Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Deferred Entry of Judgment Restricts Immediate Appeal after No Contest Plea: PEOPLE v. MAZURETTE

Deferred Entry of Judgment Restricts Immediate Appeal after No Contest Plea: PEOPLE v. MAZURETTE

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Deferred Entry of Judgment Restricts Immediate Appeal after No Contest Plea: PEOPLE v. MAZURETTE Introduction In PEOPLE v. MAZURETTE (24 Cal.4th 789, 2001), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Workers' Compensation Exclusivity and Its Limits: Insights from Vacanti v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

Workers' Compensation Exclusivity and Its Limits: Insights from Vacanti v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Workers' Compensation Exclusivity and Its Limits: Insights from Vacanti v. State Compensation Insurance Fund Introduction Vacanti v. State Compensation Insurance Fund et al. (24 Cal.4th 800, 2001) is...
Supreme Court Limits Postdischarge Amendments of Prior Convictions Under Penal Code §1025(b)

Supreme Court Limits Postdischarge Amendments of Prior Convictions Under Penal Code §1025(b)

Date: Dec 29, 2000
Supreme Court Limits Postdischarge Amendments of Prior Convictions Under Penal Code §1025(b) Introduction In People v. Robert Tindall (24 Cal.4th 767, 2000), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Deputy Public Defenders and Legal Malpractice: Scope of Government Code §820.2 Immunity Affirmed

Deputy Public Defenders and Legal Malpractice: Scope of Government Code §820.2 Immunity Affirmed

Date: Dec 19, 2000
Deputy Public Defenders and Legal Malpractice: Scope of Government Code §820.2 Immunity Affirmed Introduction Glenn Russell Barner v. Julie Leeds (24 Cal.4th 676) is a landmark decision by the...
Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections in Hearsay Exceptions for Accomplice Testimony

Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections in Hearsay Exceptions for Accomplice Testimony

Date: Dec 5, 2000
Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections in Hearsay Exceptions for Accomplice Testimony Introduction The People v. Danny Duarte, 24 Cal.4th 603 (2000), marks a significant development in the...
Economic Loss Rule Reinforced in Construction Defect Negligence Claims: Alan O. Aas et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County Analysis

Economic Loss Rule Reinforced in Construction Defect Negligence Claims: Alan O. Aas et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County Analysis

Date: Dec 5, 2000
Economic Loss Rule Reinforced in Construction Defect Negligence Claims: Alan O. Aas et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County Analysis Introduction The case of Alan O. Aas et al. v. The...
Enhanced Free Speech Protections Under California’s Constitution: Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons

Enhanced Free Speech Protections Under California’s Constitution: Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons

Date: Nov 28, 2000
Enhanced Free Speech Protections Under California’s Constitution: Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons Introduction Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. William J. Lyons Jr. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Staten v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty Under Special Circumstances

Staten v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty Under Special Circumstances

Date: Nov 10, 2000
Staten v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty Under Special Circumstances Introduction The People v. Deondre Arthur Staten, 24 Cal.4th 434 (2000), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Supreme Court of California Upholds Strict State Standards for Milk Products over Federal Alternatives

Supreme Court of California Upholds Strict State Standards for Milk Products over Federal Alternatives

Date: Nov 7, 2000
Supreme Court of California Upholds Strict State Standards for Milk Products over Federal Alternatives Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, as Attorney General, etc.,...
Amador: Minor Discrepancies in Search Warrants Do Not Necessarily Warrant Evidence Suppression

Amador: Minor Discrepancies in Search Warrants Do Not Necessarily Warrant Evidence Suppression

Date: Oct 17, 2000
Amador: Minor Discrepancies in Search Warrants Do Not Necessarily Warrant Evidence Suppression Introduction The People v. Luis Amador, 24 Cal.4th 387 (2000), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Implied Employment Contract Limits on At-Will Termination: Guz v. Bechtel National Inc.

Implied Employment Contract Limits on At-Will Termination: Guz v. Bechtel National Inc.

Date: Oct 6, 2000
Implied Employment Contract Limits on At-Will Termination: Guz v. Bechtel National Inc. Introduction Guz v. Bechtel National Inc. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Clarifying 'Same Occasion' and 'Same Set of Operative Facts' in California's Three Strikes Law: PEOPLE v. LAWRENCE

Clarifying 'Same Occasion' and 'Same Set of Operative Facts' in California's Three Strikes Law: PEOPLE v. LAWRENCE

Date: Aug 29, 2000
Clarifying 'Same Occasion' and 'Same Set of Operative Facts' in California's Three Strikes Law: PEOPLE v. LAWRENCE Introduction People v. Jimmy Dale Lawrence (24 Cal.4th 219, 2000) is a pivotal case...
Preserving Adversarial Integrity in Jury Selection: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. AYALA

Preserving Adversarial Integrity in Jury Selection: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. AYALA

Date: Aug 29, 2000
Preserving Adversarial Integrity in Jury Selection: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. AYALA Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Hector Juan Ayala (24 Cal.4th 243, 2000), the Supreme Court of...
Exhaustion of Judicial Remedies as a Prerequisite for FEHA Claims: Johnson v. City of Loma Linda

Exhaustion of Judicial Remedies as a Prerequisite for FEHA Claims: Johnson v. City of Loma Linda

Date: Aug 25, 2000
Exhaustion of Judicial Remedies as a Prerequisite for FEHA Claims: Johnson v. City of Loma Linda Introduction Barry Johnson v. City of Loma Linda et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Establishing Limits on Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements: Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services

Establishing Limits on Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements: Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services

Date: Aug 25, 2000
Establishing Limits on Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements: Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services Introduction The case of Marybeth Armendariz et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,...
Establishing Precedents in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. MANUEL MENDOZA, 24 Cal.4th 130 (2000)

Establishing Precedents in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. MANUEL MENDOZA, 24 Cal.4th 130 (2000)

Date: Aug 25, 2000
Establishing Precedents in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. MANUEL MENDOZA, 24 Cal.4th 130 (2000) Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Manuel Mendoza, decided by the...
Voluntariness of Premarital Agreements: In re Marriage of Bonds

Voluntariness of Premarital Agreements: In re Marriage of Bonds

Date: Aug 22, 2000
Voluntariness of Premarital Agreements: In re Marriage of Bonds Introduction The case of In re the Marriage of Susann Margreth Bonds and Barry Lamar Bonds (24 Cal.4th 1, 2000) revolves around the...
Equitable Apportionment Must Respect Legal Water Rights: Insights from Mojave Water Agency v. Cardozo et al.

Equitable Apportionment Must Respect Legal Water Rights: Insights from Mojave Water Agency v. Cardozo et al.

Date: Aug 22, 2000
Equitable Apportionment Must Respect Legal Water Rights: Insights from Mojave Water Agency et al., v. Manuel Cardoza et al. Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in its 2000 decision for...
Balancing Witness Protection and Defendant Rights: The ALVARADO v. SUPERIOR COURT Decision

Balancing Witness Protection and Defendant Rights: The ALVARADO v. SUPERIOR COURT Decision

Date: Aug 18, 2000
Balancing Witness Protection and Defendant Rights: The ALVARADO v. SUPERIOR COURT Decision Introduction ALVARADO v. SUPERIOR COURT (23 Cal.4th 1121, 2000) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Box: Key Principles on Jury Selection and Capital Sentencing

Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Box: Key Principles on Jury Selection and Capital Sentencing

Date: Aug 18, 2000
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Box: Key Principles on Jury Selection and Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Christopher Clark Box, 23 Cal.4th 1153 (2000),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert