cases: Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Aaron Fodge

Date: Jan 17, 1992
Inadmissibility of Polygraph Evidence and Limitations on Lesser Included Offenses in Lewd Conduct Cases: Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Aaron Fodge Introduction STATE of Idaho v. Aaron Fodge, 121...
Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Sentencing: State v. Brown

Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Sentencing: State v. Brown

Date: Jan 11, 1992
Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Sentencing: State of Idaho v. Brown Introduction State of Idaho v. Robert L. Brown is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Idaho in January 1992....
Hernandez v. State of Idaho: Upholding Sentencing Discretion and Statutory Authority in Restitution Orders

Hernandez v. State of Idaho: Upholding Sentencing Discretion and Statutory Authority in Restitution Orders

Date: Dec 11, 1991
Hernandez v. State of Idaho: Upholding Sentencing Discretion and Statutory Authority in Restitution Orders Introduction In the appellate case State of Idaho v. Wenceslao G. Hernandez, the Court of...
Plain View Exception Applied to Sexually Exploitative Materials: State v. Claiborne

Plain View Exception Applied to Sexually Exploitative Materials: State v. Claiborne

Date: Oct 30, 1991
Plain View Exception Applied to Sexually Exploitative Materials: State of Idaho v. Claiborne (120 Idaho 581) Introduction The case of State of Idaho v. Billy Gilbert Claiborne (120 Idaho 581)...
Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Parental Rights Termination

Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Parental Rights Termination

Date: Sep 20, 1991
Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Parental Rights Termination Introduction The case of Norma Aragon Tanner and Merlin Poppe v. State of Idaho, Department of Health...
State v. Broadhead: Upholding Juvenile Sentencing Standards in Idaho

State v. Broadhead: Upholding Juvenile Sentencing Standards in Idaho

Date: Aug 28, 1991
State v. Broadhead: Upholding Juvenile Sentencing Standards in Idaho Introduction State of Idaho v. Jeremy D. Broadhead is a landmark sentencing case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Idaho in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert