Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

California Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence and Validity of Revised CALJIC Instructions in PEOPLE v. BROWN

California Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence and Validity of Revised CALJIC Instructions in PEOPLE v. BROWN

Date: Jul 13, 2004
California Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence and Validity of Revised CALJIC Instructions in PEOPLE v. BROWN Introduction In the landmark case The People v. John George Brown, Jr., decided by the...
Voluntary Admission of Prior Convictions Under Totality of Circumstances: An Analysis of People v. Mosby

Voluntary Admission of Prior Convictions Under Totality of Circumstances: An Analysis of People v. Mosby

Date: Jul 9, 2004
Voluntary Admission of Prior Convictions Under Totality of Circumstances: An Analysis of People v. Mosby Introduction People v. Mosby (2004) is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard for Section 1385 in Three Strikes Sentencing

Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard for Section 1385 in Three Strikes Sentencing

Date: Jul 9, 2004
Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard for Section 1385 in Three Strikes Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Keith Ishmeal Carmony (33 Cal.4th 367, 2004), the Supreme...
Expanding "State Service" Under Public Employees' Retirement Law: Nolan v. City of Anaheim

Expanding "State Service" Under Public Employees' Retirement Law: Nolan v. City of Anaheim

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Expanding "State Service" Under Public Employees' Retirement Law: Nolan v. City of Anaheim Introduction In the landmark case of Steven W. Nolan v. City of Anaheim (33 Cal.4th 335), the Supreme Court...
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Clemantt Arnold: Affirming the Scope of Johnson Waivers

Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Clemantt Arnold: Affirming the Scope of Johnson Waivers

Date: Jun 29, 2004
Affirming the Scope of Johnson Waivers: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Clemantt Arnold Introduction In People v. Clemantt Arnold, the Supreme Court of California addressed a critical issue...
Mandatory Sex Offender Registration Upheld: Overruling IN RE REED

Mandatory Sex Offender Registration Upheld: Overruling IN RE REED

Date: Jun 29, 2004
Mandatory Sex Offender Registration Upheld: Overruling IN RE REED Introduction The Supreme Court of California, on June 28, 2004, delivered a landmark judgment in In re Leon Casey Alva on Habeas...
Clarifying Nonkiller Liability Under the Felony-Murder Rule: California Supreme Court's Cavitt v. The People

Clarifying Nonkiller Liability Under the Felony-Murder Rule: California Supreme Court's Cavitt v. The People

Date: Jun 22, 2004
Clarifying Nonkiller Liability Under the Felony-Murder Rule: California Supreme Court's Cavitt v. The People Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. James Freddie Cavitt (33 Cal.4th 187),...
Double Jeopardy and Death Penalty Affirmed in Automatic Appeal Context: PEOPLE v. HOLLOWAY

Double Jeopardy and Death Penalty Affirmed in Automatic Appeal Context: PEOPLE v. HOLLOWAY

Date: Jun 18, 2004
Double Jeopardy and Death Penalty Affirmed in Automatic Appeal Context: PEOPLE v. HOLLOWAY Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Duane Holloway, Defendant and Appellant...
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 21 Amendments to Juvenile Probation: No Ex Post Facto Violation

California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 21 Amendments to Juvenile Probation: No Ex Post Facto Violation

Date: Jun 18, 2004
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 21 Amendments to Juvenile Probation: No Ex Post Facto Violation Introduction The case of John L., Petitioner v. The Superior Court of San Diego County,...
Non-Jurisdictional Compliance with Code Civ. Proc §594(b): Insights from In re Marriage of LYNN E. and TERRY GODDARD

Non-Jurisdictional Compliance with Code Civ. Proc §594(b): Insights from In re Marriage of LYNN E. and TERRY GODDARD

Date: Jun 8, 2004
Non-Jurisdictional Compliance with Code Civ. Proc §594(b): Insights from In re Marriage of LYNN E. and TERRY GODDARD Introduction The case of In re Marriage of LYNN E. and TERRY GODDARD (33 Cal.4th...
Delegation of Visitation Decisions and Preservation of Appellate Rights in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from IN RE S.B. et al.

Delegation of Visitation Decisions and Preservation of Appellate Rights in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from IN RE S.B. et al.

Date: May 28, 2004
Delegation of Visitation Decisions and Preservation of Appellate Rights in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from IN RE S.B. et al. Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in IN RE...
Exclusion of DUI Drug Offenses from Probation and Diversion Under Proposition 36

Exclusion of DUI Drug Offenses from Probation and Diversion Under Proposition 36

Date: May 28, 2004
Exclusion of DUI Drug Offenses from Probation and Diversion Under Proposition 36 Introduction The case The People v. Michelle Elaine Canty (32 Cal.4th 1266, 2004) addresses the applicability of...
Mandatory Allegation of Claim Presentation Compliance in Tort Claims Act Actions: Bodde v. Superior Court of Kings County

Mandatory Allegation of Claim Presentation Compliance in Tort Claims Act Actions: Bodde v. Superior Court of Kings County

Date: May 25, 2004
Mandatory Allegation of Claim Presentation Compliance in Tort Claims Act Actions: Bodde v. Superior Court of Kings County Introduction In THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR...
Conspicuousness and Clarity Required for Limitations on Permissive User Coverage: Supreme Court of California Affirms in Haynes v. Farmers Insurance

Conspicuousness and Clarity Required for Limitations on Permissive User Coverage: Supreme Court of California Affirms in Haynes v. Farmers Insurance

Date: May 18, 2004
Conspicuousness and Clarity Required for Limitations on Permissive User Coverage: Supreme Court of California Affirms in Haynes v. Farmers Insurance Introduction The case of Joshua Lee HAYNES v....
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Validity of Sentencing Instructions in People v. Pollock

Affirmation of Death Sentence and Validity of Sentencing Instructions in People v. Pollock

Date: May 18, 2004
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Validity of Sentencing Instructions in People v. Pollock Introduction The case of The People v. Milton Ray Pollock (32 Cal.4th 1153) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in People v. Lenart: Implications for Evidence Admissibility and Jury Instructions

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in People v. Lenart: Implications for Evidence Admissibility and Jury Instructions

Date: May 7, 2004
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in People v. Lenart: Implications for Evidence Admissibility and Jury Instructions Introduction People v. Thomas Howard Lenart (32 Cal.4th 1107, 2004) is a...
Limiting Property Owner Liability for Unforeseeable Third-Party Criminal Acts: Analysis of AARON WIENER et al. v. SOUTHCOAST CHILDCARECENTERS, INC.

Limiting Property Owner Liability for Unforeseeable Third-Party Criminal Acts: Analysis of AARON WIENER et al. v. SOUTHCOAST CHILDCARECENTERS, INC.

Date: May 7, 2004
Limiting Property Owner Liability for Unforeseeable Third-Party Criminal Acts: Analysis of AARON WIENER et al. v. SOUTHCOAST CHILDCARECENTERS, INC. 1. Introduction The case of AARON WIENER et al. v....
LaMusga v. LaMusga: Clarifying Custodial Relocation Standards in California

LaMusga v. LaMusga: Clarifying Custodial Relocation Standards in California

Date: Apr 30, 2004
LaMusga v. LaMusga: Clarifying Custodial Relocation Standards in California Introduction In the landmark case of In re the Marriage of LaMusga (32 Cal.4th 1072, 2004), the Supreme Court of California...
Multiple Subdivision (d) Enhancements under Penal Code §12022.53: Insights from People v. Oates

Multiple Subdivision (d) Enhancements under Penal Code §12022.53: Insights from People v. Oates

Date: Apr 27, 2004
Multiple Subdivision (d) Enhancements under Penal Code §12022.53: Insights from People v. Oates Introduction People v. Jimmie Lee Oates, 32 Cal.4th 1048 (2004), addresses a critical interpretation of...
Trade Secrets and Public Disclosure: California Supreme Court Upholds Transparency in Insurance Data under Proposition 103

Trade Secrets and Public Disclosure: California Supreme Court Upholds Transparency in Insurance Data under Proposition 103

Date: Apr 27, 2004
Trade Secrets and Public Disclosure: California Supreme Court Upholds Transparency in Insurance Data under Proposition 103 Introduction In the landmark case State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert