Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Mandatory Written Acceptance of Optional Coverages in No-Fault Insurance: Insights from Jones v. State Farm

Mandatory Written Acceptance of Optional Coverages in No-Fault Insurance: Insights from Jones v. State Farm

Date: Oct 23, 1980
Mandatory Written Acceptance of Optional Coverages in No-Fault Insurance: Insights from Jones v. State Farm Introduction The case of Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,...
Timberlake v. The State: Affirming Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence and Hearsay Exceptions

Timberlake v. The State: Affirming Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence and Hearsay Exceptions

Date: Sep 24, 1980
Timberlake v. The State: Affirming Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence and Hearsay Exceptions Introduction Timberlake v. The State is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Resetting the Appeal Period Due to Insufficient Notice: An Analysis of CAMBRON v. Canal Insurance Company

Resetting the Appeal Period Due to Insufficient Notice: An Analysis of CAMBRON v. Canal Insurance Company

Date: Jun 28, 1980
Resetting the Appeal Period Due to Insufficient Notice: An Analysis of CAMBRON et al. v. Canal Insurance Company Introduction CAMBRON et al. v. Canal Insurance Company is a landmark case decided by...
HANCE v. THE STATE: Establishing Standards for Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Murder Cases

HANCE v. THE STATE: Establishing Standards for Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Murder Cases

Date: Jun 25, 1980
HANCE v. THE STATE: Establishing Standards for Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Murder Cases Introduction HANCE v. THE STATE is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on June 24,...
Establishing Sovereign Immunity for School Principals in Negligence Claims: An Analysis of Hennessy v. Webb et al. (1980)

Establishing Sovereign Immunity for School Principals in Negligence Claims: An Analysis of Hennessy v. Webb et al. (1980)

Date: Feb 28, 1980
Establishing Sovereign Immunity for School Principals in Negligence Claims: An Analysis of Hennessy v. Webb et al. (1980) Introduction Hennessy v. Webb et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Presumption of Sanity Reinforced in MOSES v. THE STATE

Presumption of Sanity Reinforced in MOSES v. THE STATE

Date: Feb 6, 1980
Presumption of Sanity Reinforced in MOSES v. THE STATE Introduction Case: MOSES v. THE STATE Court: Supreme Court of Georgia Date: February 5, 1980 The case of Moses v. The State involves George...
Crawford v. The State: Affirming the Limits of Involuntary Manslaughter Charges in Self-Defense Cases Involving Firearms

Crawford v. The State: Affirming the Limits of Involuntary Manslaughter Charges in Self-Defense Cases Involving Firearms

Date: Jan 5, 1980
Crawford v. The State: Affirming the Limits of Involuntary Manslaughter Charges in Self-Defense Cases Involving Firearms Introduction Crawford v. The State (245 Ga. 89), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Felony-Murder Rule Clarified in Collier v. The State

Felony-Murder Rule Clarified in Collier v. The State

Date: Oct 31, 1979
Felony-Murder Rule Clarified in Collier v. The State (244 Ga. 553) Introduction Collier v. The State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on October 30, 1979, represents a pivotal case in the...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Multiple Aggravating Circumstances and the Admissibility of Videotaped Confessions in GATES v. THE STATE

Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Multiple Aggravating Circumstances and the Admissibility of Videotaped Confessions in GATES v. THE STATE

Date: Oct 25, 1979
Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Multiple Aggravating Circumstances and the Admissibility of Videotaped Confessions in GATES v. THE STATE Introduction Case: GATES v. THE STATE. Court: Supreme...
Reinforcing the Presumption of Scope of Employment in Respondeat Superior: Allen Kane's Major Dodge, Inc. v. Barnes

Reinforcing the Presumption of Scope of Employment in Respondeat Superior: Allen Kane's Major Dodge, Inc. v. Barnes

Date: May 31, 1979
Reinforcing the Presumption of Scope of Employment in Respondeat Superior: Allen Kane's Major Dodge, Inc. v. Barnes Introduction The case of Allen Kane's Major Dodge, Inc. v. Barnes ([243 Ga....
Affirmation of Permissible Warrantless Inventory Search and Co-Conspirator Testimony in Mooney v. The State

Affirmation of Permissible Warrantless Inventory Search and Co-Conspirator Testimony in Mooney v. The State

Date: Mar 16, 1979
Affirmation of Permissible Warrantless Inventory Search and Co-Conspirator Testimony in Mooney v. The State Introduction Mooney v. The State is a landmark decision delivered by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirmation of Employment at Will and Corporate Liability in Busbin v. Georgia Power Company

Reaffirmation of Employment at Will and Corporate Liability in Busbin v. Georgia Power Company

Date: Nov 8, 1978
Reaffirmation of Employment at Will and Corporate Liability in Busbin v. Georgia Power Company Introduction The case of Georgia Power Company et al. v. Busbin, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Joint Criminal Liability and the Upholding of the Death Penalty in Johnson v. The State

Joint Criminal Liability and the Upholding of the Death Penalty in Johnson v. The State

Date: Oct 18, 1978
Joint Criminal Liability and the Upholding of the Death Penalty in Johnson v. The State Introduction Johnson v. The State, 242 Ga. 649 (1978), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Potts v. The State: Clarifying Double Jeopardy and Capital Sentencing in Intercounty Crimes

Potts v. The State: Clarifying Double Jeopardy and Capital Sentencing in Intercounty Crimes

Date: Mar 17, 1978
Potts v. The State: Clarifying Double Jeopardy and Capital Sentencing in Intercounty Crimes Introduction Potts v. The State is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia, rendered on March...
Pierce v. Pierce: Upholding Child Support Based on Earning Capacity

Pierce v. Pierce: Upholding Child Support Based on Earning Capacity

Date: Mar 2, 1978
Pierce v. Pierce: Upholding Child Support Based on Earning Capacity Introduction Pierce v. Pierce, 241 Ga. 96, is a significant judgment by the Supreme Court of Georgia decided on March 1, 1978. The...
Affirmation of Death Penalty under Multiple Aggravating Circumstances in Moore v. The State

Affirmation of Death Penalty under Multiple Aggravating Circumstances in Moore v. The State

Date: Feb 8, 1978
Affirmation of Death Penalty under Multiple Aggravating Circumstances in Moore v. The State Introduction Moore v. The State is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia, adjudicated on...
Hawes v. The State: Reinforcing the Consideration of Mitigating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing

Hawes v. The State: Reinforcing the Consideration of Mitigating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing

Date: Nov 29, 1977
Hawes v. The State: Reinforcing the Consideration of Mitigating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing Introduction Hawes v. The State is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Impact of Jury Instruction Standards in Capital Sentencing: Fleming v. The State

Impact of Jury Instruction Standards in Capital Sentencing: Fleming v. The State

Date: Nov 9, 1977
Impact of Jury Instruction Standards in Capital Sentencing: Fleming v. The State Introduction Fleming v. The State, 240 Ga. 142 (1977), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia....
CHAMBERS v. STATE: Establishing the Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence Through Stipulation

CHAMBERS v. STATE: Establishing the Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence Through Stipulation

Date: Oct 19, 1977
CHAMBERS v. STATE: Establishing the Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence Through Stipulation Introduction CHAMBERS v. STATE, decided on October 18, 1977, by the Supreme Court of Georgia, marks a...
EUBANKS v. STATE: Establishing Harmless Error Standard for Indictment Imperfections in Georgia

EUBANKS v. STATE: Establishing Harmless Error Standard for Indictment Imperfections in Georgia

Date: Sep 8, 1977
EUBANKS v. STATE: Establishing Harmless Error Standard for Indictment Imperfections in Georgia Introduction In the landmark case of The State v. Eubanks, 239 Ga. 483 (1977), the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert