Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Deference to Trial Counsel’s Strategic Defense Choices and Standards for Affirmative Defense Jury Instructions in Fox v. State

Deference to Trial Counsel’s Strategic Defense Choices and Standards for Affirmative Defense Jury Instructions in Fox v. State

Date: May 7, 2025
Deference to Trial Counsel’s Strategic Defense Choices and Standards for Affirmative Defense Jury Instructions in Fox v. State Introduction Fox v. State, decided May 6, 2025 by the Supreme Court of...
“Denny v. State: Limits on Chain-of-Custody Objections and Counsel Performance Under Strickland”

“Denny v. State: Limits on Chain-of-Custody Objections and Counsel Performance Under Strickland”

Date: May 7, 2025
Denny v. State: Limits on Chain-of-Custody Objections and Counsel Performance Under Strickland Introduction In Denny v. State, decided May 6, 2025, the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed whether...
Intrinsic Evidence Doctrine Clarified: Admissibility of Defendant’s Drug Use Under OCGA §24-4-404(b)

Intrinsic Evidence Doctrine Clarified: Admissibility of Defendant’s Drug Use Under OCGA §24-4-404(b)

Date: May 7, 2025
Intrinsic Evidence Doctrine Clarified: Admissibility of Defendant’s Drug Use Under OCGA §24-4-404(b) Introduction In Coleman v. State, decided May 6, 2025, the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed the...
Accomplice Jury Instruction as Judicial Opinion: Mandatory New Trial Under OCGA § 17-8-57(c)

Accomplice Jury Instruction as Judicial Opinion: Mandatory New Trial Under OCGA § 17-8-57(c)

Date: Apr 9, 2025
Accomplice Jury Instruction as Judicial Opinion: Mandatory New Trial Under OCGA § 17-8-57(c) Introduction State v. Cleveland and State v. Williams were consolidated appeals decided by the Supreme...
Harmless Error Standards for Confrontation Clause Violations in Overwhelming Evidence: Kingdom v. State

Harmless Error Standards for Confrontation Clause Violations in Overwhelming Evidence: Kingdom v. State

Date: Apr 9, 2025
Harmless Error Standards for Confrontation Clause Violations in Overwhelming Evidence Introduction In the case of Kingdom v. State, decided April 8, 2025 by the Supreme Court of Georgia, defendant...
Mandatory Prosecutorial Consent and Broad Discretion in Retroactive First-Offender Treatment: Ballard v. State

Mandatory Prosecutorial Consent and Broad Discretion in Retroactive First-Offender Treatment: Ballard v. State

Date: Apr 9, 2025
Mandatory Prosecutorial Consent and Broad Discretion in Retroactive First-Offender Treatment: Ballard v. State Introduction Ballard v. State, decided April 8, 2025 by the Supreme Court of Georgia,...
Williams v. State: Clarifying the State’s Burden to Disprove Justification and the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Williams v. State: Clarifying the State’s Burden to Disprove Justification and the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Apr 9, 2025
Williams v. State: Clarifying the State’s Burden to Disprove Justification and the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In Williams v. State, the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Jurisdictional Continuity under OCGA § 17-7-50.1: Superior Court Retains Authority Despite Delayed Reindictment

Jurisdictional Continuity under OCGA § 17-7-50.1: Superior Court Retains Authority Despite Delayed Reindictment

Date: Apr 9, 2025
Jurisdictional Continuity under OCGA § 17-7-50.1: Superior Court Retains Authority Despite Delayed Reindictment Introduction Cooper v. State, decided April 8, 2025, by the Supreme Court of Georgia,...
Accomplice Designation as Judicial Commentary on Guilt Violates OCGA §17-8-57 in State v. Cleveland

Accomplice Designation as Judicial Commentary on Guilt Violates OCGA §17-8-57 in State v. Cleveland

Date: Apr 9, 2025
Accomplice Designation as Judicial Commentary on Guilt Violates OCGA §17-8-57 Introduction State v. Cleveland, decided April 8, 2025 by the Supreme Court of Georgia, concerns two...
State v. Brantley (2025): No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Recorded Jail Calls & Rational-Basis Equal Protection

State v. Brantley (2025): No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Recorded Jail Calls & Rational-Basis Equal Protection

Date: Apr 9, 2025
State v. Brantley (2025): No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Recorded Jail Calls & Rational-Basis Equal Protection Introduction In State v. Brantley, 311 Ga. 1 (2025), the Supreme Court of...
No Ineffective Assistance Without Nonfrivolous Appeal or Serious Provocation: Pinckney v. State

No Ineffective Assistance Without Nonfrivolous Appeal or Serious Provocation: Pinckney v. State

Date: Apr 9, 2025
No Ineffective Assistance Without Nonfrivolous Appeal or Serious Provocation: Pinckney v. State Introduction In Pinckney v. State, S25A0267 (Ga. Apr. 8, 2025), the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed...
New Precedent on Blood Test Evidence in DUI Cases: Constitutional Protections and Exclusionary Considerations

New Precedent on Blood Test Evidence in DUI Cases: Constitutional Protections and Exclusionary Considerations

Date: Mar 20, 2025
New Precedent on Blood Test Evidence in DUI Cases: Constitutional Protections and Exclusionary Considerations Introduction The Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in THE STATE v. DIAS establishes...
Implied Consent Reaffirmed: Voluntary Consent and Evidence Admissibility in DUI Cases

Implied Consent Reaffirmed: Voluntary Consent and Evidence Admissibility in DUI Cases

Date: Mar 9, 2025
Implied Consent Reaffirmed: Voluntary Consent and Evidence Admissibility in DUI Cases Introduction The case of La Anyane v. The State brings to the fore a fundamental question regarding the...
Direct Evidence Prevails: Clarifying Accomplice Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence in Felony Cases

Direct Evidence Prevails: Clarifying Accomplice Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence in Felony Cases

Date: Mar 9, 2025
Direct Evidence Prevails: Clarifying Accomplice Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence in Felony Cases Introduction The case of Dillard v. The State before the Supreme Court of Georgia addresses...
New Precedent on Cumulative Evidence and Waiver of Mistrial Rights in Homicide Cases: The Collins v. The State Decision

New Precedent on Cumulative Evidence and Waiver of Mistrial Rights in Homicide Cases: The Collins v. The State Decision

Date: Mar 9, 2025
New Precedent on Cumulative Evidence and Waiver of Mistrial Rights in Homicide Cases: The Collins v. The State Decision Introduction The Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in Collins v. The State...

      Clarifying the Justification Defense in Felon-in-Possession Cases:
      The Need for Tailored Jury Instructions in Hill v. The State

Clarifying the Justification Defense in Felon-in-Possession Cases: The Need for Tailored Jury Instructions in Hill v. The State

Date: Mar 9, 2025
Clarifying the Justification Defense in Felon-in-Possession Cases: The Need for Tailored Jury Instructions in Hill v. The State Introduction The Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in Hill v. The...
Clarifying "Bad Faith" in Claims for Litigation Expenses under OCGA § 13-6-11

Clarifying "Bad Faith" in Claims for Litigation Expenses under OCGA § 13-6-11

Date: Mar 9, 2025
Clarifying "Bad Faith" in Claims for Litigation Expenses under OCGA § 13-6-11 Introduction In the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia in LOVE v. MCKNIGHT, the Court revisited and...
Reaffirming the Relevance of Extrinsic Evidence in Establishing Criminal Intent under OCGA § 16-6-5

Reaffirming the Relevance of Extrinsic Evidence in Establishing Criminal Intent under OCGA § 16-6-5

Date: Mar 9, 2025
Reaffirming the Relevance of Extrinsic Evidence in Establishing Criminal Intent under OCGA § 16-6-5 Introduction The case of THE STATE v. GREEN brought before the Supreme Court of Georgia has...
New Precedent: Affirming Discretion in Investigator Sequestration and Defendant Autonomy in Defense Strategy

New Precedent: Affirming Discretion in Investigator Sequestration and Defendant Autonomy in Defense Strategy

Date: Mar 9, 2025
New Precedent: Affirming Discretion in Investigator Sequestration and Defendant Autonomy in Defense Strategy Introduction In the case of RILEY v. THE STATE, the Supreme Court of Georgia examined...
Defining the Limits of the Habitation Defense in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Defining the Limits of the Habitation Defense in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Mar 9, 2025
Defining the Limits of the Habitation Defense in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction The Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in NESBIT v. THE STATE establishes an important...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert