Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Finality of Judgments and Non-Retroactive Refiling: Establishing Precedent in People v. King

Finality of Judgments and Non-Retroactive Refiling: Establishing Precedent in People v. King

Date: Jan 11, 2002
Finality of Judgments and Non-Retroactive Refiling: Establishing Precedent in People v. King Introduction People v. King (27 Cal.4th 29, 2002) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Mooc v. The People: Refining Procedures for Pitchess Motions and Appellate Review

Mooc v. The People: Refining Procedures for Pitchess Motions and Appellate Review

Date: Dec 25, 2001
Mooc v. The People: Refining Procedures for Pitchess Motions and Appellate Review Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. BAU A. MOOC (26 Cal.4th 1216), the Supreme Court of California...
Constructive Notice Through Inspection Failures: Ortega v. Kmart Corporation

Constructive Notice Through Inspection Failures: Ortega v. Kmart Corporation

Date: Dec 21, 2001
Constructive Notice Through Inspection Failures: Ortega v. Kmart Corporation Introduction Ortega v. Kmart Corporation is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court of California rendered on December 20,...
Affirming Death Sentence: Standards for Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct Upheld in People v. Taylor

Affirming Death Sentence: Standards for Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct Upheld in People v. Taylor

Date: Dec 4, 2001
Affirming Death Sentence: Standards for Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct Upheld in People v. Taylor Introduction Case: The People v. Robert Clarence Taylor Court: Supreme Court of California Date:...
NEFF v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. Reaffirmed: Implications for Statute of Limitations in Insurance Claims

NEFF v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. Reaffirmed: Implications for Statute of Limitations in Insurance Claims

Date: Nov 6, 2001
NEFF v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. Reaffirmed: Implications for Statute of Limitations in Insurance Claims Introduction The case of Peter Vu v. Prudential Property Casualty Insurance Company (26 Cal.4th...
PEOPLE v. KIPP: Upholding Evidence Admissibility and Capital Sentencing Standards in California

PEOPLE v. KIPP: Upholding Evidence Admissibility and Capital Sentencing Standards in California

Date: Nov 2, 2001
PEOPLE v. KIPP: Upholding Evidence Admissibility and Capital Sentencing Standards in California Introduction People v. Martin James Kipp is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Intent to Injure Required for Coemployee Suits: Torres v. Parkhouse Tireservice, Inc.

Intent to Injure Required for Coemployee Suits: Torres v. Parkhouse Tireservice, Inc.

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Intent to Injure Required for Coemployee Suits: Torres v. Parkhouse Tireservice, Inc. Introduction Torres v. Parkhouse Tireservice, Inc. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
People v. Sanchez (2001): Affirming Concurrent Causation in First-Degree Murder

People v. Sanchez (2001): Affirming Concurrent Causation in First-Degree Murder

Date: Aug 28, 2001
People v. Sanchez (2001): Affirming Concurrent Causation in First-Degree Murder Introduction People v. Sanchez (26 Cal.4th 834, 2001) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Limits of Provocative Act Murder Liability: Analysis of People v. Israel Cervantes

Limits of Provocative Act Murder Liability: Analysis of People v. Israel Cervantes

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Limits of Provocative Act Murder Liability: Analysis of People v. Israel Cervantes Introduction Overview of the Case The People v. Israel Cervantes is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Expanding the Continuing Violation Doctrine: Richards v. CH2M HILL and its Impact on FEHA Compliance

Expanding the Continuing Violation Doctrine: Richards v. CH2M HILL and its Impact on FEHA Compliance

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Expanding the Continuing Violation Doctrine: Richards v. CH2M HILL and its Impact on FEHA Compliance Introduction Richard R. WERDEGAR, J. authored the majority opinion in LACHI DELISA RICHARDS,...
Assault as a General Intent Crime: Clarification of Mental State in PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Assault as a General Intent Crime: Clarification of Mental State in PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Assault as a General Intent Crime: Clarification of Mental State in PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS Introduction People v. Lebarron Keith Williams (26 Cal.4th 779, 2001) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Reaffirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Weaver: Legal Principles and Implications

Reaffirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Weaver: Legal Principles and Implications

Date: Aug 21, 2001
Reaffirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Weaver: Legal Principles and Implications Introduction People v. Ward Francis Weaver, Jr. (26 Cal.4th 876) stands as a significant Supreme Court of...
Interpretation of "Illegal Act" Exclusion in Homeowner's Insurance Policies: Safeco v. Robert S.

Interpretation of "Illegal Act" Exclusion in Homeowner's Insurance Policies: Safeco v. Robert S.

Date: Aug 21, 2001
Interpretation of "Illegal Act" Exclusion in Homeowner's Insurance Policies: Safeco v. Robert S. Introduction In the landmark case of Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Robert S. et al. (2001),...
RENEE J. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY: Clarifying Reunification Services Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 361.5

RENEE J. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY: Clarifying Reunification Services Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 361.5

Date: Aug 17, 2001
RENEE J. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY: Clarifying Reunification Services Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 361.5 Introduction The case of RENEE J. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY...
Duty of Reasonable Care in Highway Traffic Stops: An Analysis of CECELIO LUGTU v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL

Duty of Reasonable Care in Highway Traffic Stops: An Analysis of CECELIO LUGTU v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL

Date: Aug 17, 2001
Duty of Reasonable Care in Highway Traffic Stops: An Analysis of CECELIO LUGTU v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Introduction The case of CEC Elio Lugtou et al. v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL et al. (26...
Ownership of Attorney Fees Under FEHA: Flannery v. Prentice Establishes Attorneys’ Rights in Absence of Contract

Ownership of Attorney Fees Under FEHA: Flannery v. Prentice Establishes Attorneys’ Rights in Absence of Contract

Date: Aug 14, 2001
Ownership of Attorney Fees Under FEHA: Flannery v. Prentice Establishes Attorneys’ Rights in Absence of Contract Introduction In the landmark case of Leslie Flannery v. John F. Prentice et al., the...
School Officials' Authority to Detain Students Without Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from IN RE RANDY G.

School Officials' Authority to Detain Students Without Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from IN RE RANDY G.

Date: Aug 14, 2001
School Officials' Authority to Detain Students Without Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from IN RE RANDY G. Introduction The IN RE RANDY G. case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Reaffirmation of Felony-Murder Rule and Capital Sentencing Standards in People v. Seaton

Reaffirmation of Felony-Murder Rule and Capital Sentencing Standards in People v. Seaton

Date: Aug 10, 2001
Reaffirmation of Felony-Murder Rule and Capital Sentencing Standards in People v. Seaton Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case The People v. Ronald Harold Seaton,...
Conservatorship and Life-Sustaining Treatment: Establishing Clear Evidentiary Standards in Wendland v. Conservatorship of Robert Wendland

Conservatorship and Life-Sustaining Treatment: Establishing Clear Evidentiary Standards in Wendland v. Conservatorship of Robert Wendland

Date: Aug 10, 2001
Conservatorship and Life-Sustaining Treatment: Establishing Clear Evidentiary Standards in Wendland v. Conservatorship of Robert Wendland Introduction Wendland v. Conservatorship of Robert Wendland...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. OCHOA: An Analysis of Aggravating Circumstances and Procedural Safeguards

Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. OCHOA: An Analysis of Aggravating Circumstances and Procedural Safeguards

Date: Aug 7, 2001
Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. OCHOA: An Analysis of Aggravating Circumstances and Procedural Safeguards Introduction Case Citation: People v. Sergio Ochoa, 26 Cal.4th 398 (2001) The...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert