Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Restriction on Capital Punishment for Kidnapping with Bodily Injury: Insights from PEEK v. THE STATE

Restriction on Capital Punishment for Kidnapping with Bodily Injury: Insights from PEEK v. THE STATE

Date: Sep 7, 1977
Restriction on Capital Punishment for Kidnapping with Bodily Injury: Insights from PEEK v. THE STATE Introduction PEEK v. THE STATE is a pivotal 1977 decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia that...
Howard Schultz Associates v. Broniec: Affirming Restrictions on Non-Compete and Nondisclosure Covenants in Georgia

Howard Schultz Associates v. Broniec: Affirming Restrictions on Non-Compete and Nondisclosure Covenants in Georgia

Date: Jun 9, 1977
Howard Schultz Associates v. Broniec: Affirming Restrictions on Non-Compete and Nondisclosure Covenants in Georgia Introduction The case of Howard Schultz Associates of the Southeast, Inc. v. Broniec...
Hamilton v. The State: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Independent Crimes Evidence

Hamilton v. The State: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Independent Crimes Evidence

Date: May 13, 1977
Hamilton v. The State: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Independent Crimes Evidence Introduction Hamilton v. The State (239 Ga. 72), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on May 12,...
Pryor v. The State: Clarifying the Distinction Between Kidnapping with Bodily Injury and Murder in Double Jeopardy Context

Pryor v. The State: Clarifying the Distinction Between Kidnapping with Bodily Injury and Murder in Double Jeopardy Context

Date: Apr 28, 1977
Pryor v. The State: Clarifying the Distinction Between Kidnapping with Bodily Injury and Murder in Double Jeopardy Context Introduction The case of Pryor v. The State, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Thornton v. The State: Balancing Brady Disclosure and Informer's Privilege in Georgia

Thornton v. The State: Balancing Brady Disclosure and Informer's Privilege in Georgia

Date: Jan 7, 1977
Thornton v. The State: Balancing Brady Disclosure and Informer's Privilege in Georgia Introduction Thornton v. The State, 238 Ga. 160 (1977), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia, addresses...
No Coverage Without Prompt Notice: Insights from Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Insurance Co.

No Coverage Without Prompt Notice: Insights from Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Insurance Co.

Date: Oct 8, 1976
No Coverage Without Prompt Notice: Insights from Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Richmond et al. v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance...
Riley v. The State: Establishing Standards for Waiver of Rights and Admissibility of Juvenile Incriminations

Riley v. The State: Establishing Standards for Waiver of Rights and Admissibility of Juvenile Incriminations

Date: Jun 24, 1976
Riley v. The State: Establishing Standards for Waiver of Rights and Admissibility of Juvenile Incriminations Introduction Riley v. The State (237 Ga. 124), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Affirming the Admissibility and Sufficiency of Conspirator Testimony: Insights from Birt v. The State (236 Ga. 815)

Affirming the Admissibility and Sufficiency of Conspirator Testimony: Insights from Birt v. The State (236 Ga. 815)

Date: Apr 21, 1976
Affirming the Admissibility and Sufficiency of Conspirator Testimony: Insights from Birt v. The State (236 Ga. 815) Introduction Birt v. The State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on April...
Affirmation of Capital Punishment Standards in PULLIAM v. THE STATE

Affirmation of Capital Punishment Standards in PULLIAM v. THE STATE

Date: Feb 25, 1976
Affirmation of Capital Punishment Standards in PULLIAM v. THE STATE Introduction PULLIAM v. THE STATE, 236 Ga. 460 (1976), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia, serves as a pivotal case in the...
Clarification of Appellate Review Standards for Directed Verdicts in Georgia Criminal Cases – BETHAY et al. v. THE STATE

Clarification of Appellate Review Standards for Directed Verdicts in Georgia Criminal Cases – BETHAY et al. v. THE STATE

Date: Oct 22, 1975
Clarification of Appellate Review Standards for Directed Verdicts in Georgia Criminal Cases Introduction BETHAY et al. v. THE STATE, 235 Ga. 371 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975), serves as a pivotal...
Comprehensive Commentary on JARRELL v. THE STATE (234 Ga. 410)

Comprehensive Commentary on JARRELL v. THE STATE (234 Ga. 410)

Date: Apr 30, 1975
Guidelines for Joinder of Capital and Non-Capital Offenses: A Comprehensive Analysis of JARRELL v. THE STATE (234 Ga. 410) Introduction JARRELL v. THE STATE is a landmark decision rendered by the...
Chenault v. The State: Affirmation of Death Sentences and Standards for Insanity Defense

Chenault v. The State: Affirmation of Death Sentences and Standards for Insanity Defense

Date: Apr 10, 1975
Chenault v. The State: Affirmation of Death Sentences and Standards for Insanity Defense Introduction Chenault v. The State, 234 Ga. 216 (1975), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Moore v. The State (1975): Upholding Georgia's Death Penalty Regulations

Moore v. The State (1975): Upholding Georgia's Death Penalty Regulations

Date: Feb 13, 1975
Moore v. The State (1975): Upholding Georgia's Death Penalty Regulations Introduction Moore v. The State is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on February 12, 1975. The...
Patterson v. The State: Affirmation of Conviction Amidst Alibi Instruction Controversy

Patterson v. The State: Affirmation of Conviction Amidst Alibi Instruction Controversy

Date: Feb 6, 1975
Patterson v. The State: Affirmation of Conviction Amidst Alibi Instruction Controversy Introduction The case of Patterson v. The State, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on February 5,...
Clarifying Identification Procedures and Jury Selection Standards in PAYNE v. THE STATE

Clarifying Identification Procedures and Jury Selection Standards in PAYNE v. THE STATE

Date: Nov 19, 1974
Clarifying Identification Procedures and Jury Selection Standards in PAYNE v. THE STATE Introduction PAYNE v. THE STATE is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on November 18, 1974....
Reaffirming Remaindermen Rights in the Presence of Lost Deeds: Harper v. Paradise

Reaffirming Remaindermen Rights in the Presence of Lost Deeds: Harper v. Paradise

Date: Nov 6, 1974
Reaffirming Remaindermen Rights in the Presence of Lost Deeds: Harper v. Paradise Introduction Harper et al. v. Paradise et al. (233 Ga. 194), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on November...
Capital Punishment Standards and Multiple Sentencing in Gregg v. The State

Capital Punishment Standards and Multiple Sentencing in Gregg v. The State

Date: Oct 18, 1974
Capital Punishment Standards and Multiple Sentencing in Gregg v. The State Introduction Gregg v. The State, 233 Ga. 117 (1974), is a pivotal judgment by the Supreme Court of Georgia that addresses...
Limits of Brady Disclosure and Sentencing Procedures in HICKS v. THE STATE (232 Ga. 393)

Limits of Brady Disclosure and Sentencing Procedures in HICKS v. THE STATE (232 Ga. 393)

Date: Jun 19, 1974
Limits of Brady Disclosure and Sentencing Procedures in HICKS v. THE STATE (232 Ga. 393) Introduction HICKS v. THE STATE (232 Ga. 393), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on June 18, 1974,...
Double Jeopardy under the 1968 Georgia Criminal Code: The State v. Estevez

Double Jeopardy under the 1968 Georgia Criminal Code: The State v. Estevez

Date: May 29, 1974
Double Jeopardy under the 1968 Georgia Criminal Code: The State v. Estevez Introduction The State v. Estevez is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on May 28, 1974. The case...
Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Stevens: Defining the Boundaries Between Contract Breach and Tort Liability

Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Stevens: Defining the Boundaries Between Contract Breach and Tort Liability

Date: Nov 8, 1973
Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Stevens: Defining the Boundaries Between Contract Breach and Tort Liability Introduction Orkin Exterminating Company Inc. v. Stevens, 130 Ga. App. 363, decided on November...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert