Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Establishing Child's Best Interests: Termination of Parental Rights in Foster Care - In re Jasmon O.

Establishing Child's Best Interests: Termination of Parental Rights in Foster Care - In re Jasmon O.

Date: Sep 3, 1994
Establishing Child's Best Interests: Termination of Parental Rights in Foster Care - In re Jasmon O. Introduction In re Jasmon O. is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of California, dated...
California Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Presidential Proclamations to Entitle Community College Employees to Paid Holidays

California Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Presidential Proclamations to Entitle Community College Employees to Paid Holidays

Date: Sep 3, 1994
California Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Presidential Proclamations to Entitle Community College Employees to Paid Holidays Introduction In the landmark case of California School...
Establishing Reasonableness in Condominium Use Restrictions: Insights from Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village

Establishing Reasonableness in Condominium Use Restrictions: Insights from Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village

Date: Sep 3, 1994
Establishing Reasonableness in Condominium Use Restrictions: Insights from Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Introduction Natore A. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Association, Inc. (8 Cal.4th...
Proposition 103 and Insurance Rate Regulation: A Comprehensive Analysis of 20th Century Insurance Co. v. Garamendi

Proposition 103 and Insurance Rate Regulation: A Comprehensive Analysis of 20th Century Insurance Co. v. Garamendi

Date: Aug 19, 1994
Proposition 103 and Insurance Rate Regulation: A Comprehensive Analysis of 20th Century Insurance Co. v. Garamendi Introduction The case of 20th Century Insurance Company et al. v. Garamendi was...
Affirmation of Proper Application of Peremptory Challenges and Non-Discrimination in Jury Selection: PEOPLE v. TURNER

Affirmation of Proper Application of Peremptory Challenges and Non-Discrimination in Jury Selection: PEOPLE v. TURNER

Date: Aug 16, 1994
Affirmation of Proper Application of Peremptory Challenges and Non-Discrimination in Jury Selection: PEOPLE v. TURNER, 8 Cal.4th 137 (1994) Introduction In the landmark case of PEOPLE v. TURNER, the...
Clarifying the 'Benefit from Continuing the Relationship' Exception under Welfare and Institutions Code §366.26(c)(1)(A): In re Autumn H.

Clarifying the 'Benefit from Continuing the Relationship' Exception under Welfare and Institutions Code §366.26(c)(1)(A): In re Autumn H.

Date: Aug 9, 1994
Clarifying the 'Benefit from Continuing the Relationship' Exception under Welfare and Institutions Code §366.26(c)(1)(A): In re Autumn H. Introduction In re Autumn H. is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Limited Common Law Remedies for Age Discrimination: Insights from JANET JENNINGS v. JAMES J. MARRALLE et al.

Limited Common Law Remedies for Age Discrimination: Insights from JANET JENNINGS v. JAMES J. MARRALLE et al.

Date: Aug 2, 1994
Limited Common Law Remedies for Age Discrimination: Insights from Janet Jennings v. James J. Marralle et al. Introduction The case of Janet Jennings v. James J. Marralle et al., adjudicated by the...
Reduced Privacy Expectations for Juvenile Probationers: Insights from In re TYRELL J.

Reduced Privacy Expectations for Juvenile Probationers: Insights from In re TYRELL J.

Date: Jul 29, 1994
Reduced Privacy Expectations for Juvenile Probationers: Insights from In re TYRELL J. Introduction The California Supreme Court's decision in In re TYRELL J. (1994) marks a significant development in...
Limitation of Noneconomic Damages in Equitable Indemnification under MICRA: Western Steamship Lines v. San Pedro Peninsula Hospital

Limitation of Noneconomic Damages in Equitable Indemnification under MICRA: Western Steamship Lines v. San Pedro Peninsula Hospital

Date: Jul 29, 1994
Limitation of Noneconomic Damages in Equitable Indemnification under MICRA: Western Steamship Lines v. San Pedro Peninsula Hospital Introduction The case of Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro...
Constructive Wrongful Discharge Criteria Established in Turner v. Anheuser-Busch

Constructive Wrongful Discharge Criteria Established in Turner v. Anheuser-Busch

Date: Jul 26, 1994
Constructive Wrongful Discharge Criteria Established in Turner v. Anheuser-Busch Introduction In the landmark case James M. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Comprehensive Commentary on R.R. Hensler v. City of Glendale: Establishing the Applicability of Government Code Section 66499.37 in Inverse Condemnation Actions

Comprehensive Commentary on R.R. Hensler v. City of Glendale: Establishing the Applicability of Government Code Section 66499.37 in Inverse Condemnation Actions

Date: Jul 26, 1994
Establishing the Applicability of Government Code Section 66499.37 in Inverse Condemnation Actions: A Comprehensive Commentary on R.R. Hensler v. City of Glendale Introduction R.R. Hensler v. City of...
Affirming Department's Authority to Require Supplementary Information under CEQA

Affirming Department's Authority to Require Supplementary Information under CEQA

Date: Jul 22, 1994
Affirming Department's Authority to Require Supplementary Information under CEQA: Sierra Club et al. v. State Board of Forestry et al. Introduction The case of Sierra Club et al. v. State Board of...
Burden of Proof in Defamation Under Common-Interest Privilege: Lundquist v. Reusser

Burden of Proof in Defamation Under Common-Interest Privilege: Lundquist v. Reusser

Date: Jul 22, 1994
Burden of Proof in Defamation Under Common-Interest Privilege: Lundquist v. Reusser Introduction In the Supreme Court of California case Vivienne Lundquist v. Heinz Reusser et al. (7 Cal.4th 1193,...
Affirming Wrongful Discharge Claims for In-House Attorneys: Establishing New Legal Precedents

Affirming Wrongful Discharge Claims for In-House Attorneys: Establishing New Legal Precedents

Date: Jul 19, 1994
Affirming Wrongful Discharge Claims for In-House Attorneys: Establishing New Legal Precedents Introduction The judicial landscape underwent a significant transformation with the landmark decision in...
Admissibility of Preliminary Hearing Transcripts in Probation Revocation Hearings: Insights from People v. Arreola

Admissibility of Preliminary Hearing Transcripts in Probation Revocation Hearings: Insights from People v. Arreola

Date: Jul 15, 1994
Admissibility of Preliminary Hearing Transcripts in Probation Revocation Hearings: Insights from People v. Arreola Introduction People v. Alfonso Sergio Arreola (7 Cal.4th 1144, 1994) is a landmark...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in THE PEOPLE v. KEITH TYRONE FUDGE: Jurisprudential Implications and Procedural Considerations

Affirmation of Death Penalty in THE PEOPLE v. KEITH TYRONE FUDGE: Jurisprudential Implications and Procedural Considerations

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Affirmation of Death Penalty in THE PEOPLE v. KEITH TYRONE FUDGE: Jurisprudential Implications and Procedural Considerations Introduction The People v. Keith Tyrone Fudge is a landmark decision by...
State Regulation of Tobacco Advertising: Affirming States' Police Powers in Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

State Regulation of Tobacco Advertising: Affirming States' Police Powers in Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

Date: Jul 1, 1994
State Regulation of Tobacco Advertising: Affirming States' Police Powers in Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Introduction In the landmark case JANET C. MANGINI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v....
People v. Montoya: Defining the Temporal Scope of Aiding and Abetting in Burglary Cases

People v. Montoya: Defining the Temporal Scope of Aiding and Abetting in Burglary Cases

Date: Jun 28, 1994
People v. Montoya: Defining the Temporal Scope of Aiding and Abetting in Burglary Cases Introduction People v. Rosario Montoya is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California rendered on...
Establishing Standards for Cocounsel Status and Self-Representation in Capital Punishment Trials: Insights from People v. Kirkpatrick

Establishing Standards for Cocounsel Status and Self-Representation in Capital Punishment Trials: Insights from People v. Kirkpatrick

Date: Jun 14, 1994
Establishing Standards for Cocounsel Status and Self-Representation in Capital Punishment Trials: Insights from People v. Kirkpatrick Introduction People v. Kirkpatrick (7 Cal.4th 988, 1994) is a...
Balancing Informant Privilege and Defendant's Rights in Search Warrant Affidavits

Balancing Informant Privilege and Defendant's Rights in Search Warrant Affidavits

Date: Jun 7, 1994
Balancing Informant Privilege and Defendant's Rights in Search Warrant Affidavits Introduction The People v. Janet Marie Hobbs (7 Cal.4th 948, 1994) is a significant decision by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert