Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Impartiality in Administrative Hearings: Precedent on Financial Interests from HAAS v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Impartiality in Administrative Hearings: Precedent on Financial Interests from HAAS v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Date: May 7, 2002
Impartiality in Administrative Hearings: Precedent on Financial Interests from HAAS v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Introduction Theodore L. HAAS v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO et al. is a landmark decision...
Kasky v. Nike: Defining Commercial Speech in Consumer Protection

Kasky v. Nike: Defining Commercial Speech in Consumer Protection

Date: May 3, 2002
Kasky v. Nike: Defining Commercial Speech in Consumer Protection Introduction In KASKY v. NIKE, INC. (2002), the Supreme Court of California addressed a pivotal issue concerning the distinction...
Reaffirming Evaluator Concurrence in SVPA Recommitment Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Ghilotti

Reaffirming Evaluator Concurrence in SVPA Recommitment Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Ghilotti

Date: Apr 26, 2002
Reaffirming Evaluator Concurrence in SVPA Recommitment Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Ghilotti Introduction The landmark case of The People, Petitioner, v. The Superior Court of...
Affirmation of Juvenile Court's Authority in Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In re Angel B.

Affirmation of Juvenile Court's Authority in Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In re Angel B.

Date: Apr 5, 2002
Affirmation of Juvenile Court's Authority in Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In re Angel B. Introduction The case of In re Angel B. (97 Cal.App.4th 454) addresses critical issues...
California Supreme Court Reaffirms Criminal Negligence Standard for Felony Child Endangerment under Penal Code §273a(a)

California Supreme Court Reaffirms Criminal Negligence Standard for Felony Child Endangerment under Penal Code §273a(a)

Date: Mar 29, 2002
California Supreme Court Reaffirms Criminal Negligence Standard for Felony Child Endangerment under Penal Code §273a(a) Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Eva Valdez (27 Cal.4th 778),...
Enforceability of Waivers under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act

Enforceability of Waivers under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act

Date: Mar 29, 2002
Enforceability of Waivers under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act Introduction In the landmark case The County of Riverside v. The Superior Court of Riverside County (27...
Defining 'Confidential Communication' under California's Invasion of Privacy Act: FLANAGAN v. FLANAGAN Establishes Frio Standard

Defining 'Confidential Communication' under California's Invasion of Privacy Act: FLANAGAN v. FLANAGAN Establishes Frio Standard

Date: Mar 15, 2002
Defining 'Confidential Communication' under California's Invasion of Privacy Act: FLANAGAN v. FLANAGAN Establishes Frio Standard Introduction FLANAGAN v. FLANAGAN is a pivotal decision by the Supreme...
Enhancement Sentencing Under Section 667.61: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. MANCEBO

Enhancement Sentencing Under Section 667.61: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. MANCEBO

Date: Mar 12, 2002
Enhancement Sentencing Under Section 667.61: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. MANCEBO Introduction People v. Chad Melvin Mancebo, 27 Cal.4th 735 (2002), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Escrow Holder's Limited Duty of Care to Non-Parties: An Analysis of SUMMIT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS v. CONTINENTAL Lawyers Title Company

Escrow Holder's Limited Duty of Care to Non-Parties: An Analysis of SUMMIT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS v. CONTINENTAL Lawyers Title Company

Date: Mar 8, 2002
Escrow Holder's Limited Duty of Care to Non-Parties: An Analysis of SUMMIT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS v. CONTINENTAL Lawyers Title Company Introduction Summit Financial Holdings, Ltd. v. Continental Lawyers...
Affirming Custodial Arrests for Minor Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. McKAY

Affirming Custodial Arrests for Minor Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. McKAY

Date: Mar 5, 2002
Affirming Custodial Arrests for Minor Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. McKAY Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Conrad Richard McKay (27 Cal.4th 601, 2002), the Supreme Court of...
Prosecutorial Discretion in Charging Minors: Upholding Separation of Powers and Constitutional Protections in MORGAN v. Superior Court

Prosecutorial Discretion in Charging Minors: Upholding Separation of Powers and Constitutional Protections in MORGAN v. Superior Court

Date: Mar 1, 2002
Prosecutorial Discretion in Charging Minors: Upholding Separation of Powers and Constitutional Protections in Morgan v. Superior Court Introduction Morgan v. Superior Court is a landmark decision by...
Mutual Mistake in Release Agreements and Limitations on Prejudgment Interest: Insights from Hess v. Ford Motor Co.

Mutual Mistake in Release Agreements and Limitations on Prejudgment Interest: Insights from Hess v. Ford Motor Co.

Date: Mar 1, 2002
Mutual Mistake in Release Agreements and Limitations on Prejudgment Interest: Insights from Hess v. Ford Motor Co. Introduction John Hess, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant and...
California Supreme Court Refines Standards for Kidnapping-Related Charges in Murder Cases: People v. Danny Ray Hillhouse

California Supreme Court Refines Standards for Kidnapping-Related Charges in Murder Cases: People v. Danny Ray Hillhouse

Date: Feb 26, 2002
California Supreme Court Refines Standards for Kidnapping-Related Charges in Murder Cases: People v. Danny Ray Hillhouse Introduction The case of People v. Danny Ray Hillhouse (27 Cal.4th 469)...
Abandonment Theory of Liability Not Applicable Against Public Entities in California Construction Contracts

Abandonment Theory of Liability Not Applicable Against Public Entities in California Construction Contracts

Date: Feb 5, 2002
Abandonment Theory of Liability Not Applicable Against Public Entities in California Construction Contracts Introduction The case of Amelco Electric, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. City of Thousand...
Affirmative Contribution Required for Hirer Liability: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hooker v. Department of Transportation

Affirmative Contribution Required for Hirer Liability: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hooker v. Department of Transportation

Date: Feb 1, 2002
Affirmative Contribution Required for Hirer Liability: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hooker v. Department of Transportation Introduction The case of Roseanne Hooker v. Department of Transportation...
Affirmation of Death Sentencing in People v. Hughes: Analysis of Special Circumstances and Procedural Due Process

Affirmation of Death Sentencing in People v. Hughes: Analysis of Special Circumstances and Procedural Due Process

Date: Jan 29, 2002
Affirmation of Death Sentencing in People v. Hughes: Analysis of Special Circumstances and Procedural Due Process Introduction The case of People v. Kristin William Hughes (27 Cal.4th 287) presents a...
Permissible Warrantless Vehicle Searches for Identification Documents During Traffic Stops

Permissible Warrantless Vehicle Searches for Identification Documents During Traffic Stops

Date: Jan 25, 2002
Permissible Warrantless Vehicle Searches for Identification Documents During Traffic Stops Introduction The California Supreme Court's decision in IN RE ARTURO D. and People v. Hinger (2002)...
Limits on the Death Penalty for Conspiracy to Commit Murder: People v. Lawley

Limits on the Death Penalty for Conspiracy to Commit Murder: People v. Lawley

Date: Jan 25, 2002
Limits on the Death Penalty for Conspiracy to Commit Murder: People v. Lawley Introduction People v. Dennis Harold Lawley, 27 Cal.4th 102 (2002), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Extended Temporary Deprivation Suffices for Theft Under California Law: PEOPLE v. AVERY

Extended Temporary Deprivation Suffices for Theft Under California Law: PEOPLE v. AVERY

Date: Jan 18, 2002
Intent to Extend Deprivation Suffices for Theft Under California Law: PEOPLE v. AVERY Introduction People v. Robert Derwin Avery is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, delivered...
Limitation of Presentence Conduct Credits for Murder Convictions under Section 2933.1

Limitation of Presentence Conduct Credits for Murder Convictions under Section 2933.1

Date: Jan 15, 2002
Limitation of Presentence Conduct Credits for Murder Convictions under Section 2933.1 Introduction The case of The People v. Bruce Edward Cooper (27 Cal.4th 38, 2002) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert