Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Refusal of Antipsychotic Medication by Mentally Disordered Offenders: A New Precedent

Refusal of Antipsychotic Medication by Mentally Disordered Offenders: A New Precedent

Date: Jan 6, 2004
Refusal of Antipsychotic Medication by Mentally Disordered Offenders: A New Precedent Introduction The case of In re Kanuri Surgury Qawi represents a significant development in the intersection of...
California Supreme Court Reaffirms Single-Publication Rule, Limits Discovery Rule in Defamation Cases: SHIVELY v. BOZANICH

California Supreme Court Reaffirms Single-Publication Rule, Limits Discovery Rule in Defamation Cases: SHIVELY v. BOZANICH

Date: Dec 23, 2003
California Supreme Court Reaffirms Single-Publication Rule, Limits Discovery Rule in Defamation Cases: SHIVELY v. BOZANICH Introduction In SHIVELY v. BOZANICH (31 Cal.4th 1230, 2003), the Supreme...
Limited Liability of Public Entities for 911 Dispatcher Failures: EASTBURN v. REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY

Limited Liability of Public Entities for 911 Dispatcher Failures: EASTBURN v. REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY

Date: Dec 19, 2003
Limited Liability of Public Entities for 911 Dispatcher Failures: EASTBURN v. REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY Introduction EASTBURN v. REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY is a landmark case decided...
Repudiation of Contract Does Not Automatically Waive Arbitration Rights: Insights from PacifiCare v. Saint Agnes Medical Center

Repudiation of Contract Does Not Automatically Waive Arbitration Rights: Insights from PacifiCare v. Saint Agnes Medical Center

Date: Dec 19, 2003
Repudiation of Contract Does Not Automatically Waive Arbitration Rights: Insights from PacifiCare v. Saint Agnes Medical Center Introduction The case of Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of...
Forfeiture of Appellate Rights in HIV Testing Orders: People v. Stowell

Forfeiture of Appellate Rights in HIV Testing Orders: People v. Stowell

Date: Dec 2, 2003
Forfeiture of Appellate Rights in HIV Testing Orders: People v. Stowell Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Stowell (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1107, the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Challenge HIV Testing Orders Without Timely Objection: People v. Butler

Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Challenge HIV Testing Orders Without Timely Objection: People v. Butler

Date: Dec 2, 2003
Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Challenge HIV Testing Orders Without Timely Objection: People v. Butler Introduction People v. Willie Earl Butler is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
SCHIFANDO v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES: FEHA Remedies Suffice Without Exhausting City Charter Processes

SCHIFANDO v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES: FEHA Remedies Suffice Without Exhausting City Charter Processes

Date: Dec 2, 2003
SCHIFANDO v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES: FEHA Remedies Suffice Without Exhausting City Charter Processes Introduction Steve Schifando, an employee of the City of Los Angeles' Parks and Recreation...
Requiring Asportation in Carjacking: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. DANIEL SAPIEN LOPEZ

Requiring Asportation in Carjacking: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. DANIEL SAPIEN LOPEZ

Date: Nov 25, 2003
Requiring Asportation in Carjacking: Insights from THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANIEL SAPIEN LOPEZ 1. Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Daniel Sapien Lopez, the Supreme...
Strict Employer Liability for Supervisory Sexual Harassment under FEHA

Strict Employer Liability for Supervisory Sexual Harassment under FEHA

Date: Nov 25, 2003
Strict Employer Liability for Supervisory Sexual Harassment under FEHA Introduction In the landmark case State DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES v. SUPERIOR COURT of Sacramento County (31 Cal.4th 1026,...
Reversal of Death Sentence Due to Juror Selection Error: The People v. James Matthew Heard

Reversal of Death Sentence Due to Juror Selection Error: The People v. James Matthew Heard

Date: Aug 29, 2003
Reversal of Death Sentence Due to Juror Selection Error: The People v. James Matthew Heard Introduction The People v. James Matthew Heard is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Duty of Care in Youth Sports: In-depth Commentary on KAHN v. EAST SIDE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Duty of Care in Youth Sports: In-depth Commentary on KAHN v. EAST SIDE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Date: Aug 29, 2003
Duty of Care in Youth Sports: In-depth Commentary on KAHN v. EAST SIDE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Introduction The landmark case KAHN v. EAST SIDE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (31 Cal.4th 990)...
Balancing Trade Secret Protection and Free Speech: Insights from DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. v. Andrew Bunner

Balancing Trade Secret Protection and Free Speech: Insights from DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. v. Andrew Bunner

Date: Aug 26, 2003
Balancing Trade Secret Protection and Free Speech: Insights from DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. v. Andrew Bunner Introduction The case of DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. v. Andrew Bunner (31...
Affirmation of Broad Interpretation of Financial-Gain Special Circumstance in Capital Sentencing

Affirmation of Broad Interpretation of Financial-Gain Special Circumstance in Capital Sentencing

Date: Aug 26, 2003
Affirmation of Broad Interpretation of Financial-Gain Special Circumstance in Capital Sentencing Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the case of The People v. Mark Christopher Crew,...
Reaffirming Trial Courts' Deference in Batson/Wheeler Challenges: Analysis of PEOPLE v. REYNOSO

Reaffirming Trial Courts' Deference in Batson/Wheeler Challenges: Analysis of PEOPLE v. REYNOSO

Date: Aug 26, 2003
Reaffirming Trial Courts' Deference in Batson/Wheeler Challenges: Analysis of PEOPLE v. REYNOSO Introduction People v. John Paul Reynoso is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Reaffirmation of the Waiver Rule in Sentencing Appeals: An Examination of People v. González et al. (31 Cal.4th 745)

Reaffirmation of the Waiver Rule in Sentencing Appeals: An Examination of People v. González et al. (31 Cal.4th 745)

Date: Aug 22, 2003
Reaffirmation of the Waiver Rule in Sentencing Appeals: An Examination of People v. González et al. (31 Cal.4th 745) Introduction In the landmark case of People v. González et al., the Supreme Court...
Enhancing Due Process in Civil Commitment: Insights from People v. Robert Williams

Enhancing Due Process in Civil Commitment: Insights from People v. Robert Williams

Date: Aug 22, 2003
Enhancing Due Process in Civil Commitment: Insights from People v. Robert Williams Introduction The case of THE PEOPLE v. ROBERT WILLIAMS (31 Cal.4th 757) represents a significant judiciary...
Affirmation of Prior Murder Special Circumstance for Death Penalty Based on Out-of-State Conviction in PEOPLE v. MARTINEZ

Affirmation of Prior Murder Special Circumstance for Death Penalty Based on Out-of-State Conviction in PEOPLE v. MARTINEZ

Date: Aug 19, 2003
Affirmation of Prior Murder Special Circumstance for Death Penalty Based on Out-of-State Conviction in PEOPLE v. MARTINEZ Introduction In People v. Omar Fuentes Martinez (31 Cal.4th 673), the Supreme...
Malicious Prosecution Claims Subject to Anti-SLAPP Scrutiny: Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche

Malicious Prosecution Claims Subject to Anti-SLAPP Scrutiny: Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche

Date: Aug 19, 2003
Malicious Prosecution Claims Subject to Anti-SLAPP Scrutiny: Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche Introduction Jarrow Formulas, Inc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Sandra Hogan LaMarche, et al.,...
Qualified Privilege of Communication Under Civil Code Section 43.8 Extended to Entities

Qualified Privilege of Communication Under Civil Code Section 43.8 Extended to Entities

Date: Aug 19, 2003
Qualified Privilege of Communication Under Civil Code Section 43.8 Extended to Entities Introduction The case of Allen HASSAN v. MERCY AMERICAN RIVER HOSPITAL (31 Cal.4th 709) adjudicated by the...
California Supreme Court Establishes Clear Boundaries for Pollution Exclusions in CGL Policies

California Supreme Court Establishes Clear Boundaries for Pollution Exclusions in CGL Policies

Date: Aug 15, 2003
California Supreme Court Establishes Clear Boundaries for Pollution Exclusions in CGL Policies Introduction In the landmark case of John R. MacKinnon et al. v. Truck Insurance Exchange, the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert