Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Reversing Time-Barred Second Asbestos Claim: Hamilton v. Asbestos Corporation Introduction Hamilton v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of California...
Affirmation of In-House Counsel’s Right to Recover Attorney Fees Under Civil Code §1717: PLCM Group v. Drexler Introduction The case of PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler (2000) adjudicated by the Supreme...
People v. Jenkins: Upholding Capital Murder Conviction and Procedural Safeguards in High-Stakes Trials Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Daniel Steven Jenkins (22 Cal.4th 900, 2000), the...
Recognition of Psychological Harm in Aggravated Kidnapping: People v. Nguyen Sets New Precedent Introduction People v. Nguyen (22 Cal.4th 872, 2000) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Terry Douglas Bemore v. The People: Establishing Precedent on Torture-Murder and Effective Representation in Capital Cases Introduction Terry Douglas Bemore v. The People (22 Cal.4th 809) is a...
Arbitral Finality and Interpretation of Attorney Fees Clauses: Insights from Moshonov v. Walsh Introduction The case of Robin Moshonov v. John D. Walsh et al., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Martinez v. The People: Clarifying the State and Federal Speedy Trial Rights in California Introduction In Martinez v. The People (22 Cal.4th 750, 2000), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Establishment of Strict Standards for Jury Instructions in Capital Cases: People v. Waidla Introduction People v. Tauno Waidla (22 Cal.4th 690, 2000) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Factual Impossibility Does Not Preclude Conviction Under Prop 187's Section 113 Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Jose Rizo et al., decided by the Supreme Court of California on April...
Full Application of Firearm Use Enhancements in Indeterminate Sentencing: THE PEOPLE v. PATRICK P. FELIX Introduction The landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. PATRICK P. FELIX (22 Cal.4th 651) addressed...
Compulsory Travel Time as Compensable Hours: Morillion v. Royal Packing Company Introduction Morillion v. Royal Packing Company is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Affirmation of Felony-Murder Conviction and Procedural Standards: People v. Sakarias Introduction People v. Peter Sakarias (22 Cal.4th 596, 2000) is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Paz v. State of California: Negligent Undertaking and Duty of Care in Public Safety Projects Introduction The case of Francisco Paz vs. State of California et al. (22 Cal.4th 550) adjudicated by the...
People v. Hernandez: Reinforcing the Integrity of Insanity Pleas under Penal Code §1385(a) Introduction People v. Hernandez (22 Cal.4th 512, 2000) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Balancing Adoption and Parental Relationships in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings: Insights from In Re Jasmine D. Introduction In Re Jasmine D. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Court of Appeal of...
Liability of Municipal Entities under Government Code §815.6: An Analysis of Paul Haggis v. City of Los Angeles Introduction Paul Haggis v. City of Los Angeles (22 Cal.4th 490) is a pivotal case...
Lane v. Hughes Aircraft Co.: Reinforcing Standards for New Trial Orders and Punitive Damages Evaluation Introduction Lane v. Hughes Aircraft Co. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Rule 412(b) and Section 654: Establishing Clear Boundaries on Double Punishment in The People v. George R. Hester Introduction The People v. George R. Hester, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying Double Jeopardy Protections: California Supreme Court’s Ruling in People v. Hatch Introduction People v. Daniel William Hatch is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Reinforcing Trial Court Discretion on Evidence and Procedures in Death Penalty Cases: People v. Richard Louis Arnold Phillips Introduction People v. Richard Louis Arnold Phillips (22 Cal.4th 226) is...