Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Clarifying Entrapment Standards in Decoy Police Operations: People v. Watson

Clarifying Entrapment Standards in Decoy Police Operations: People v. Watson

Date: Jan 21, 2000
Clarifying Entrapment Standards in Decoy Police Operations: People v. Watson Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Tray Edward Watson, Defendant and Appellant, decided by...
Attorney-Client Privilege Affirmed in Trustee-Beneficiary Disputes: Insights from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Attorney-Client Privilege Affirmed in Trustee-Beneficiary Disputes: Insights from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Date: Jan 14, 2000
Attorney-Client Privilege Affirmed in Trustee-Beneficiary Disputes: Insights from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction The case of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v....
Admissibility of Uncertified Computer Printouts under Official Records Exception in People v. Martinez

Admissibility of Uncertified Computer Printouts under Official Records Exception in People v. Martinez

Date: Jan 11, 2000
Admissibility of Uncertified Computer Printouts under Official Records Exception in People v. Martinez Introduction The case of The People v. Larry Salvador Martinez (22 Cal.4th 106, 2000) presented...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Murder-for-Hire Case and Upholding Joint Trial Procedures

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Murder-for-Hire Case and Upholding Joint Trial Procedures

Date: Jan 7, 2000
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Murder-for-Hire Case and Upholding Joint Trial Procedures Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Curtis Lee Ervin, Defendant and Appellant. Court:...
Defendant Bears Burden of Proof for Discovery Period in Attorney Malpractice Claims

Defendant Bears Burden of Proof for Discovery Period in Attorney Malpractice Claims

Date: Dec 31, 1999
Defendant Bears Burden of Proof for Discovery Period in Attorney Malpractice Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Arlayna Samuels v. Terence J. Mix et al., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirmation of Standards for Juror Misconduct and Change of Venue in Criminal Trials: People v. Royal Kenneth Hayes

Reaffirmation of Standards for Juror Misconduct and Change of Venue in Criminal Trials: People v. Royal Kenneth Hayes

Date: Dec 24, 1999
Reaffirmation of Standards for Juror Misconduct and Change of Venue in Criminal Trials Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Royal Kenneth Hayes (21 Cal.4th 1211, 1999), the Supreme Court of...
Best Interests Requirement in Section 388 Petitions: Insights from In re Zachary G.

Best Interests Requirement in Section 388 Petitions: Insights from In re Zachary G.

Date: Dec 21, 1999
Best Interests Requirement in Section 388 Petitions: Insights from In re Zachary G. Introduction In re Zachary G. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Court of Appeal of California's Fourth District...
Establishing Foreseeability Threshold for Landlord Security Obligations in Commercial Parking Garages

Establishing Foreseeability Threshold for Landlord Security Obligations in Commercial Parking Garages

Date: Dec 17, 1999
Establishing the Foreseeability Threshold for Landlord Security Obligations in Commercial Parking Garages Introduction In the landmark case of SHARON P. v. ARMAN, LTD., the Supreme Court of...
Cal. Sup. Ct. Establishes Right to Section 4019 Conduct Credits for Non-Violent Three Strikes Defendants

Cal. Sup. Ct. Establishes Right to Section 4019 Conduct Credits for Non-Violent Three Strikes Defendants

Date: Dec 7, 1999
Cal. Sup. Ct. Establishes Right to Section 4019 Conduct Credits for Non-Violent Three Strikes Defendants Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Otis Michael Thomas, the Supreme Court of...
Limitations on Advertising Liability Coverage for Title Infringement Under Insurance Policy

Limitations on Advertising Liability Coverage for Title Infringement Under Insurance Policy

Date: Dec 7, 1999
Limitations on Advertising Liability Coverage for Title Infringement Under Insurance Policy Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in Palmer v. Truck Insurance Exchange et al., 21...
Arbitration of Consumer Legal Remedies Act Claims: Damages Are Arbitrable, Injunctive Relief Is Not

Arbitration of Consumer Legal Remedies Act Claims: Damages Are Arbitrable, Injunctive Relief Is Not

Date: Dec 3, 1999
Arbitration of Consumer Legal Remedies Act Claims: Damages Are Arbitrable, Injunctive Relief Is Not Introduction The case of Adrian Broughton, Jr., a Minor, et al. v. Cigna Healthplans of California...
Affirmation of Death Sentence: Upholding Procedural Integrity in PEOPLE v. CARPENTER

Affirmation of Death Sentence: Upholding Procedural Integrity in PEOPLE v. CARPENTER

Date: Nov 30, 1999
Affirmation of Death Sentence: Upholding Procedural Integrity in PEOPLE v. CARPENTER Introduction People v. David Joseph Carpenter, 21 Cal.4th 1016 (1999), represents a pivotal case in the realm of...
Supreme Court of California Establishes Clarified Obligations for County Health Care Under Welfare and Institutions Code §17000

Supreme Court of California Establishes Clarified Obligations for County Health Care Under Welfare and Institutions Code §17000

Date: Nov 23, 1999
Supreme Court of California Establishes Clarified Obligations for County Health Care Under Welfare and Institutions Code §17000 Introduction In the landmark case Jim Hunt, et al. v. The Superior...
Withdrawal or Amendment of Deemed Admissions Under CCP § 2033: Wilcox v. Birtwhistle

Withdrawal or Amendment of Deemed Admissions Under CCP § 2033: Wilcox v. Birtwhistle

Date: Nov 23, 1999
Withdrawal or Amendment of Deemed Admissions Under CCP § 2033: Wilcox v. Birtwhistle Introduction In the landmark case of Mark Lee Wilcox, et al. v. William Birtwhistle, decided by the Supreme Court...
Recognition and Limitation of the Claim-of-Right Defense in Robbery: People v. Tufunga

Recognition and Limitation of the Claim-of-Right Defense in Robbery: People v. Tufunga

Date: Nov 16, 1999
Recognition and Limitation of the Claim-of-Right Defense in Robbery: People v. Tufunga Introduction In People v. Halaliku Kaloni Tufunga (1999) 21 Cal.4th 935, the Supreme Court of California...
Establishing Single Offense Liability in Gang-Related Assaults: Analysis of People v. Zermeno

Establishing Single Offense Liability in Gang-Related Assaults: Analysis of People v. Zermeno

Date: Nov 5, 1999
Establishing Single Offense Liability in Gang-Related Assaults: Analysis of People v. Zermeno Introduction People v. Javier Francisco Zermeno is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirming Evidence Code §1108: Propensity Evidence in Sex Offense Cases

Affirming Evidence Code §1108: Propensity Evidence in Sex Offense Cases

Date: Nov 2, 1999
Affirming Evidence Code §1108: Propensity Evidence in Sex Offense Cases Introduction The People v. Charles Anthony Falsetta (21 Cal.4th 903, 1999) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Mens Rea Required for Methamphetamine Manufacturing under Health & Safety Code §11379.6(a): Coria v. The People

Mens Rea Required for Methamphetamine Manufacturing under Health & Safety Code §11379.6(a): Coria v. The People

Date: Oct 29, 1999
Mens Rea Required for Methamphetamine Manufacturing under Health & Safety Code §11379.6(a): Coria v. The People Introduction Coria v. The People (21 Cal.4th 868, 1999) addressed a critical issue in...
People v. Allen: Upholding Dual Convictions for Receiving Stolen Property and Burglary

People v. Allen: Upholding Dual Convictions for Receiving Stolen Property and Burglary

Date: Oct 8, 1999
People v. Allen: Upholding Dual Convictions for Receiving Stolen Property and Burglary Introduction People v. Andrew James Allen (21 Cal.4th 846) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Nonmutual Collateral Estoppel in Private Arbitration: Vandenberg v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

Nonmutual Collateral Estoppel in Private Arbitration: Vandenberg v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

Date: Aug 31, 1999
Nonmutual Collateral Estoppel in Private Arbitration: Vandenberg v. Superior Court of Sacramento County Introduction John B. Vandenberg et al. v. The Superior Court of Sacramento County et al. (1999)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert