Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Requiring Prejudice for Vacating Pleas under Penal Code Section 1016.5 Introduction The People v. Zamudio is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, adjudicated on June 5, 2000. This...
Disgorgement into Fluid Recovery Funds Not Permitted in Representative UCL Actions Introduction In the seminal case of Vickey Kraus et al. v. Trinity Management Services Inc., the Supreme Court of...
Lasko Jr. v. The People: Redefining Intent in Voluntary Manslaughter Introduction Lasko Jr. v. The People (23 Cal.4th 101, 2000) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Voluntary Manslaughter in Unintentional Self-Defense: People v. Blakeley Introduction People v. George John Blakeley (23 Cal.4th 82) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
California Supreme Court Establishes Parameters for Unilateral Termination of Employment Policies within Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of CRAIG ASMUS et al. v. PACIFIC BELL et al., the...
Admissibility of Hearsay Statements from Incompetent Minors in Dependency Proceedings: IN RE LUCERO L., 22 Cal.4th 1227 Introduction The case of IN RE LUCERO L., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction in People v. Riel (22 Cal.4th 1153): A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction The case of The People v. Charles Dell Riel, reported as 22 Cal.4th 1153, presents a...
Reversing Time-Barred Second Asbestos Claim: Hamilton v. Asbestos Corporation Introduction Hamilton v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of California...
Affirmation of In-House Counsel’s Right to Recover Attorney Fees Under Civil Code §1717: PLCM Group v. Drexler Introduction The case of PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler (2000) adjudicated by the Supreme...
People v. Jenkins: Upholding Capital Murder Conviction and Procedural Safeguards in High-Stakes Trials Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Daniel Steven Jenkins (22 Cal.4th 900, 2000), the...
Recognition of Psychological Harm in Aggravated Kidnapping: People v. Nguyen Sets New Precedent Introduction People v. Nguyen (22 Cal.4th 872, 2000) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Terry Douglas Bemore v. The People: Establishing Precedent on Torture-Murder and Effective Representation in Capital Cases Introduction Terry Douglas Bemore v. The People (22 Cal.4th 809) is a...
Arbitral Finality and Interpretation of Attorney Fees Clauses: Insights from Moshonov v. Walsh Introduction The case of Robin Moshonov v. John D. Walsh et al., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Martinez v. The People: Clarifying the State and Federal Speedy Trial Rights in California Introduction In Martinez v. The People (22 Cal.4th 750, 2000), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Establishment of Strict Standards for Jury Instructions in Capital Cases: People v. Waidla Introduction People v. Tauno Waidla (22 Cal.4th 690, 2000) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Factual Impossibility Does Not Preclude Conviction Under Prop 187's Section 113 Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Jose Rizo et al., decided by the Supreme Court of California on April...
Full Application of Firearm Use Enhancements in Indeterminate Sentencing: THE PEOPLE v. PATRICK P. FELIX Introduction The landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. PATRICK P. FELIX (22 Cal.4th 651) addressed...
Compulsory Travel Time as Compensable Hours: Morillion v. Royal Packing Company Introduction Morillion v. Royal Packing Company is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Affirmation of Felony-Murder Conviction and Procedural Standards: People v. Sakarias Introduction People v. Peter Sakarias (22 Cal.4th 596, 2000) is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Paz v. State of California: Negligent Undertaking and Duty of Care in Public Safety Projects Introduction The case of Francisco Paz vs. State of California et al. (22 Cal.4th 550) adjudicated by the...