Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Juror Sequestration Integrity Standards in Whitlock v. The State

Reaffirming Juror Sequestration Integrity Standards in Whitlock v. The State

Date: Jun 22, 1973
Reaffirming Juror Sequestration Integrity Standards in Whitlock v. The State Introduction The case of Whitlock v. The State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on June 21, 1973, addresses...
Amendment of Pleadings Post-Summary Judgment Reversal: Insights from Summer-Minter Associates, Inc. v. Giordano

Amendment of Pleadings Post-Summary Judgment Reversal: Insights from Summer-Minter Associates, Inc. v. Giordano

Date: Jan 29, 1973
Amendment of Pleadings Post-Summary Judgment Reversal: Insights from Summer-Minter Associates, Inc. v. Giordano Introduction The case of Summer-Minter Associates, Inc. et al. v. Giordano et al.,...
Standards for Evaluating Harmless Error and Admissible Evidence in Appellate Review: MALOY et al. v. DIXON

Standards for Evaluating Harmless Error and Admissible Evidence in Appellate Review: MALOY et al. v. DIXON

Date: Sep 7, 1972
Standards for Evaluating Harmless Error and Admissible Evidence in Appellate Review: MALOY et al. v. DIXON Introduction MALOY et al. v. DIXON is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Court of Appeals of...
Exoneration through Newly Discovered Evidence: Bell v. The State

Exoneration through Newly Discovered Evidence: Bell v. The State

Date: Jul 10, 1971
Exoneration through Newly Discovered Evidence: Bell v. The State Introduction Bell v. The State (227 Ga. 800) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July 9, 1971. The case...
Insufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery Conviction: De PALMA v. The State

Insufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery Conviction: De PALMA v. The State

Date: Sep 9, 1969
Insufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery Conviction: De PALMA v. The State Introduction De PALMA v. The State, 225 Ga. 465 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969), is a pivotal case that examines...
Elimination of Duplicity as a Special Demurrer and Its Implications: HILL v. WILLIS et al. (224 Ga. 263)

Elimination of Duplicity as a Special Demurrer and Its Implications: HILL v. WILLIS et al. (224 Ga. 263)

Date: Apr 5, 1968
Elimination of Duplicity as a Special Demurrer and Its Implications: HILL v. WILLIS et al. (224 Ga. 263) Introduction Hill v. Willis et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Insufficient Color of Title Fails to Establish Adverse Possession: Herrington v. The Church of the Lord Jesus Christ et al.

Insufficient Color of Title Fails to Establish Adverse Possession: Herrington v. The Church of the Lord Jesus Christ et al.

Date: Sep 20, 1966
Insufficient Color of Title Fails to Establish Adverse Possession: Herrington v. The Church of the Lord Jesus Christ et al. Introduction The case of Herrington v. The Church of the Lord Jesus Christ...
Hoard v. Wiley: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Opinion Evidence on Property Value

Hoard v. Wiley: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Opinion Evidence on Property Value

Date: Mar 18, 1966
Hoard v. Wiley: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Opinion Evidence on Property Value Introduction In the landmark case of Hoard et al. v. Wiley, 113 Ga. App. 328 (1966), the Court of...
Bowers v. Fulton County: Expanding Eminent Domain Compensation to Include Business Damages and Removal Expenses

Bowers v. Fulton County: Expanding Eminent Domain Compensation to Include Business Damages and Removal Expenses

Date: Jan 8, 1966
Bowers v. Fulton County: Expanding Eminent Domain Compensation to Include Business Damages and Removal Expenses Introduction Bowers v. Fulton County, 221 Ga. 731 (1966), is a landmark decision by the...
Establishing Standards for Summary Judgment with Circumstantial Evidence: McCARTY v. National Life Accident Insurance Company

Establishing Standards for Summary Judgment with Circumstantial Evidence: McCARTY v. National Life Accident Insurance Company

Date: Dec 4, 1962
Establishing Standards for Summary Judgment with Circumstantial Evidence: McCARTY v. National Life Accident Insurance Company Introduction McCARTY v. National Life Accident Insurance Company is a...
Admissibility of Confessions and Proper Jury Management: Insights from SMITH v. THE STATE

Admissibility of Confessions and Proper Jury Management: Insights from SMITH v. THE STATE

Date: Jul 10, 1962
Admissibility of Confessions and Proper Jury Management: Insights from SMITH v. THE STATE, 218 Ga. 216 (1962) Introduction SMITH v. THE STATE, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July 9,...
Reaffirming the Standards for Summary Judgment and Intentional Torts in Georgia: Insights from Holland v. Sanfax Corporation

Reaffirming the Standards for Summary Judgment and Intentional Torts in Georgia: Insights from Holland v. Sanfax Corporation

Date: May 10, 1962
Reaffirming the Standards for Summary Judgment and Intentional Torts in Georgia: Insights from Holland v. Sanfax Corporation Introduction Holland v. Sanfax Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Joyner v. The State: Establishing Standards for Jury Instructions on Malice and Mutual Combat in Murder Convictions

Joyner v. The State: Establishing Standards for Jury Instructions on Malice and Mutual Combat in Murder Convictions

Date: Oct 11, 1951
Joyner v. The State: Establishing Standards for Jury Instructions on Malice and Mutual Combat in Murder Convictions Introduction In the landmark case of Joyner v. The State (208 Ga. 435), decided by...
Presumption of Estate for Years in Georgia Leases: Warehouses Inc. v. Wetherbee (1948)

Presumption of Estate for Years in Georgia Leases: Warehouses Inc. v. Wetherbee (1948)

Date: Mar 20, 1948
Presumption of Estate for Years in Georgia Leases: Warehouses Inc. v. Wetherbee (1948) Introduction The case of Warehouses Inc. v. Wetherbee et al. (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948) addresses a...
Williams v. Grier: Establishing Foreseeability in Negligence and Proximate Cause

Williams v. Grier: Establishing Foreseeability in Negligence and Proximate Cause

Date: Jul 9, 1943
Williams v. Grier: Establishing Foreseeability in Negligence and Proximate Cause Introduction Williams v. Grier et al. is a pivotal 1943 decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia that delves into the...
Insufficient Property Description in Deeds: The Precedent Set by GOULD v. GOULD (1942)

Insufficient Property Description in Deeds: The Precedent Set by GOULD v. GOULD (1942)

Date: Jun 17, 1942
Insufficient Property Description in Deeds: The Precedent Set by Gould v. Gould (1942) Introduction Gould v. Gould is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia, delivered on June 16, 1942....
Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co.: Establishing the Legal Right to Privacy

Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co.: Establishing the Legal Right to Privacy

Date: Mar 4, 1905
Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co.: Establishing the Legal Right to Privacy Introduction The landmark case of Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert