Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

From “Liberal Thrust” to Rigorous Gate-Keeping: Delaware Supreme Court Aligns D.R.E. 702 with Federal Rule 702 and Mandates Product-Specific Causation — Commentary on In re Zantac (Ranitidine) Litigation

From “Liberal Thrust” to Rigorous Gate-Keeping: Delaware Supreme Court Aligns D.R.E. 702 with Federal Rule 702 and Mandates Product-Specific Causation — Commentary on In re Zantac (Ranitidine) Litigation

Date: Jul 11, 2025
From “Liberal Thrust” to Rigorous Gate-Keeping: Delaware Supreme Court Aligns D.R.E. 702 with Federal Rule 702 and Mandates Product-Specific Causation — Commentary on In re Zantac (Ranitidine)...
Finality over Formality: Barlow v. State and the Discretion to Deny Plea Withdrawal Without an Evidentiary Hearing

Finality over Formality: Barlow v. State and the Discretion to Deny Plea Withdrawal Without an Evidentiary Hearing

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Finality over Formality: Barlow v. State and the Discretion to Deny Plea Withdrawal Without an Evidentiary Hearing Introduction Barlow v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of Delaware on 8 July...
Washington v. State: Temporal-Proximity Sufficiency & the Narrow Scope of Corpus Delicti in Delaware Concealed-Firearm Prosecutions

Washington v. State: Temporal-Proximity Sufficiency & the Narrow Scope of Corpus Delicti in Delaware Concealed-Firearm Prosecutions

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Washington v. State: Temporal-Proximity Sufficiency & the Narrow Scope of Corpus Delicti in Delaware Concealed-Firearm Prosecutions Introduction On 2 July 2025 the Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed...
“More-Than-Enough” Predicate Felonies: Fulton v. State and the Narrow Path to Extraordinary Circumstances under Delaware Rule 35

“More-Than-Enough” Predicate Felonies: Fulton v. State and the Narrow Path to Extraordinary Circumstances under Delaware Rule 35

Date: Jul 4, 2025
“More-Than-Enough” Predicate Felonies: Fulton v. State and the Narrow Path to Extraordinary Circumstances under Delaware Rule 35 Introduction Fulton v. State, No. 123, 2025, decided by the Supreme...
Statutory Cross-Reference Prevails: How Rembert v. State Clarifies the Violent-Felony Predicate Rule After Subsection Renumbering

Statutory Cross-Reference Prevails: How Rembert v. State Clarifies the Violent-Felony Predicate Rule After Subsection Renumbering

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Statutory Cross-Reference Prevails: How Rembert v. State Clarifies the Violent-Felony Predicate Rule After Subsection Renumbering 1. Introduction The Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Rembert v....
“Affirmative Acceptance Equals Waiver” – Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Counsel-Induced Waiver and Remedies for Discovery Violations in Dillard v. State

“Affirmative Acceptance Equals Waiver” – Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Counsel-Induced Waiver and Remedies for Discovery Violations in Dillard v. State

Date: Jul 4, 2025
“Affirmative Acceptance Equals Waiver” – Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Counsel-Induced Waiver and Remedies for Discovery Violations in Dillard v. State Introduction In Dillard v. State (Del. Supr....
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the “Closed-Mind” Standard in Sentencing: Moral Condemnation Does Not Equal Judicial Bias – Commentary on Gingerich v. State (2025)

Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the “Closed-Mind” Standard in Sentencing: Moral Condemnation Does Not Equal Judicial Bias – Commentary on Gingerich v. State (2025)

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the “Closed-Mind” Standard in Sentencing: Moral Condemnation Does Not Equal Judicial Bias – Commentary on Gingerich v. State (2025) Introduction Gingerich v. State,...

    When Silence Is Not Enough: Delaware Supreme Court Narrows the
    “Inherently Unknowable Injury” Tolling Doctrine in Escheated-Securities
    Cases – Saunders v. Lightwave Logic, Inc. (2025)

When Silence Is Not Enough: Delaware Supreme Court Narrows the “Inherently Unknowable Injury” Tolling Doctrine in Escheated-Securities Cases – Saunders v. Lightwave Logic, Inc. (2025)

Date: Jul 4, 2025
When Silence Is Not Enough: Delaware Supreme Court Narrows the “Inherently Unknowable Injury” Tolling Doctrine in Escheated-Securities Cases – Saunders v. Lightwave Logic, Inc. (2025) Introduction...
Davis v. State: Delaware Clarifies “Reasonable Means” Under D.R.E. 804(a)(5) and Re-Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing

Davis v. State: Delaware Clarifies “Reasonable Means” Under D.R.E. 804(a)(5) and Re-Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Davis v. State: Delaware Clarifies “Reasonable Means” Under D.R.E. 804(a)(5) and Re-Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing 1. Introduction In Davis v. State, No. 223, 2024 (Del. June 26, 2025), the...
Expanding the “Position of Trust”: Pearson v. State Affirms Volunteer Fire-Service Officers as Authorities under 11 Del. C. § 761(e)(2)

Expanding the “Position of Trust”: Pearson v. State Affirms Volunteer Fire-Service Officers as Authorities under 11 Del. C. § 761(e)(2)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Expanding the “Position of Trust”: Pearson v. State Affirms Volunteer Fire-Service Officers as Authorities under 11 Del. C. § 761(e)(2) Introduction Pearson v. State, No. 268, 2024 (Del. June 24,...
“The Jones Jurisdiction Principle” – Delaware Clarifies That Indictment Amendments and Element-Omissions in a Plea Colloquy Are Not Jurisdictional Defects

“The Jones Jurisdiction Principle” – Delaware Clarifies That Indictment Amendments and Element-Omissions in a Plea Colloquy Are Not Jurisdictional Defects

Date: Jun 24, 2025
“The Jones Jurisdiction Principle” – Delaware Clarifies That Indictment Amendments and Element-Omissions in a Plea Colloquy Are Not Jurisdictional Defects Introduction Jones v. State, No. 108, 2025...
Scottoline v. Women First, LLC: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the Distinction Between Diagnosis and Etiology Under Rule 702

Scottoline v. Women First, LLC: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the Distinction Between Diagnosis and Etiology Under Rule 702

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Scottoline v. Women First, LLC: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the Distinction Between Diagnosis and Etiology Under Rule 702 Supreme Court of Delaware  |  Decided 18 June 2025  |  No. 48, 2024 1....
“Actual-Knowledge” Becomes the Touchstone: Delaware Clarifies Aider-and-Abettor Liability for Acquirers – Commentary on In re Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. Merger Litigation (Del. Supr. 2025)

“Actual-Knowledge” Becomes the Touchstone: Delaware Clarifies Aider-and-Abettor Liability for Acquirers – Commentary on In re Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. Merger Litigation (Del. Supr. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Actual-Knowledge” Becomes the Touchstone: Delaware Clarifies Aider-and-Abettor Liability for Acquirers Commentary on In re Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. Merger Litigation, 332 A.3d 349 (Del. Supr....
Clarifying the Dual Strickland-Scarborough Standard: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in Lolley v. State (2025)

Clarifying the Dual Strickland-Scarborough Standard: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in Lolley v. State (2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Clarifying the Dual Strickland-Scarborough Standard: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in Lolley v. State (2025) 1. Introduction Lolley v. State is a 2025 ruling of the Delaware Supreme Court...
Mitchell v. Division of Family Services: Waiver of Custody Challenges and the Expedited Termination of Parental Rights after Prior Involuntary TPRs

Mitchell v. Division of Family Services: Waiver of Custody Challenges and the Expedited Termination of Parental Rights after Prior Involuntary TPRs

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Mitchell v. Division of Family Services Waiver of Custody Challenges and the Expedited Termination of Parental Rights after Prior Involuntary TPRs Introduction In Mitchell v. Division of Family...
“Participant” Re-Defined: Delaware Supreme Court Recasts Ambiguity Analysis for Integrated Equity Incentive Agreements

“Participant” Re-Defined: Delaware Supreme Court Recasts Ambiguity Analysis for Integrated Equity Incentive Agreements

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Participant” Re-Defined: Delaware Supreme Court Recasts Ambiguity Analysis for Integrated Equity Incentive Agreements 1. Introduction Village Practice Management Company, LLC (“Village”) granted...
The Expanded Reach of Rule 60(b)(3) in Delaware:  “Erste Asset Management v. Hees” and the Rejection of a Fraud-on-the-Court Limitation

The Expanded Reach of Rule 60(b)(3) in Delaware: “Erste Asset Management v. Hees” and the Rejection of a Fraud-on-the-Court Limitation

Date: Jun 11, 2025
The Expanded Reach of Rule 60(b)(3) in Delaware: “Erste Asset Management v. Hees” and the Rejection of a Fraud-on-the-Court Limitation 1. Introduction In Erste Asset Management GMBH v. Hees, the...
Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability

Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability Introduction Barnes v. Hooper and Harrington Raceway, Inc. d/b/a Harrington Raceway & Casino is a landmark...
Larson v. Gibson: Clarifying “Abuse” Under Delaware PFA to Include Pursuit-Induced Panic and Sexual Coercion

Larson v. Gibson: Clarifying “Abuse” Under Delaware PFA to Include Pursuit-Induced Panic and Sexual Coercion

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Larson v. Gibson: Clarifying “Abuse” Under Delaware PFA to Include Pursuit-Induced Panic and Sexual Coercion Introduction In Larson v. Gibson, No. 344, 2024 (Del. June 2, 2025), the Supreme Court of...
Spinoff Carve-Out for Equity Award Amendments and Demand Futility Clarified by Delaware Supreme Court

Spinoff Carve-Out for Equity Award Amendments and Demand Futility Clarified by Delaware Supreme Court

Date: May 29, 2025
Spinoff Carve-Out for Equity Award Amendments and Demand Futility Clarified by Delaware Supreme Court Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Delaware’s decision in Vladimir...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.