Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Minors Cannot be Accomplices in Incestuous Relationships: Insights from PEOPLE v. TOBIAS (2001) Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Joel Robert Tobias, Defendant and...
Broad Interpretation of Civil Code Section 3333.4: Limitations on Uninsured Motorists' Recovery Against Public Entities Introduction The case of Russell Glen DAY v. CITY OF FONTANA et al. (25 Cal.4th...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Immigration Consequences: Insights from In re Hugo Rangel Resendiz Introduction In re Hugo Rangel Resendiz, on Habeas Corpus. (25 Cal.4th 230, 2001) is a pivotal...
Murphy v. The People: Confirmation of Oral Copulation under Three Strikes Law and Habitual Sexual Offender Statute Introduction Murphy v. The People is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
CEQA Compliance Required for Public Agency-Generated Initiatives: Insights from FRIENDS OF SIERRA MADRE v. CITY OF SIERRA MADRE Introduction The California Supreme Court case Friends of Sierra Madre...
Interpretation of "Single Occasion" and "In the Commission Of" in Penal Code Sections 667.61(g) and 12022.3(a) Introduction The People v. Gregory Tommie Jones, 25 Cal.4th 98 (2001), is a landmark...
Voluntary Intoxication and General Intent: Establishing the Standard in Arson Cases Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Robert Nelson Atkins, decided by the Supreme Court of California...
Cal-Vet Home Protection Plan: Not Classified as Insurance Under California Insurance Code Introduction The landmark case Bruce Sweatman III v. Department of Veterans Affairs (25 Cal.4th 62, 2001)...
Precedent-Setting Ruling on Prosecutorial Conduct in PEOPLE v. MORALES Introduction People v. David Hans Morales, 25 Cal.4th 34 (2001), is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of California....
Narrowing Jury Trial Rights on Prior Convictions: Analysis of PEOPLE v. EPPS Introduction PEOPLE v. EPPS, 25 Cal.4th 19 (2001), is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of California that addresses...
Enhancement of Attorney Fees in Anti-SLAPP Motions: Insights from Smith A. Ketchum III v. John M. Moses Introduction The case Smith A. Ketchum III v. John M. Moses, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Limitation on Appellate Review of Judicial Disqualification: Only Parties May Seek Writ of Mandate Under CCP §170.3(d) Introduction Wilson CURLE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SHASTA COUNTY is a pivotal...
Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated Not a Lesser Included Offense of Murder: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Sanchez Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Sanchez, decided...
California Supreme Court Limits Insurer's Indemnification Duty to Court-Ordered Damages in Environmental Proceedings Introduction The case of Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, et al. v....
Strict Enforcement of Choice-of-Law Clauses in Nationwide Class Action Certification Introduction In the landmark case of Washington Mutual Bank, FA, v. The Superior Court of Orange County, the...
Independent Appellate Review for Due Diligence in Confrontation Clause Cases Introduction The case of The People v. Freddie Lee Cromer (24 Cal.4th 889) addresses a pivotal issue regarding the...
Insurance Coverage and Intangible Property Rights: Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. Introduction Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of California Abolishes Rule of Consistency in Conspiracy Cases Introduction The case of The People v. Floyd Maurice Palmer et al. (24 Cal.4th 856) represents a significant shift in...
Robbery Requires Possession: California Supreme Court Reaffirms Traditional Interpretation Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Thuan Van NGUYEN et al.,...
Correction of Parole Revocation Fines in Sentencing: People v. Donte Osbon Smith et al. Introduction The case People v. Donte Osbon Smith et al. (24 Cal.4th 849) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...