Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Habeas Corpus: In re James Robert Scott

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Habeas Corpus: In re James Robert Scott

Date: Jan 28, 2003
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Habeas Corpus: In re James Robert Scott Introduction In the landmark case of In re James Robert Scott on Habeas Corpus (29 Cal.4th 783, 2003), the Supreme...
Judicial Review of Gubernatorial Parole Decisions: In re Robert Rosenkrantz

Judicial Review of Gubernatorial Parole Decisions: In re Robert Rosenkrantz

Date: Dec 17, 2002
Judicial Review of Gubernatorial Parole Decisions: In re Robert Rosenkrantz Introduction In re Robert Rosenkrantz, on Habeas Corpus (29 Cal.4th 616, 2002) addresses critical questions surrounding the...
The Quantum of Force in Kidnapping of Unresisting Infants: IN RE MICHELE D. Commentary

The Quantum of Force in Kidnapping of Unresisting Infants: IN RE MICHELE D. Commentary

Date: Dec 17, 2002
The Quantum of Force in Kidnapping of Unresisting Infants: IN RE MICHELE D. Commentary Introduction The case of IN RE MICHELE D. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 600 marks a significant precedent in California law...
Enhancement of Sentencing Under Section 12022.1 for Failure to Appear Confirmed

Enhancement of Sentencing Under Section 12022.1 for Failure to Appear Confirmed

Date: Dec 13, 2002
Enhancement of Sentencing Under Section 12022.1 for Failure to Appear Confirmed Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Daniel Walker, 29 Cal.4th 577 (2002), the Supreme Court of...
The People v. Clifford Stanley Bolden: Establishing the Standards for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances

The People v. Clifford Stanley Bolden: Establishing the Standards for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances

Date: Dec 6, 2002
The People v. Clifford Stanley Bolden: Establishing the Standards for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances Introduction The People v. Clifford Stanley Bolden is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Strict Product Liability Extended to Component Manufacturers in Mass-Produced Homes: Analysis of Filipina JIMENEZ v. SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County

Strict Product Liability Extended to Component Manufacturers in Mass-Produced Homes: Analysis of Filipina JIMENEZ v. SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County

Date: Dec 5, 2002
Strict Product Liability Extended to Component Manufacturers in Mass-Produced Homes: Analysis of Filipina JIMENEZ v. SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County Introduction Filipina Jimenez et al. v. The...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Boyette: Standards for Voluntary Confessions and Peremptory Challenges

Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Boyette: Standards for Voluntary Confessions and Peremptory Challenges

Date: Dec 3, 2002
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Boyette: Standards for Voluntary Confessions and Peremptory Challenges Introduction People v. Maurice Boyette, 29 Cal.4th 381 (2002), is a significant...
Success in Appeals Determines Fee-Shifting: SMITH v. RAE-VENTER LAW GROUP

Success in Appeals Determines Fee-Shifting: SMITH v. RAE-VENTER LAW GROUP

Date: Dec 3, 2002
Success in Appeals Determines Fee-Shifting: SMITH v. RAE-VENTER LAW GROUP Introduction The landmark decision in SMITH v. RAE-VENTER LAW GROUP (29 Cal.4th 345, 2002) by the Supreme Court of California...
Katzberg v. Regents of University of California: Limiting Damages for Constitutional Violations in California Law

Katzberg v. Regents of University of California: Limiting Damages for Constitutional Violations in California Law

Date: Nov 28, 2002
Katzberg v. Regents of University of California: Limiting Damages for Constitutional Violations in California Law Introduction Katzberg v. Regents of University of California is a landmark decision...
Revisiting Probable Cause Standards under the Sexually Violent Predators Act: Insights from Cooley v. Superior Court

Revisiting Probable Cause Standards under the Sexually Violent Predators Act: Insights from Cooley v. Superior Court

Date: Nov 26, 2002
Revisiting Probable Cause Standards under the Sexually Violent Predators Act: Insights from Cooley v. Superior Court Introduction Cooley v. Superior Court is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Passive Internet Activity Insufficient for Personal Jurisdiction: PAVLOVICH v. SUPERIOR COURT

Passive Internet Activity Insufficient for Personal Jurisdiction: PAVLOVICH v. SUPERIOR COURT

Date: Nov 26, 2002
Passive Internet Activity Insufficient for Personal Jurisdiction: PAVLOVICH v. SUPERIOR COURT Introduction The case of Matthew Pavlovich v. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County addresses the...
Extending Appellate Counsel Rights in Termination of Parental Rights: In Re J. W. Case Analysis

Extending Appellate Counsel Rights in Termination of Parental Rights: In Re J. W. Case Analysis

Date: Nov 15, 2002
Extending Appellate Counsel Rights in Termination of Parental Rights: In Re J. W. Case Analysis Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in In Re J. W., a Minor, Walter W., Petitioner...
Setoff Claims Under California Civil Procedure: CPS v. TIG Insurance Analysis

Setoff Claims Under California Civil Procedure: CPS v. TIG Insurance Analysis

Date: Nov 15, 2002
Setoff Claims Under California Civil Procedure: CPS v. TIG Insurance Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of Construction Protective Services, Inc. v. TIG Specialty Insurance Company, the...
Strict Enforcement of Rule 2-200: Mandating Written Client Consent for Attorney Fee Divisions

Strict Enforcement of Rule 2-200: Mandating Written Client Consent for Attorney Fee Divisions

Date: Nov 5, 2002
Strict Enforcement of Rule 2-200: Mandating Written Client Consent for Attorney Fee Divisions Introduction The case of Arthur Chambers v. Philip Kay (2002) serves as a pivotal decision by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Parental Rights Termination under Section 366.26(c)(1): Clarifying the Sibling Relationship Exception

Affirmation of Parental Rights Termination under Section 366.26(c)(1): Clarifying the Sibling Relationship Exception

Date: Sep 5, 2002
Affirmation of Parental Rights Termination under Section 366.26(c)(1): Clarifying the Sibling Relationship Exception Introduction The case In re L.Y.L., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law...
Defining 'Arising From' in Anti-SLAPP Context: Insights from CITY OF COTATI v. CASHMAN

Defining 'Arising From' in Anti-SLAPP Context: Insights from CITY OF COTATI v. CASHMAN

Date: Aug 30, 2002
Defining 'Arising From' in Anti-SLAPP Context: Insights from CITY OF COTATI v. CASHMAN Introduction In the landmark case of City of Cotati, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Gene Cashman et al., Defendants...
California Supreme Court Establishes Objective Standard for Anti-SLAPP Motions

California Supreme Court Establishes Objective Standard for Anti-SLAPP Motions

Date: Aug 30, 2002
California Supreme Court Establishes Objective Standard for Anti-SLAPP Motions Introduction In the landmark case Equilon Enterprises, LLC v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (29 Cal.4th 53, 2002), the Supreme...
NAVELLIER v. SLETTEN: Expanding Anti-SLAPP Protections to Include Contract and Fraud Claims

NAVELLIER v. SLETTEN: Expanding Anti-SLAPP Protections to Include Contract and Fraud Claims

Date: Aug 30, 2002
NAVELLIER v. SLETTEN: Expanding Anti-SLAPP Protections to Include Contract and Fraud Claims 1. Introduction In the landmark case of NAVELLIER v. SLETTEN (29 Cal.4th 82, 2002), the Supreme Court of...
Brady Compliance with Five-Year Discovery Limit: Analysis of CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County

Brady Compliance with Five-Year Discovery Limit: Analysis of CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County

Date: Aug 27, 2002
Brady Compliance with Five-Year Discovery Limit: Analysis of CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County Introduction The case of CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles...
Establishing the Reasonable Range for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: In re JESSE JAMES ANDREWS

Establishing the Reasonable Range for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: In re JESSE JAMES ANDREWS

Date: Aug 27, 2002
Establishing the Reasonable Range for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: In re JESSE JAMES ANDREWS Introduction The case of In re JESSE JAMES ANDREWS on Habeas Corpus (28 Cal.4th...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert