Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Habeas Corpus: In re James Robert Scott Introduction In the landmark case of In re James Robert Scott on Habeas Corpus (29 Cal.4th 783, 2003), the Supreme...
Judicial Review of Gubernatorial Parole Decisions: In re Robert Rosenkrantz Introduction In re Robert Rosenkrantz, on Habeas Corpus (29 Cal.4th 616, 2002) addresses critical questions surrounding the...
The Quantum of Force in Kidnapping of Unresisting Infants: IN RE MICHELE D. Commentary Introduction The case of IN RE MICHELE D. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 600 marks a significant precedent in California law...
Enhancement of Sentencing Under Section 12022.1 for Failure to Appear Confirmed Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Daniel Walker, 29 Cal.4th 577 (2002), the Supreme Court of...
The People v. Clifford Stanley Bolden: Establishing the Standards for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances Introduction The People v. Clifford Stanley Bolden is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Strict Product Liability Extended to Component Manufacturers in Mass-Produced Homes: Analysis of Filipina JIMENEZ v. SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County Introduction Filipina Jimenez et al. v. The...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Boyette: Standards for Voluntary Confessions and Peremptory Challenges Introduction People v. Maurice Boyette, 29 Cal.4th 381 (2002), is a significant...
Success in Appeals Determines Fee-Shifting: SMITH v. RAE-VENTER LAW GROUP Introduction The landmark decision in SMITH v. RAE-VENTER LAW GROUP (29 Cal.4th 345, 2002) by the Supreme Court of California...
Katzberg v. Regents of University of California: Limiting Damages for Constitutional Violations in California Law Introduction Katzberg v. Regents of University of California is a landmark decision...
Revisiting Probable Cause Standards under the Sexually Violent Predators Act: Insights from Cooley v. Superior Court Introduction Cooley v. Superior Court is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Passive Internet Activity Insufficient for Personal Jurisdiction: PAVLOVICH v. SUPERIOR COURT Introduction The case of Matthew Pavlovich v. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County addresses the...
Extending Appellate Counsel Rights in Termination of Parental Rights: In Re J. W. Case Analysis Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in In Re J. W., a Minor, Walter W., Petitioner...
Setoff Claims Under California Civil Procedure: CPS v. TIG Insurance Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of Construction Protective Services, Inc. v. TIG Specialty Insurance Company, the...
Strict Enforcement of Rule 2-200: Mandating Written Client Consent for Attorney Fee Divisions Introduction The case of Arthur Chambers v. Philip Kay (2002) serves as a pivotal decision by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Parental Rights Termination under Section 366.26(c)(1): Clarifying the Sibling Relationship Exception Introduction The case In re L.Y.L., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law...
Defining 'Arising From' in Anti-SLAPP Context: Insights from CITY OF COTATI v. CASHMAN Introduction In the landmark case of City of Cotati, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Gene Cashman et al., Defendants...
California Supreme Court Establishes Objective Standard for Anti-SLAPP Motions Introduction In the landmark case Equilon Enterprises, LLC v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (29 Cal.4th 53, 2002), the Supreme...
NAVELLIER v. SLETTEN: Expanding Anti-SLAPP Protections to Include Contract and Fraud Claims 1. Introduction In the landmark case of NAVELLIER v. SLETTEN (29 Cal.4th 82, 2002), the Supreme Court of...
Brady Compliance with Five-Year Discovery Limit: Analysis of CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County Introduction The case of CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles...
Establishing the Reasonable Range for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: In re JESSE JAMES ANDREWS Introduction The case of In re JESSE JAMES ANDREWS on Habeas Corpus (28 Cal.4th...