Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Idaho Case Commentaries

Mandatory Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. SIVAK

Mandatory Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. SIVAK

Date: Jan 28, 1987
Mandatory Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. SIVAK Introduction STATE v. SIVAK, 112 Idaho 197 (1987), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Recognition of Tortious Bad Faith Actions in Insurance Settlement Practices: An Analysis of Georgeana E. WHITE v. UNIGARD MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

Recognition of Tortious Bad Faith Actions in Insurance Settlement Practices: An Analysis of Georgeana E. WHITE v. UNIGARD MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

Date: Dec 30, 1986
Recognition of Tortious Bad Faith Actions in Insurance Settlement Practices: An Analysis of Georgeana E. WHITE v. UNIGARD MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. Introduction The case of Georgeana E. WHITE v. UNIGARD...
Idaho Supreme Court Sets New Standards for New Trial Motions, Hypnosis Testimony, and Settlement Disclosures in Civil Litigation

Idaho Supreme Court Sets New Standards for New Trial Motions, Hypnosis Testimony, and Settlement Disclosures in Civil Litigation

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Idaho Supreme Court Sets New Standards for New Trial Motions, Hypnosis Testimony, and Settlement Disclosures in Civil Litigation Introduction The case of Lori Quick et al. v. James R. Crane et al....
Idaho Supreme Court Limits Assault and Battery Exception: Government Liability for Negligent Retention of Employees

Idaho Supreme Court Limits Assault and Battery Exception: Government Liability for Negligent Retention of Employees

Date: Apr 24, 1986
Idaho Supreme Court Limits Assault and Battery Exception: Government Liability for Negligent Retention of Employees Introduction In the landmark case of John Doe and Jane Doe v. Lawrence R. Durtschi...
Comprehensive Commentary on Baruth v. Gardner: Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief

Comprehensive Commentary on Baruth v. Gardner: Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Apr 19, 1986
Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief: An Analysis of Baruth v. Gardner Introduction Roger E. Baruth, Petitioner-Appellant, appealed the summary dismissal of his petition for...
Landlord's Consent Insufficient: Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Fourth Amendment Protections in Warrantless Searches

Landlord's Consent Insufficient: Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Fourth Amendment Protections in Warrantless Searches

Date: Mar 13, 1986
Landlord's Consent Insufficient: Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Fourth Amendment Protections in Warrantless Searches Introduction In the landmark case State of Idaho v. John L. Johnson, decided on March...
State of Idaho v. William B. Caudill: Establishing Precedents in Joint Trials and Evidentiary Standards

State of Idaho v. William B. Caudill: Establishing Precedents in Joint Trials and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Mar 16, 1985
State of Idaho v. William B. Caudill: Establishing Precedents in Joint Trials and Evidentiary Standards Introduction In the landmark case of State of Idaho v. William B. Caudill, decided on March 15,...
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Clarification on Option to Purchase Agreements

Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Clarification on Option to Purchase Agreements

Date: Sep 20, 1984
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Clarification on Option to Purchase Agreements Introduction In the landmark case of Or v. Terteling, the Supreme Court of Idaho addressed critical issues surrounding...
Individualized Sentencing and Equal Protection in Lopez v. State of Idaho

Individualized Sentencing and Equal Protection in Lopez v. State of Idaho

Date: May 1, 1984
Individualized Sentencing and Equal Protection in Lopez v. State of Idaho Introduction State of Idaho v. Charles T. Lopez is a pivotal case decided by the Court of Appeals of Idaho on April 30, 1984....
Adoption of Reasonable Care Standard for Landlords: Idaho Supreme Court in Stephens v. Stearns

Adoption of Reasonable Care Standard for Landlords: Idaho Supreme Court in Stephens v. Stearns

Date: Mar 9, 1984
Adoption of Reasonable Care Standard for Landlords: Idaho Supreme Court in Stephens v. Stearns Introduction Case: Mildred G. Stephens, Plaintiff-Appellant, Vs. Thornton B. Stearns and Diane C....
Idaho Supreme Court Overrules COX v. STOLWORTHY: Establishing New Standards for Punitive Damages

Idaho Supreme Court Overrules COX v. STOLWORTHY: Establishing New Standards for Punitive Damages

Date: Jun 16, 1983
Idaho Supreme Court Overrules COX v. STOLWORTHY: Establishing New Standards for Punitive Damages Introduction The case of Kyle Cheney and Georgia Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corporation and...
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Judicial Disqualification in Post-Conviction Proceedings

Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Judicial Disqualification in Post-Conviction Proceedings

Date: Apr 28, 1983
Idaho Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Judicial Disqualification in Post-Conviction Proceedings Introduction The case of The State of Idaho v. Christopher Bearshield addresses critical issues...
Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Trial Court's Discretion on Attorney Fees in Pre-Effective Date I.R.C.P. 54(e) Actions

Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Trial Court's Discretion on Attorney Fees in Pre-Effective Date I.R.C.P. 54(e) Actions

Date: Sep 30, 1982
Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Trial Court's Discretion on Attorney Fees in Pre-Effective Date I.R.C.P. 54(e) Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Herbert Anderson and Darlene Anderson v. Eric...
Affirmation of 'Clear Abuse of Discretion' and Reasonableness Standards in Sentencing: STATE of Idaho v. Phillip Toohill

Affirmation of 'Clear Abuse of Discretion' and Reasonableness Standards in Sentencing: STATE of Idaho v. Phillip Toohill

Date: Sep 9, 1982
Affirmation of 'Clear Abuse of Discretion' and Reasonableness Standards in Sentencing: STATE of Idaho v. Phillip Toohill Introduction The case of STATE of Idaho v. Phillip Toohill, adjudicated by the...
Non-Waiver of Lease Termination Rights Upon Acceptance of Delinquent Rent: Riverside Development Co. v. Ritchie & Farnsworth

Non-Waiver of Lease Termination Rights Upon Acceptance of Delinquent Rent: Riverside Development Co. v. Ritchie & Farnsworth

Date: Sep 1, 1982
Non-Waiver of Lease Termination Rights Upon Acceptance of Delinquent Rent: Riverside Development Company v. Ritchie & Farnsworth Introduction In Riverside Development Company v. Ritchie & Farnsworth,...
Idaho Supreme Court Sets Standards for Antitrust Liability and Class Action Certification in Intermountain Gas Co. Case

Idaho Supreme Court Sets Standards for Antitrust Liability and Class Action Certification in Intermountain Gas Co. Case

Date: Jun 25, 1982
Idaho Supreme Court Sets Standards for Antitrust Liability and Class Action Certification in Intermountain Gas Co. Case Introduction The case of Ron POPE and Lynn Potthast, dba P P Insulation Siding...
Equal Standards for Inadequate and Excessive Damages in Rule 59(a)(5) Motions: Insights from Dinneen v. Finch

Equal Standards for Inadequate and Excessive Damages in Rule 59(a)(5) Motions: Insights from Dinneen v. Finch

Date: Nov 29, 1979
Equal Standards for Inadequate and Excessive Damages in Rule 59(a)(5) Motions: Insights from Dinneen v. Finch Introduction Michael D. Dinneen v. James C. Finch, and City of Wardner is a landmark...
Clarifying 'Reasonable Doubt': Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Freddy Allen Cotton

Clarifying 'Reasonable Doubt': Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Freddy Allen Cotton

Date: Nov 3, 1979
Clarifying 'Reasonable Doubt': Insights from STATE of Idaho v. Freddy Allen Cotton Introduction STATE of Idaho v. Freddy Allen Cotton, 100 Idaho 573 (1979), represents a pivotal case in Idaho...
Probable Cause Standards and Nighttime Search Execution: Insights from Idaho's STATE v. Lindner

Probable Cause Standards and Nighttime Search Execution: Insights from Idaho's STATE v. Lindner

Date: Apr 3, 1979
Probable Cause Standards and Nighttime Search Execution: Insights from Idaho's STATE v. Lindner Introduction The case of STATE of Idaho v. Alan Eugene Lindner, Janis Lynn Seufert, and William Thomas...
Personal and Corporate Liability Under I.C. § 30-110: Insights from Minich v. Gem State Developers

Personal and Corporate Liability Under I.C. § 30-110: Insights from Minich v. Gem State Developers

Date: Feb 17, 1979
Personal and Corporate Liability Under I.C. § 30-110: Insights from Minich v. Gem State Developers 1. Introduction Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert