Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Minors Cannot be Accomplices in Incestuous Relationships: Insights from PEOPLE v. TOBIAS (2001)

Minors Cannot be Accomplices in Incestuous Relationships: Insights from PEOPLE v. TOBIAS (2001)

Date: Apr 27, 2001
Minors Cannot be Accomplices in Incestuous Relationships: Insights from PEOPLE v. TOBIAS (2001) Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Joel Robert Tobias, Defendant and...
Civil Code Section 3333.4: Limitations on Uninsured Motorists' Recovery Against Public Entities

Civil Code Section 3333.4: Limitations on Uninsured Motorists' Recovery Against Public Entities

Date: Apr 6, 2001
Broad Interpretation of Civil Code Section 3333.4: Limitations on Uninsured Motorists' Recovery Against Public Entities Introduction The case of Russell Glen DAY v. CITY OF FONTANA et al. (25 Cal.4th...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Immigration Consequences: Insights from In re Hugo Rangel Resendiz

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Immigration Consequences: Insights from In re Hugo Rangel Resendiz

Date: Apr 3, 2001
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Immigration Consequences: Insights from In re Hugo Rangel Resendiz Introduction In re Hugo Rangel Resendiz, on Habeas Corpus. (25 Cal.4th 230, 2001) is a pivotal...
Murphy v. The People: Confirmation of Oral Copulation under Three Strikes Law and Habitual Sexual Offender Statute

Murphy v. The People: Confirmation of Oral Copulation under Three Strikes Law and Habitual Sexual Offender Statute

Date: Mar 30, 2001
Murphy v. The People: Confirmation of Oral Copulation under Three Strikes Law and Habitual Sexual Offender Statute Introduction Murphy v. The People is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
CEQA Compliance Required for Public Agency-Generated Initiatives: Insights from FRIENDS OF SIERRA MADRE v. CITY OF SIERRA MADRE

CEQA Compliance Required for Public Agency-Generated Initiatives: Insights from FRIENDS OF SIERRA MADRE v. CITY OF SIERRA MADRE

Date: Mar 30, 2001
CEQA Compliance Required for Public Agency-Generated Initiatives: Insights from FRIENDS OF SIERRA MADRE v. CITY OF SIERRA MADRE Introduction The California Supreme Court case Friends of Sierra Madre...
Interpretation of "Single Occasion" and "In the Commission Of" in Penal Code Sections 667.61(g) and 12022.3(a)

Interpretation of "Single Occasion" and "In the Commission Of" in Penal Code Sections 667.61(g) and 12022.3(a)

Date: Mar 16, 2001
Interpretation of "Single Occasion" and "In the Commission Of" in Penal Code Sections 667.61(g) and 12022.3(a) Introduction The People v. Gregory Tommie Jones, 25 Cal.4th 98 (2001), is a landmark...
Voluntary Intoxication and General Intent: Establishing the Standard in Arson Cases

Voluntary Intoxication and General Intent: Establishing the Standard in Arson Cases

Date: Mar 13, 2001
Voluntary Intoxication and General Intent: Establishing the Standard in Arson Cases Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Robert Nelson Atkins, decided by the Supreme Court of California...
Cal-Vet Home Protection Plan: Not Classified as Insurance Under California Insurance Code

Cal-Vet Home Protection Plan: Not Classified as Insurance Under California Insurance Code

Date: Mar 9, 2001
Cal-Vet Home Protection Plan: Not Classified as Insurance Under California Insurance Code Introduction The landmark case Bruce Sweatman III v. Department of Veterans Affairs (25 Cal.4th 62, 2001)...
Precedent-Setting Ruling on Prosecutorial Conduct in PEOPLE v. MORALES

Precedent-Setting Ruling on Prosecutorial Conduct in PEOPLE v. MORALES

Date: Mar 6, 2001
Precedent-Setting Ruling on Prosecutorial Conduct in PEOPLE v. MORALES Introduction People v. David Hans Morales, 25 Cal.4th 34 (2001), is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of California....
Narrowing Jury Trial Rights on Prior Convictions: Analysis of PEOPLE v. EPPS

Narrowing Jury Trial Rights on Prior Convictions: Analysis of PEOPLE v. EPPS

Date: Mar 6, 2001
Narrowing Jury Trial Rights on Prior Convictions: Analysis of PEOPLE v. EPPS Introduction PEOPLE v. EPPS, 25 Cal.4th 19 (2001), is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of California that addresses...
Enhancement of Attorney Fees in Anti-SLAPP Motions: Insights from Smith A. Ketchum III v. John M. Moses

Enhancement of Attorney Fees in Anti-SLAPP Motions: Insights from Smith A. Ketchum III v. John M. Moses

Date: Feb 27, 2001
Enhancement of Attorney Fees in Anti-SLAPP Motions: Insights from Smith A. Ketchum III v. John M. Moses Introduction The case Smith A. Ketchum III v. John M. Moses, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Limitation on Appellate Review of Judicial Disqualification: Only Parties May Seek Writ of Mandate Under CCP §170.3(d)

Limitation on Appellate Review of Judicial Disqualification: Only Parties May Seek Writ of Mandate Under CCP §170.3(d)

Date: Feb 9, 2001
Limitation on Appellate Review of Judicial Disqualification: Only Parties May Seek Writ of Mandate Under CCP §170.3(d) Introduction Wilson CURLE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SHASTA COUNTY is a pivotal...
Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated Not a Lesser Included Offense of Murder: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Sanchez

Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated Not a Lesser Included Offense of Murder: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Sanchez

Date: Feb 6, 2001
Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated Not a Lesser Included Offense of Murder: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Sanchez Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Sanchez, decided...
California Supreme Court Limits Insurer's Indemnification Duty to Court-Ordered Damages in Environmental Proceedings

California Supreme Court Limits Insurer's Indemnification Duty to Court-Ordered Damages in Environmental Proceedings

Date: Feb 2, 2001
California Supreme Court Limits Insurer's Indemnification Duty to Court-Ordered Damages in Environmental Proceedings Introduction The case of Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, et al. v....
Strict Enforcement of Choice-of-Law Clauses in Nationwide Class Action Certification

Strict Enforcement of Choice-of-Law Clauses in Nationwide Class Action Certification

Date: Jan 26, 2001
Strict Enforcement of Choice-of-Law Clauses in Nationwide Class Action Certification Introduction In the landmark case of Washington Mutual Bank, FA, v. The Superior Court of Orange County, the...
Independent Appellate Review for Due Diligence in Confrontation Clause Cases

Independent Appellate Review for Due Diligence in Confrontation Clause Cases

Date: Jan 23, 2001
Independent Appellate Review for Due Diligence in Confrontation Clause Cases Introduction The case of The People v. Freddie Lee Cromer (24 Cal.4th 889) addresses a pivotal issue regarding the...
Insurance Coverage and Intangible Property Rights: Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.

Insurance Coverage and Intangible Property Rights: Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.

Date: Jan 19, 2001
Insurance Coverage and Intangible Property Rights: Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. Introduction Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of California Abolishes Rule of Consistency in Conspiracy Cases

Supreme Court of California Abolishes Rule of Consistency in Conspiracy Cases

Date: Jan 19, 2001
Supreme Court of California Abolishes Rule of Consistency in Conspiracy Cases Introduction The case of The People v. Floyd Maurice Palmer et al. (24 Cal.4th 856) represents a significant shift in...
Robbery Requires Possession: California Supreme Court Reaffirms Traditional Interpretation

Robbery Requires Possession: California Supreme Court Reaffirms Traditional Interpretation

Date: Jan 18, 2001
Robbery Requires Possession: California Supreme Court Reaffirms Traditional Interpretation Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Thuan Van NGUYEN et al.,...
Correction of Parole Revocation Fines in Sentencing: People v. Donte Osbon Smith et al.

Correction of Parole Revocation Fines in Sentencing: People v. Donte Osbon Smith et al.

Date: Jan 12, 2001
Correction of Parole Revocation Fines in Sentencing: People v. Donte Osbon Smith et al. Introduction The case People v. Donte Osbon Smith et al. (24 Cal.4th 849) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert