Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Reinforcing the Predatory Act Requirement: California's SVPA Commitments Under Scrutiny Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Richard Hurtado (28 Cal.4th 1179, 2002), the California...
Expanding Vicarious Liability under Penal Code Section 12022.53: The CATHE PEOPLE v. ARTURO GARCIA Decision Introduction The case of CATHE PEOPLE v. ARTURO GARCIA revolves around the application of...
Reaffirmation of the Duran Standard: Use of Remote-Controlled Stun Belts in Courtrooms Introduction In the landmark case The People v. James Allen Mar, the Supreme Court of California grappled with...
Waiver of Custody Credits under Penal Code Section 2900.5: Insights from The PEOPLE v. JOHNSON Introduction The People v. Dale Howard Johnson (28 Cal.4th 1050, 2002) is a pivotal case in California's...
Establishing Rights Under Lost Insurance Policies: Comprehensive Analysis of DART INDUSTRIES, INC. v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSurance Company Introduction DART INDUSTRIES, INC. v. COMMERCIAL UNION...
Clarifying the Break-in-Custody Exception to the Edwards No-Recontact Rule: PEOPLE v. STORM Introduction People v. Charles Edward Storm, 28 Cal.4th 1007 (2002), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Gutierrez v. The People (2002): Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Application of Felony Murder and Special Circumstance Principles Introduction Gutierrez v. The People is a landmark case...
Interplay of the Three Strikes and One Strike Laws: Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. ACOSTA Introduction In the landmark case PEOPLE v. ACOSTA (2002), the Supreme Court of California addressed the...
Defining "Relative" in Child Molestation Sentencing: Insights from The People v. James Bert Wutzke Introduction The People v. James Bert Wutzke (28 Cal.4th 923) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Evaluating Peremptory Challenges in Capital Cases: People v. McDermott Introduction People v. McDermott is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of California on August 12, 2002. The case...
Appealability of Post-Judgment Motions to Vacate under Penal Code 1016.5: People v. Totari Introduction In People v. Zuheir Anis Totari, 28 Cal.4th 876 (2002), the Supreme Court of California...
Res Judicata and Declaratory Judgments: Insights from Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co. Introduction Mycogen Corporation et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants v. Monsanto Company, Defendant and Respondent is...
Myers v. Philip Morris: Repeal Statute and Its Implications on Tobacco Liability 28 Cal.4th 828, Supreme Court of California, August 5, 2002 Introduction Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. is a...
Probable Cause Established by Denial of Anti-SLAPP Motion: WILSON v. PARKER Introduction The case of Raul Wilson et al. v. Parker, Covert Chidester et al. (28 Cal.4th 811, 2002) presents a pivotal...
Duress Defense Excluded in California Murder Cases: Analysis of PEOPLE v. ANDERSON Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Robert Neal Anderson, Defendant and Appellant. Court:...
Impact of Prejudicial Error in Death Qualification Voir Dire: A Commentary on People v. Randall Scott Cash (28 Cal.4th 703) Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Randall Scott Cash,...
Authorized Appellate Review of Misdemeanor Sentencing in Wobbler Offenses Established in PEOPLE v. STATUM Introduction In The People v. Russell Hubert Statum (2002) 28 Cal.4th 682, the Supreme Court...
Balancing Attorney-Client and Psychotherapist-Patient Privileges in Confrontation Rights: People v. Gurule Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff...
Limitations on Jury Instructions: Reining in CALJIC No. 17.41.1 Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Tye John Engelman, the Supreme Court of California addressed the contentious issue...
Limited Immunity Under Proposition 215: Insights from PEOPLE v. MOWER Introduction The case of People v. Myron Carlyle Mower (28 Cal.4th 457) represents a pivotal moment in California's legal...