Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
THE PEOPLE v. KURT MICHAELS (28 Cal.4th 486): Upholding Admissibility of Confessions and Special Circumstances in the Death Penalty Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Kurt Michaels...
Limiting Public Agencies' Access to Declaratory Relief under the California Public Records Act Introduction In Steve A. FILARSKY v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, the Supreme Court of...
California Supreme Court Expands Application of PC 1203.044 to Theft of Trade Secrets and Non-Monetary Property Introduction The People v. Alejandro Farell, 28 Cal.4th 381 (2002), is a landmark...
Eligibility of Attorney Fees for Indigent Employees Represented by Public Entities: LOLLEY v. CAMPBELL Introduction LOLLEY v. CAMPBELL is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Reaffirming the Harmless Error Standard in Self-Representation Cases: PEOPLE v. CRAYTON Introduction PEOPLE v. CRAYTON (28 Cal.4th 346, 2002) is a pivotal case from the Supreme Court of California...
Transferring Intent and Proximate Causation in Criminal Law: Analysis of People v. Bland Introduction Case: The People v. Jomo K. Bland (28 Cal.4th 313) | Court: Supreme Court of California | Date:...
Interpretation of Penal Code Section 288.5(c): Clarifying Conjunctive Convictions in Continuous Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction Case Name: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Lonnie Johnson,...
Relief from Voluntary Section 998 Settlements Due to Clerical Errors under Section 473(b) Introduction The case of Capablo Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc. addresses a critical issue in...
Expansive Interpretation of Spousal Testimony Privilege Exception under Evidence Code §972(e)(2) Introduction The case of The People v. Robert Gene Sinohui (28 Cal.4th 205) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in THE PEOPLE v. JACK GUS FARNAM: Upholding Procedural Fairness in Capital Sentencing Introduction THE PEOPLE v. JACK GUS FARNAM (28 Cal.4th 107, 2002) is a significant...
Refining Fiduciary Disqualification: Understanding Section 21350(a)(4) in Rice v. Clark Introduction In Owen S. Rice v. Richard L. Clark et al., 28 Cal.4th 89 (2002), the Supreme Court of California...
Presumed Fatherhood Affirmed Despite Non-Biological Paternity Admission in IN RE NICHOLAS H. Introduction The landmark decision in IN RE NICHOLAS H. (28 Cal.4th 56) addresses a critical issue in...
Defining 'Entry' in Burglary: Window Screen Penetration Constitutes Building Entry Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Cuahutemoc Sanchez Valencia, Defendant and Appellant....
Exclusionary Rule Enforced Over Good Faith Exception in Warrantless Parole-Based Search: People v. Willis Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Gary Wayne Willis (28 Cal.4th 22, 2002), the...
Assessing Harmless Errors in California Death Penalty Sentencing: A Commentary on People v. Slaughter Introduction People v. Michael Corey Slaughter (27 Cal.4th 1187) is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Admissibility of Prior Convictions and Juror Conduct in Capital Cases: People v. Steele Introduction People v. Raymond Edward Steele, 27 Cal.4th 1230 (2002), is a landmark judgment by the Supreme...
Mandatory Imposition of State and County Penalties for Cocaine Possession: Analysis of PEOPLE v. TALIBDEEN Introduction PEOPLE v. TALIBDEEN (27 Cal.4th 1151, 2002) is a pivotal Supreme Court of...
Abrogation of the Corpus Delicti Rule by Proposition 8 in People v. Jose M. Alvarez Introduction People v. Jose M. Alvarez is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that addresses the...
Government Immunity under Gov. Code §845 Affirmed in Courthouse Security Negligence Case Introduction The case of DANA E. ZELIG, a Minor, et al. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al. presents a pivotal...
Koontz v. People: Upholding the Rights to Self-Representation and Challenging Incompetency Claims Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Herbert Harris Koontz, decided by the Supreme...