Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Equitable Estoppel and Statute of Limitations in Libel Actions: Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries

Equitable Estoppel and Statute of Limitations in Libel Actions: Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries

Date: Jun 7, 1994
Equitable Estoppel and Statute of Limitations in Libel Actions: Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries Introduction The case Hal Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. serves as a...
Enforceability of Oral Settlement Agreements Before Quasi-Courts under CCP §664.6: In re Marriage of Farid and Shirin Assemi

Enforceability of Oral Settlement Agreements Before Quasi-Courts under CCP §664.6: In re Marriage of Farid and Shirin Assemi

Date: May 27, 1994
Enforceability of Oral Settlement Agreements Before Quasi-Courts under CCP §664.6: In re Marriage of Farid and Shirin Assemi Introduction In re Marriage of Farid and Shirin Assemi, 7 Cal.4th 896...
Reaffirmation of Rape Conviction under Revised Penal Code § 261(a)(2): Emphasis on Victim's Fear

Reaffirmation of Rape Conviction under Revised Penal Code § 261(a)(2): Emphasis on Victim's Fear

Date: May 24, 1994
Reaffirmation of Rape Conviction under Revised Penal Code § 261(a)(2): Emphasis on Victim's Fear Introduction The landmark case of The People v. Hector Guillermo Iniguez, decided by the Supreme Court...
Survival of the Doctrine of Imperfect Self-Defense under California Law: Analysis of In re Christian S.

Survival of the Doctrine of Imperfect Self-Defense under California Law: Analysis of In re Christian S.

Date: May 17, 1994
Survival of the Doctrine of Imperfect Self-Defense under California Law: Analysis of In re Christian S. Introduction In re Christian S., 7 Cal.4th 768 (1994), is a pivotal case addressed by the...
Fermino v. Fedco: Expanding the Scope of Workers' Compensation to Include False Imprisonment

Fermino v. Fedco: Expanding the Scope of Workers' Compensation to Include False Imprisonment

Date: May 13, 1994
Fermino v. Fedco: Expanding the Scope of Workers' Compensation to Include False Imprisonment Introduction Fermino v. Fedco, Inc. (7 Cal.4th 701, 1994) represents a significant development in...
Preemption of Local Zoning Merger Requirements Under the Subdivision Map Act: Analysis of JOHN M. MOREHART v. COUNTY OF SANTABARBARA

Preemption of Local Zoning Merger Requirements Under the Subdivision Map Act: Analysis of JOHN M. MOREHART v. COUNTY OF SANTABARBARA

Date: May 13, 1994
Preemption of Local Zoning Merger Requirements Under the Subdivision Map Act: Analysis of JOHN M. MOREHART v. COUNTY OF SANTABARBARA Introduction JOHN M. MOREHART et al. v. COUNTY OF SANTABARBARA et...
Extension of Litigation Privilege to Private Arbitration Proceedings

Extension of Litigation Privilege to Private Arbitration Proceedings

Date: Apr 29, 1994
Extension of Litigation Privilege to Private Arbitration Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Ophelia Y. Moore et al. v. Milton Conliffe (7 Cal.4th 634, 1994), the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of California Limits Tort Liability in Conspiracy to Interfere with Contract

Supreme Court of California Limits Tort Liability in Conspiracy to Interfere with Contract

Date: Apr 1, 1994
Supreme Court of California Limits Tort Liability in Conspiracy to Interfere with Contract Introduction Applied Equipment Corporation v. Litton Saudi Arabia Limited et al. (7 Cal.4th 503) is a...
Affirming MMBA Rights for Local Government Attorneys: Protection Against Discharge for Enforcing Employee Rights

Affirming MMBA Rights for Local Government Attorneys: Protection Against Discharge for Enforcing Employee Rights

Date: Apr 1, 1994
Affirming MMBA Rights for Local Government Attorneys: Protection Against Discharge for Enforcing Employee Rights Introduction The landmark case of Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Association v....
California Supreme Court Establishes Broader Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Misconduct Evidence in People v. Ewaldt

California Supreme Court Establishes Broader Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Misconduct Evidence in People v. Ewaldt

Date: Mar 1, 1994
California Supreme Court Establishes Broader Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Misconduct Evidence in People v. Ewaldt Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case of People v....
Admissibility of Voluntary Intoxication in Implied Malice Murder Cases: People v. Whitfield Analysis

Admissibility of Voluntary Intoxication in Implied Malice Murder Cases: People v. Whitfield Analysis

Date: Mar 1, 1994
Admissibility of Voluntary Intoxication in Implied Malice Murder Cases: People v. Whitfield Analysis Introduction People v. Whitfield, 7 Cal.4th 437 (1994), is a pivotal case in California law that...
Balcom v. People: Admissibility of Uncharged Offenses to Establish Common Design or Plan

Balcom v. People: Admissibility of Uncharged Offenses to Establish Common Design or Plan

Date: Mar 1, 1994
Balcom v. People: Admissibility of Uncharged Offenses to Establish Common Design or Plan Introduction Balcom v. People is a seminal 1994 decision by the Supreme Court of California that reshaped the...
Jurisdiction in International Child Custody Cases under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of In re Stephanie M.

Jurisdiction in International Child Custody Cases under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of In re Stephanie M.

Date: Feb 25, 1994
Jurisdiction in International Child Custody Cases under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of In re Stephanie M. Introduction In re Stephanie M. is a landmark case...
Strict Enforcement of No Contest Clauses Against Community Property and ERISA Challenges: California Supreme Court Upholds Precedent

Strict Enforcement of No Contest Clauses Against Community Property and ERISA Challenges: California Supreme Court Upholds Precedent

Date: Feb 8, 1994
Strict Enforcement of No Contest Clauses Against Community Property and ERISA Challenges: California Supreme Court Upholds Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Marlene Burch v. Randall...
Clarifying General Intent in Assault with a Deadly Weapon: The People v. Colantuono Decision

Clarifying General Intent in Assault with a Deadly Weapon: The People v. Colantuono Decision

Date: Feb 1, 1994
Clarifying General Intent in Assault with a Deadly Weapon: The People v. Colantuono Decision Introduction The landmark case of The People v. Vernon Colantuono (7 Cal.4th 206, 1994) addresses the...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Juvenile Criminal Capacity Under Penal Code Section 26

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Juvenile Criminal Capacity Under Penal Code Section 26

Date: Feb 1, 1994
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Juvenile Criminal Capacity Under Penal Code Section 26 Introduction The case of In re Manuel L. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 229 reaffirmed and clarified the...
NCAA Drug Testing Program Upheld: California Supreme Court Affirms Privacy Rights Apply to Private Entities

NCAA Drug Testing Program Upheld: California Supreme Court Affirms Privacy Rights Apply to Private Entities

Date: Jan 29, 1994
NCAA Drug Testing Program Upheld: California Supreme Court Affirms Privacy Rights Apply to Private Entities Introduction The case of Jennifer Hill et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association...
Supreme Court Affirms Admissibility of Prior DUI Evidence in Gross Negligence Determinations

Supreme Court Affirms Admissibility of Prior DUI Evidence in Gross Negligence Determinations

Date: Dec 31, 1993
Supreme Court Affirms Admissibility of Prior DUI Evidence in Gross Negligence Determinations Introduction The People v. Alberto Ochoa is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Defining Government Agencies as Victims in Restitution Orders: People v. Crow

Defining Government Agencies as Victims in Restitution Orders: People v. Crow

Date: Dec 31, 1993
Defining Government Agencies as Victims in Restitution Orders: People v. Crow Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Terry Lee Crow, Defendant and Appellant. Court: Supreme Court...
Defining "Significant New Information" Under CEQA: Laurel Heights Improvement Association v. Regents of UC

Defining "Significant New Information" Under CEQA: Laurel Heights Improvement Association v. Regents of UC

Date: Dec 31, 1993
Defining "Significant New Information" Under CEQA: Laurel Heights Improvement Association v. Regents of UC Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) mandates that public agencies...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert