Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Clarifying Bifurcation of Prior Convictions: People v. Calderon Sets New Guidelines

Clarifying Bifurcation of Prior Convictions: People v. Calderon Sets New Guidelines

Date: Dec 23, 1994
Clarifying Bifurcation of Prior Convictions: People v. Calderon Sets New Guidelines Introduction People v. Calvin Calderon (9 Cal.4th 69) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Crittenden: Establishing Standards for Death Penalty Juror Selection and Torture-Murder Special Circumstances

Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Crittenden: Establishing Standards for Death Penalty Juror Selection and Torture-Murder Special Circumstances

Date: Dec 23, 1994
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Crittenden: Establishing Standards for Death Penalty Juror Selection and Torture-Murder Special Circumstances Introduction People v. Crittenden (9 Cal.4th 83,...
Clarification on Kidnapping with Intent to Rape under California Penal Code Section 208(d)

Clarification on Kidnapping with Intent to Rape under California Penal Code Section 208(d)

Date: Dec 20, 1994
Clarification on Kidnapping with Intent to Rape under California Penal Code Section 208(d) Introduction The case of The People v. Jessie Rayford (9 Cal.4th 1) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
California Supreme Court Rules Workers' Compensation Insurers Have No Duty to Defend Civil Wrongful Termination Claims

California Supreme Court Rules Workers' Compensation Insurers Have No Duty to Defend Civil Wrongful Termination Claims

Date: Dec 20, 1994
California Supreme Court Rules Workers' Compensation Insurers Have No Duty to Defend Civil Wrongful Termination Claims Introduction In the landmark case of La Jolla Beach and Tennis Club, Inc. v....
Retroactive Application of Temporarily Enhanced Penalties: In re PEDRO T.

Retroactive Application of Temporarily Enhanced Penalties: In re PEDRO T.

Date: Dec 13, 1994
Retroactive Application of Temporarily Enhanced Penalties: In re PEDRO T. Introduction In the landmark case In re PEDRO T., decided by the Supreme Court of California on December 12, 1994, the court...
Limits on Verdict Modification Under Penal Code §1181 Subdiv. 6: People v. Lagunas

Limits on Verdict Modification Under Penal Code §1181 Subdiv. 6: People v. Lagunas

Date: Dec 13, 1994
Limits on Verdict Modification Under Penal Code §1181 Subdiv. 6: People v. Lagunas Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Frank Joe Lagunas, decided by the Supreme Court of California on...
Exclusionary Rule Not Applied in LPS Act Conservatorship Proceedings: Conser v. Torship of the Person

Exclusionary Rule Not Applied in LPS Act Conservatorship Proceedings: Conser v. Torship of the Person

Date: Dec 9, 1994
Exclusionary Rule Not Applied in LPS Act Conservatorship Proceedings: Conser v. Torship of the Person Introduction In the landmark case Conser v. Torship of the Person and Estate of Susan T.,...
Unified Approach to Negligence: Supreme Court of California Reaffirms Single Standard in Ordinary and Professional Negligence Cases

Unified Approach to Negligence: Supreme Court of California Reaffirms Single Standard in Ordinary and Professional Negligence Cases

Date: Dec 6, 1994
Unified Approach to Negligence: Supreme Court of California Reaffirms Single Standard in Ordinary and Professional Negligence Cases Introduction The case of Darlene Flowers v. Torrance Memorial...
Rodrigues v. The People: Upholding the Death Penalty in the Context of Multiple Aggravating Factors

Rodrigues v. The People: Upholding the Death Penalty in the Context of Multiple Aggravating Factors

Date: Dec 2, 1994
Rodrigues v. The People: Upholding the Death Penalty in the Context of Multiple Aggravating Factors Introduction Rodrigues v. The People is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Authority of Counsel to Waive Jury Trial Over Defendant's Objection in Competency Proceedings: Analysis of People v. Masterson

Authority of Counsel to Waive Jury Trial Over Defendant's Objection in Competency Proceedings: Analysis of People v. Masterson

Date: Dec 2, 1994
Authority of Counsel to Waive Jury Trial Over Defendant's Objection in Competency Proceedings: Analysis of People v. Masterson Introduction People v. Michael Todd Masterson (8 Cal.4th 965, Supreme...
Setting Aside Default Judgments Due to Clerical Errors and Misleading Legal Advice: Analysis of Rappleyea v. Campbell

Setting Aside Default Judgments Due to Clerical Errors and Misleading Legal Advice: Analysis of Rappleyea v. Campbell

Date: Dec 2, 1994
Setting aside Default Judgments Due to Clerical Errors and Misleading Legal Advice: Analysis of Rappleyea v. Campbell Introduction In the landmark case of Rappleyea v. Campbell (1994) 8 Cal.4th 975,...
Santamaria v. People: California Supreme Court Limits Collateral Estoppel in Double Jeopardy Cases

Santamaria v. People: California Supreme Court Limits Collateral Estoppel in Double Jeopardy Cases

Date: Nov 29, 1994
Santamaria v. People: California Supreme Court Limits Collateral Estoppel in Double Jeopardy Cases Introduction Santamaria v. People, 8 Cal.4th 903 (1994), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Debt Restructuring Exempt from Usury Law: Ghirardo v. Antonioli

Debt Restructuring Exempt from Usury Law: Ghirardo v. Antonioli

Date: Nov 29, 1994
Debt Restructuring Exempt from Usury Law: Ghirardo v. Antonioli Introduction The Ghirardo v. Antonioli case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on November 28, 1994, addresses the...
Reformulation of the Fresh-Complaint Doctrine in Admissibility of Extrajudicial Statements: PEOPLE v. BROWN

Reformulation of the Fresh-Complaint Doctrine in Admissibility of Extrajudicial Statements: PEOPLE v. BROWN

Date: Nov 18, 1994
Reformulation of the Fresh-Complaint Doctrine in Admissibility of Extrajudicial Statements: PEOPLE v. BROWN Introduction People v. Ricky Lee Brown, 8 Cal.4th 746 (1994), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Procedure Requirements for Habeas Corpus Relief Established in Romero v. The People

Procedure Requirements for Habeas Corpus Relief Established in Romero v. The People

Date: Nov 11, 1994
Procedure Requirements for Habeas Corpus Relief Established in Romero v. The People Introduction Romero v. The People (1994) is a pivotal judgment by the Supreme Court of California that addresses...
College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior Court: Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Healthcare Litigation

College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior Court: Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Healthcare Litigation

Date: Nov 1, 1994
College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior Court: Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Healthcare Litigation Introduction In College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior Court of Orange County, 8 Cal.4th 704...
Reaffirmation of Bertero Rule in Malicious Prosecution: Crowley v. Katleman et al.

Reaffirmation of Bertero Rule in Malicious Prosecution: Crowley v. Katleman et al.

Date: Nov 1, 1994
Reaffirmation of Bertero Rule in Malicious Prosecution: Crowley v. Katleman et al. Introduction In the Supreme Court of California case Arthur J. Crowley v. Carole Katleman et al. (8 Cal.4th 666,...
California Supreme Court Upholds Kelly/Frye Standard for Admitting HGN Test Evidence in DUI Cases

California Supreme Court Upholds Kelly/Frye Standard for Admitting HGN Test Evidence in DUI Cases

Date: Oct 28, 1994
California Supreme Court Upholds Kelly/Frye Standard for Admitting HGN Test Evidence in DUI Cases Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. WILLIAM MICHAEL LEAHY, decided on October 27,...
Enhancing Product Liability Standards: The Soule v. General Motors Decision

Enhancing Product Liability Standards: The Soule v. General Motors Decision

Date: Oct 28, 1994
Enhancing Product Liability Standards: The Soule v. General Motors Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Soule v. General Motors Corporation, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Clarification on Reasonable Doubt Instructions Affirmed in People v. Freeman

Clarification on Reasonable Doubt Instructions Affirmed in People v. Freeman

Date: Oct 25, 1994
Clarification on Reasonable Doubt Instructions Affirmed in People v. Freeman Introduction The People v. Fred Harlan Freeman is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert