Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Supreme Court of California Reinforces Firearm Manufacturer Immunity Under Civil Code §1714.4: MERRILL v. NAVEGAR, INC.

Supreme Court of California Reinforces Firearm Manufacturer Immunity Under Civil Code §1714.4: MERRILL v. NAVEGAR, INC.

Date: Aug 7, 2001
Supreme Court of California Reinforces Firearm Manufacturer Immunity Under Civil Code §1714.4: MERRILL v. NAVEGAR, INC. Introduction In the landmark case of Marilyn Merrill et al. v. Navegar, Inc....
Ensuring Voluntariness: Collins v. The People and the Integrity of Jury Waivers

Ensuring Voluntariness: Collins v. The People and the Integrity of Jury Waivers

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Ensuring Voluntariness: Collins v. The People and the Integrity of Jury Waivers Introduction In The People v. Damani Collins (26 Cal.4th 297, 2001), the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
Upholding Death Penalty in the Presence of Impaired Witness Credibility: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RAYMOND ANTHONY LEWIS

Upholding Death Penalty in the Presence of Impaired Witness Credibility: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RAYMOND ANTHONY LEWIS

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Upholding Death Penalty in the Presence of Impaired Witness Credibility: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RAYMOND ANTHONY LEWIS Introduction In THE PEOPLE v. RAYMOND ANTHONY LEWIS (26 Cal.4th 334, 2001),...
Enhancement of Gang-Related Penalties Under the STEP Act: Insights from People v. Say Sengpadychith

Enhancement of Gang-Related Penalties Under the STEP Act: Insights from People v. Say Sengpadychith

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Enhancement of Gang-Related Penalties Under the STEP Act: Insights from People v. Say Sengpadychith Introduction People v. Say Sengpadychith is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of California...
RRL Corp. v. Donovan: Unilateral Mistake and Contract Rescission in Vehicle Sales Advertisements

RRL Corp. v. Donovan: Unilateral Mistake and Contract Rescission in Vehicle Sales Advertisements

Date: Jul 31, 2001
RRL Corp. v. Donovan: Unilateral Mistake and Contract Rescission in Vehicle Sales Advertisements Introduction In RRL Corporation v. Donovan, the Supreme Court of California addressed pivotal issues...
MONTENEGRO v. DIAZ: Affirming the Best Interest Standard Over Changed Circumstances in Custody Modifications

MONTENEGRO v. DIAZ: Affirming the Best Interest Standard Over Changed Circumstances in Custody Modifications

Date: Jul 31, 2001
MONTENEGRO v. DIAZ: Affirming the Best Interest Standard Over Changed Circumstances in Custody Modifications Introduction MONTENEGRO v. DIAZ (26 Cal.4th 249) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Precedent on Prior-Murder Special Circumstances: PEOPLE v. TREVINO

Precedent on Prior-Murder Special Circumstances: PEOPLE v. TREVINO

Date: Jul 27, 2001
Precedent on Prior-Murder Special Circumstances: PEOPLE v. TREVINO Introduction PEOPLE v. TREVINO is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California rendered on July 26, 2001. The case...
Admissibility of Multiple Hearsay in SVP Proceedings: Analysis of The People v. Jimmie Dale Otto

Admissibility of Multiple Hearsay in SVP Proceedings: Analysis of The People v. Jimmie Dale Otto

Date: Jul 24, 2001
Admissibility of Multiple Hearsay in SVP Proceedings: Analysis of The People v. Jimmie Dale Otto Introduction The People v. Jimmie Dale Otto is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing the Offense of Attempted Criminal Threat: Analysis of PEOPLE v. TOLEDO

Establishing the Offense of Attempted Criminal Threat: Analysis of PEOPLE v. TOLEDO

Date: Jul 24, 2001
Establishing the Offense of Attempted Criminal Threat: Analysis of PEOPLE v. TOLEDO Introduction People v. Ryan Patrick Toledo, 26 Cal.4th 221 (2001), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Appellate Courts' Inherent Authority to Correct Abstracts of Judgment: Insights from The People v. Willie Ross Mitchell

Appellate Courts' Inherent Authority to Correct Abstracts of Judgment: Insights from The People v. Willie Ross Mitchell

Date: Jul 20, 2001
Appellate Courts' Inherent Authority to Correct Abstracts of Judgment: Insights from The People v. Willie Ross Mitchell Introduction The People v. Willie Ross Mitchell (26 Cal.4th 181) is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Double Murder Conviction by Administration of Paraquat Poison: Legal Reasoning and Precedents

Affirmation of Double Murder Conviction by Administration of Paraquat Poison: Legal Reasoning and Precedents

Date: Jul 17, 2001
Affirmation of Double Murder Conviction by Administration of Paraquat Poison: Legal Reasoning and Precedents Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Steven David...
Design Immunity and Jury Trial Rights: Insights from STACY CORNETTE v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Design Immunity and Jury Trial Rights: Insights from STACY CORNETTE v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Design Immunity and Jury Trial Rights: Insights from STACY CORNETTE v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Introduction In the landmark case of Stacy Cornette et al. v. Department of Transportation, the...
Defensive Claims under California's Talent Agencies Act Must Be Submitted to the Labor Commissioner: Analysis of Norton Styne v. Connie Stevens

Defensive Claims under California's Talent Agencies Act Must Be Submitted to the Labor Commissioner: Analysis of Norton Styne v. Connie Stevens

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Defensive Claims under California's Talent Agencies Act Must Be Submitted to the Labor Commissioner: Analysis of Norton Styne v. Connie Stevens Introduction The legal landscape governing talent...
Recalculating Custody Credits on Sentencing Remand: Insights from People v. Joe Buckhalter

Recalculating Custody Credits on Sentencing Remand: Insights from People v. Joe Buckhalter

Date: Jul 10, 2001
Recalculating Custody Credits on Sentencing Remand: Insights from People v. Joe Buckhalter Introduction In People v. Joe Buckhalter, 26 Cal.4th 20 (2001), the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Sanctions for Non-Appearance: Insights from People v. Masloski

Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Sanctions for Non-Appearance: Insights from People v. Masloski

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Sanctions for Non-Appearance: Insights from People v. Masloski Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Linda Jean Masloski, Defendant and...
Use of Vacated Out-of-State Convictions in SVPA Proceedings: The People v. Eddie Vasquez

Use of Vacated Out-of-State Convictions in SVPA Proceedings: The People v. Eddie Vasquez

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Use of Vacated Out-of-State Convictions in SVPA Proceedings: The People v. Eddie Vasquez Introduction The People v. Eddie Vasquez (25 Cal.4th 1225) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Independent Contractors' Employees Barred from Negligent Hiring Actions Against Hirers: California Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Independent Contractors' Employees Barred from Negligent Hiring Actions Against Hirers: California Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Independent Contractors' Employees Barred from Negligent Hiring Actions Against Hirers: California Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case EVA CAMARGO et al. v....
People v. Martin: Limiting the Mijares Defense to Momentary Transitory Possession for Disposal

People v. Martin: Limiting the Mijares Defense to Momentary Transitory Possession for Disposal

Date: Jul 3, 2001
People v. Martin: Limiting the Mijares Defense to Momentary Transitory Possession for Disposal Introduction In People v. Robert Louis Martin (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1180, the Supreme Court of California...
Exoneration by Postconviction Relief as a Prerequisite in Criminal Legal Malpractice Claims: Analysis of COSCIA v. McKENNA Cuneo

Exoneration by Postconviction Relief as a Prerequisite in Criminal Legal Malpractice Claims: Analysis of COSCIA v. McKENNA Cuneo

Date: Jul 3, 2001
Exoneration by Postconviction Relief as a Prerequisite in Criminal Legal Malpractice Claims: Analysis of COSCIA v. McKENNA Cuneo Introduction The landmark case NICHOLAS F. COSCIA, Plaintiff and...
Jury Unanimity Requirements in Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from PEOPLE v. RUSSO

Jury Unanimity Requirements in Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from PEOPLE v. RUSSO

Date: Jun 29, 2001
Jury Unanimity Requirements in Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from PEOPLE v. RUSSO Introduction People v. Susan Lee Russo is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of California on June 28,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert