Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Death Penalty and Jury Instruction Standards in People v. Alfredo Prieto

Affirmation of Death Penalty and Jury Instruction Standards in People v. Alfredo Prieto

Date: Apr 22, 2003
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Jury Instruction Standards in People v. Alfredo Prieto Introduction People v. Alfredo Prieto (30 Cal.4th 226, 2003) is a significant judgment by the Supreme Court of...
Right to Self-Representation Upholding Under Faretta: People v. Omar Dent III

Right to Self-Representation Upholding Under Faretta: People v. Omar Dent III

Date: Apr 11, 2003
Right to Self-Representation Upholding Under Faretta: People v. Omar Dent III Introduction People v. Omar Dent III (30 Cal.4th 213), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on April 10, 2003,...
Recognition of Holder's Action for Fraud in Securities Under California Law

Recognition of Holder's Action for Fraud in Securities Under California Law

Date: Apr 8, 2003
Recognition of Holder's Action for Fraud in Securities Under California Law Introduction The case of MARIETTA SMALL, as Public Administrator, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRITZ COMPANIES, INC.,...
Bus Stop Location as a Dangerous Condition: A Comprehensive Analysis of Darlene BONANNO v. CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT AUTHority

Bus Stop Location as a Dangerous Condition: A Comprehensive Analysis of Darlene BONANNO v. CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT AUTHority

Date: Apr 8, 2003
Bus Stop Location as a Dangerous Condition: A Comprehensive Analysis of Darlene BONANNO v. CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT AUTHority Introduction In the landmark case of Darlene BONANNO v. CENTRAL...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Integrity in PEOPLE v. SNOW

Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Integrity in PEOPLE v. SNOW

Date: Apr 4, 2003
Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Integrity in PEOPLE v. SNOW Introduction PEOPLE v. SNOW (30 Cal.4th 43, 2003) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Marquez v. State: Affirming Additional Custody Credit under Penal Code Section 2900.5

Marquez v. State: Affirming Additional Custody Credit under Penal Code Section 2900.5

Date: Mar 28, 2003
Marquez v. State: Affirming Additional Custody Credit under Penal Code Section 2900.5 Introduction In re VINCENT MARQUEZ on Habeas Corpus. (30 Cal.4th 14) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Double Jeopardy Implications in Juror Discharge: Analysis of People v. Manuel Hernandez

Double Jeopardy Implications in Juror Discharge: Analysis of People v. Manuel Hernandez

Date: Mar 21, 2003
Double Jeopardy Implications in Juror Discharge: Analysis of People v. Manuel Hernandez Introduction People v. Manuel Hernandez (30 Cal.4th 1, 2003) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Specific Intent in Felony-Murder under California Law: People v. Jones

Establishing Specific Intent in Felony-Murder under California Law: People v. Jones

Date: Mar 18, 2003
Establishing Specific Intent in Felony-Murder under California Law: People v. Jones Introduction People v. Ernest Dwayne Jones is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, decided on...
Rejection of the Killpatrick-Kramer Rule: No Mandatory Advisement of Privilege Against Self-Incrimination for Self-Represented Defendants

Rejection of the Killpatrick-Kramer Rule: No Mandatory Advisement of Privilege Against Self-Incrimination for Self-Represented Defendants

Date: Mar 18, 2003
Rejection of the Killpatrick-Kramer Rule: No Mandatory Advisement of Privilege Against Self-Incrimination for Self-Represented Defendants Introduction The case of The People v. Mark Barnum (29...
Voluntary Absence of Custodial Defendants: Clarifying Section 1043(b)(2)

Voluntary Absence of Custodial Defendants: Clarifying Section 1043(b)(2)

Date: Mar 7, 2003
Voluntary Absence of Custodial Defendants: Clarifying Section 1043(b)(2) Introduction The People v. Raul Gomez Gutierrez (29 Cal.4th 1196, 2003) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Disgorgement Remedies Limited Under California Unfair Competition Law: KOREA SUPPLY COMPANY v. LOCKHEED MARTINCORPORATION

Disgorgement Remedies Limited Under California Unfair Competition Law: KOREA SUPPLY COMPANY v. LOCKHEED MARTINCORPORATION

Date: Mar 4, 2003
Disgorgement Remedies Limited Under California Unfair Competition Law: KOREA SUPPLY COMPANY v. LOCKHEED MARTINCORPORATION Introduction Korea Supply Company (KSC) initiated legal action against...
Class Action Certification Standards for Medical Monitoring Claims: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT of San Bernardino County

Class Action Certification Standards for Medical Monitoring Claims: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT of San Bernardino County

Date: Mar 4, 2003
Class Action Certification Standards for Medical Monitoring Claims: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT of San Bernardino County Introduction In Lockheed Martin Corporation et al. v. Superior...
Unconscionability of Arbitration Appeal Provisions in Employment Contracts: Little v. Auto Stiegler

Unconscionability of Arbitration Appeal Provisions in Employment Contracts: Little v. Auto Stiegler

Date: Feb 28, 2003
Unconscionability of Arbitration Appeal Provisions in Employment Contracts: Little v. Auto Stiegler Introduction Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc. (29 Cal.4th 1064, 2003) is a significant judgment by the...
Limiting Use of Pitchess Information to Specific Proceedings: Alford v. Superior Court Establishes Interpretation of Evidence Code §1045(e)

Limiting Use of Pitchess Information to Specific Proceedings: Alford v. Superior Court Establishes Interpretation of Evidence Code §1045(e)

Date: Feb 28, 2003
Limiting Use of Pitchess Information to Specific Proceedings: Alford v. Superior Court Establishes Interpretation of Evidence Code §1045(e) Introduction In the landmark case of Maurice Alford et al....
FEHA Defines Physical Disability Based on 'Limits' Rather Than 'Substantial Limits': COLMENARES v. BRAEMAR COUNTRY CLUB

FEHA Defines Physical Disability Based on 'Limits' Rather Than 'Substantial Limits': COLMENARES v. BRAEMAR COUNTRY CLUB

Date: Feb 21, 2003
FEHA Defines Physical Disability Based on 'Limits' Rather Than 'Substantial Limits': COLMENARES v. BRAEMAR COUNTRY CLUB Introduction Francisco COLMENARES v. BRAEMAR COUNTRY CLUB, Inc. is a landmark...
Admissibility of Prior Sexual Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. RELIFORD

Admissibility of Prior Sexual Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. RELIFORD

Date: Feb 11, 2003
Admissibility of Prior Sexual Offenses: Insights from PEOPLE v. RELIFORD Introduction PEOPLE v. RELIFORD, 29 Cal.4th 1007 (2003), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California, addresses the...
Clarifying "Likely" in California's Sexually Violent Predators Act: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBERGE

Clarifying "Likely" in California's Sexually Violent Predators Act: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBERGE

Date: Feb 7, 2003
Clarifying "Likely" in California's Sexually Violent Predators Act: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBERGE Introduction People v. Joseph Albert Roberge is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
De Novo Review Standard for Factual Innocence: Insights from People v. Jeanie Adair

De Novo Review Standard for Factual Innocence: Insights from People v. Jeanie Adair

Date: Jan 31, 2003
De Novo Review Standard for Factual Innocence: Insights from People v. Jeanie Adair Introduction People v. Jeanie Louise Adair (29 Cal.4th 895, 2003) is a pivotal case in California jurisprudence...
Interpretation of Education Code §44916: Timely Notification of Employment Status for Certificated Employees

Interpretation of Education Code §44916: Timely Notification of Employment Status for Certificated Employees

Date: Jan 31, 2003
Interpretation of Education Code §44916: Timely Notification of Employment Status for Certificated Employees Introduction The case of Alta Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School District...
Burgener v. People: Reinforcing Standards for Penalty Retrials and Jury Selection

Burgener v. People: Reinforcing Standards for Penalty Retrials and Jury Selection

Date: Jan 28, 2003
Burgener v. People: Reinforcing Standards for Penalty Retrials and Jury Selection Introduction In People v. Michael Ray Burgener, 29 Cal.4th 833 (2003), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert