Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Aguilar v. Lerner: Affirming Arbitration Agreements Amidst Statutory Waivers

Aguilar v. Lerner: Affirming Arbitration Agreements Amidst Statutory Waivers

Date: Apr 23, 2004
Aguilar v. Lerner: Affirming Arbitration Agreements Amidst Statutory Waivers Introduction In Raul V. Aguilar v. Esther R. Lerner (32 Cal.4th 974), decided by the Supreme Court of California on April...
Attorney Liability for Continuing Malicious Prosecution After Discovery of Lack of Probable Cause

Attorney Liability for Continuing Malicious Prosecution After Discovery of Lack of Probable Cause

Date: Apr 20, 2004
Attorney Liability for Continuing Malicious Prosecution After Discovery of Lack of Probable Cause Introduction The landmark case of Jerome Zamos et al. v. James T. Stroud et al. (32 Cal.4th 958,...
Single Objective in Multiple Regulatory Violations: Implications of People v. Britt

Single Objective in Multiple Regulatory Violations: Implications of People v. Britt

Date: Apr 20, 2004
Single Objective in Multiple Regulatory Violations: Implications of People v. Britt Introduction People v. Michael Frederick Britt is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
State-Agent Immunity of California Sheriffs Under Section 1983 and the Expanded Scope of Civil Code §52.1

State-Agent Immunity of California Sheriffs Under Section 1983 and the Expanded Scope of Civil Code §52.1

Date: Apr 6, 2004
State-Agent Immunity of California Sheriffs Under Section 1983 and the Expanded Scope of Civil Code §52.1 Introduction The case of David Venegas et al. v. County of Los Angeles et al., decided by the...
Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Sentencing and Joint Trial Procedures in The People v. Cleveland and Veasley

Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Sentencing and Joint Trial Procedures in The People v. Cleveland and Veasley

Date: Mar 26, 2004
Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Sentencing and Joint Trial Procedures in The People v. Cleveland and Veasley Introduction The People v. Cleveland and Veasley, 32 Cal.4th 704 (2004), is a...
Supreme Court of California Affirms Elder Abuse Act Claims Bypass CCP §425.13(a) Punitive Damage Requirements

Supreme Court of California Affirms Elder Abuse Act Claims Bypass CCP §425.13(a) Punitive Damage Requirements

Date: Mar 26, 2004
Supreme Court of California Affirms Elder Abuse Act Claims Bypass CCP §425.13(a) Punitive Damage Requirements Introduction The case of Covenant Care, Inc., et al. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles...
In re RAYMOND EDWARD STEELE: Expanding Postconviction Discovery Rights under Penal Code Section 1054.9

In re RAYMOND EDWARD STEELE: Expanding Postconviction Discovery Rights under Penal Code Section 1054.9

Date: Mar 9, 2004
In re RAYMOND EDWARD STEELE: Expanding Postconviction Discovery Rights under Penal Code Section 1054.9 Introduction The case of In re Raymond Edward Steele presents a pivotal moment in California's...
Presumption of Paternity in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from In re JESUSA V.

Presumption of Paternity in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from In re JESUSA V.

Date: Mar 2, 2004
Presumption of Paternity in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from In re JESUSA V. Introduction The landmark case In re JESUSA V. addresses critical issues surrounding the determination of presumed...
Coverage Extended for Close Proximity Theft under Jeweler's Block Insurance Policies in E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich Am. Insurance Company

Coverage Extended for Close Proximity Theft under Jeweler's Block Insurance Policies in E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich Am. Insurance Company

Date: Feb 24, 2004
Coverage Extended for Close Proximity Theft under Jeweler's Block Insurance Policies Introduction E.M.M.I. Inc., a prominent jewelry manufacturer and marketer, found itself embroiled in a legal...
Quantum Meruit Recovery Permitted Despite Fee Sharing Violations Under Rule 2-200

Quantum Meruit Recovery Permitted Despite Fee Sharing Violations Under Rule 2-200

Date: Feb 24, 2004
Quantum Meruit Recovery Permitted Despite Fee Sharing Violations Under Rule 2-200 Introduction The case of Huskinson Brown, LLP v. Mervyn H. Wolf et al. (32 Cal.4th 453) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Establishing a Sufficient Factual Basis for Guilty Pleas under Penal Code Section 1192.5

Establishing a Sufficient Factual Basis for Guilty Pleas under Penal Code Section 1192.5

Date: Feb 20, 2004
Establishing a Sufficient Factual Basis for Guilty Pleas under Penal Code Section 1192.5 Introduction In The People v. Henry James Holmes, 32 Cal.4th 432 (2004), the Supreme Court of California...
Shasta Community Services District v. Richmond et al.: Reinterpreting Article XIII D on Water Connection Fees

Shasta Community Services District v. Richmond et al.: Reinterpreting Article XIII D on Water Connection Fees

Date: Feb 10, 2004
Shasta Community Services District v. Richmond et al.: Reinterpreting Article XIII D on Water Connection Fees Introduction In the landmark case of Shasta Community Services District v. Richmond et...
Parol Evidence Rule as a Basis for Favorable Termination in Malicious Prosecution: An Analysis of CASA HERRERA, INC. v. NASSER BEYDOUN

Parol Evidence Rule as a Basis for Favorable Termination in Malicious Prosecution: An Analysis of CASA HERRERA, INC. v. NASSER BEYDOUN

Date: Feb 3, 2004
Parol Evidence Rule as a Basis for Favorable Termination in Malicious Prosecution: An Analysis of CASA HERRERA, INC. v. NASSER BEYDOUN Introduction CASA HERRERA, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v....
Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Alleged Juror Misconduct: People v. Danks

Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Alleged Juror Misconduct: People v. Danks

Date: Feb 3, 2004
Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Alleged Juror Misconduct: People v. Danks Introduction People v. Joseph Martin Danks (32 Cal.4th 269) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Retrial of Strike Allegations Permitted After Appellate Reversal: Insights from People v. Barragan (32 Cal.4th 236)

Retrial of Strike Allegations Permitted After Appellate Reversal: Insights from People v. Barragan (32 Cal.4th 236)

Date: Jan 30, 2004
Retrial of Strike Allegations Permitted After Appellate Reversal: Insights from People v. Barragan (32 Cal.4th 236) Introduction In People v. Antonio J. Barragan (32 Cal.4th 236), the Supreme Court...
Conduct Credits in Sentencing: Insights from People v. Johnson

Conduct Credits in Sentencing: Insights from People v. Johnson

Date: Jan 30, 2004
Conduct Credits in Sentencing: Insights from People v. Johnson Introduction People v. Johnson, 32 Cal.4th 260, decided by the Supreme Court of California on January 29, 2004, addresses the intricate...
California Supreme Court Reclassifies Criminal Venue as a Question of Law in People v. Posey

California Supreme Court Reclassifies Criminal Venue as a Question of Law in People v. Posey

Date: Jan 23, 2004
California Supreme Court Reclassifies Criminal Venue as a Question of Law in People v. Posey Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Christopher Francisco Posey, decided on January 22, 2004,...
Jury Instruction on Lesser Included Offenses in Capital Felony Murder Cases: People v. Valdez

Jury Instruction on Lesser Included Offenses in Capital Felony Murder Cases: People v. Valdez

Date: Jan 7, 2004
Jury Instruction on Lesser Included Offenses in Capital Felony Murder Cases: People v. Valdez Introduction In People v. Alfredo Reyes Valdez (32 Cal.4th 73, 2004), the Supreme Court of California...
Absolute Privilege for Government Reports under Civil Code Section 47(b): Lydia Ortiz Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB

Absolute Privilege for Government Reports under Civil Code Section 47(b): Lydia Ortiz Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB

Date: Jan 6, 2004
Absolute Privilege for Government Reports under Civil Code Section 47(b): Lydia Ortiz Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB Introduction The case of Lydia Ortiz Hagberg v. California Federal Bank...
Absolute Privilege for Reports to Law Enforcement under Civil Code Section 47(b): Lydia Ortiz Hagberg v. California Federal BankFSB

Absolute Privilege for Reports to Law Enforcement under Civil Code Section 47(b): Lydia Ortiz Hagberg v. California Federal BankFSB

Date: Jan 6, 2004
Absolute Privilege for Reports to Law Enforcement under Civil Code Section 47(b): Lydia Ortiz Hagberg v. California Federal BankFSB Introduction In the landmark case of Lydia Ortiz Hagberg v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert