Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Use of Prior Juvenile Adjudications for Sentence Enhancement Upheld under California's "Three Strikes" Law

Use of Prior Juvenile Adjudications for Sentence Enhancement Upheld under California's "Three Strikes" Law

Date: Aug 20, 2009
Use of Prior Juvenile Adjudications for Sentence Enhancement Upheld under California's "Three Strikes" Law Introduction The People v. Vince Vinhtuong Nguyen (46 Cal.4th 1007) is a pivotal decision by...
Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Written Confinement Orders in Juvenile Court Proceedings

Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Written Confinement Orders in Juvenile Court Proceedings

Date: Aug 18, 2009
Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Written Confinement Orders in Juvenile Court Proceedings Introduction The case of In re JULIAN R. (47 Cal.4th 487) addressed critical procedural requirements in...
Martinez v. The People: Affirming Death Penalty and Clarifying Judicial Discretion in Capital Case Proceedings

Martinez v. The People: Affirming Death Penalty and Clarifying Judicial Discretion in Capital Case Proceedings

Date: Aug 14, 2009
Martinez v. The People: Affirming Death Penalty and Clarifying Judicial Discretion in Capital Case Proceedings Introduction Martinez v. The People (47 Cal.4th 399, 2009) is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. RAYmond Oscar Butler: Establishing Legal Precedents

Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. RAYmond Oscar Butler: Establishing Legal Precedents

Date: Aug 13, 2009
Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. RAYmond Oscar Butler: Establishing Legal Precedents Introduction PEOPLE v. RAYmond Oscar Butler is a significant 2009 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation Upholds Due Process and Identification Procedures in Capital Case: People v. Avila

Affirmation Upholds Due Process and Identification Procedures in Capital Case: People v. Avila

Date: Aug 13, 2009
Affirmation Upholds Due Process and Identification Procedures in Capital Case: People v. Avila Introduction People v. Joseph Avila (46 Cal.4th 680, 2009) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. Brandy G. Hunt: Exclusive Remedies under Civil Code Sections 1719 and 3287

Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. Brandy G. Hunt: Exclusive Remedies under Civil Code Sections 1719 and 3287

Date: Aug 11, 2009
Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. Brandy G. Hunt: Exclusive Remedies under Civil Code Sections 1719 and 3287 Introduction Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. Brandy G. Hunt is a landmark decision...
Insurer's Duty to Defend in Cases of Intentional Acts: Analysis of Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange

Insurer's Duty to Defend in Cases of Intentional Acts: Analysis of Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange

Date: Aug 4, 2009
Insurer's Duty to Defend in Cases of Intentional Acts: Analysis of Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange Introduction The case of Jonathan Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of...
California Supreme Court Limits Privacy Invasion Claims in Workplace Surveillance

California Supreme Court Limits Privacy Invasion Claims in Workplace Surveillance

Date: Aug 4, 2009
California Supreme Court Limits Privacy Invasion Claims in Workplace Surveillance Introduction The landmark case of Hernandez et al. v. Hillsides, Inc. et al. (47 Cal.4th 272) addressed critical...
Supreme Court of California Affirms Death Sentence, Reiterating Standards for Grand Jury Representation and Joint Trials in Capital Murder Cases

Supreme Court of California Affirms Death Sentence, Reiterating Standards for Grand Jury Representation and Joint Trials in Capital Murder Cases

Date: Jul 31, 2009
Supreme Court of California Affirms Death Sentence, Reiterating Standards for Grand Jury Representation and Joint Trials in Capital Murder Cases Introduction In the case of The People v. Shaun Kareem...
Use of Stolen ATM Cards Outside a Building Does Not Constitute Entry for Burglary: Celeste Carrington Case

Use of Stolen ATM Cards Outside a Building Does Not Constitute Entry for Burglary: Celeste Carrington Case

Date: Jul 28, 2009
Use of Stolen ATM Cards Outside a Building Does Not Constitute Entry for Burglary: Celeste Carrington Case Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Celeste Simone Carrington (47 Cal.4th 145),...
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from PEOPLE v. ANDERSON

Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from PEOPLE v. ANDERSON

Date: Jul 24, 2009
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from PEOPLE v. ANDERSON Introduction In the landmark case People v. Barry Lane Anderson, 47 Cal.4th 92 (2009), the Supreme Court of California...
California Supreme Court Upholds Retrial of Sentencing Enhancements in Anthony Porter Case

California Supreme Court Upholds Retrial of Sentencing Enhancements in Anthony Porter Case

Date: Jul 24, 2009
California Supreme Court Upholds Retrial of Sentencing Enhancements in Anthony Porter v. Superior Court of Monterey County Introduction The case of Anthony Porter v. Superior Court of Monterey County...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct in People v. Friend

Affirmation of Death Sentence and Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct in People v. Friend

Date: Jul 21, 2009
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct in People v. Friend Introduction People v. Jack Wayne Friend (47 Cal.4th 1) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing Standards in Capital Murder: People v. Michael Bernard Lewis

Affirmation of Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing Standards in Capital Murder: People v. Michael Bernard Lewis

Date: Jul 17, 2009
Affirmation of Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing Standards in Capital Murder: People v. Michael Bernard Lewis Introduction People v. Michael Bernard Lewis (46 Cal.4th 1255, 2009) is a landmark...
Admissibility of Partition Ratio Evidence in Generic DUI Cases: A New Precedent Established in People v. McNeal

Admissibility of Partition Ratio Evidence in Generic DUI Cases: A New Precedent Established in People v. McNeal

Date: Jul 10, 2009
Admissibility of Partition Ratio Evidence in Generic DUI Cases: A New Precedent Established in People v. McNeal Introduction People v. Timmie Lance McNeal, 46 Cal.4th 1183 (2009), is a landmark...
Reaffirmation of Prior Conviction Validity in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from People v. Robert Zane Curl

Reaffirmation of Prior Conviction Validity in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from People v. Robert Zane Curl

Date: Jul 9, 2009
Reaffirmation of Prior Conviction Validity in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from People v. Robert Zane Curl Introduction People v. Robert Zane Curl is a significant judgment delivered by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Sentence with Modified Sentencing for Second-Degree Murder in Multiple Homicide Case

Affirmation of Death Sentence with Modified Sentencing for Second-Degree Murder in Multiple Homicide Case

Date: Jul 7, 2009
Affirmation of Death Sentence with Modified Sentencing for Second-Degree Murder in Multiple Homicide Case Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Ramon Jay Rogers (46 Cal.4th 1136), the...
Supreme Court of California Upholds 'Pervasive or Severe' Standard in Civil Code §51.9 Sexual Harassment Claims

Supreme Court of California Upholds 'Pervasive or Severe' Standard in Civil Code §51.9 Sexual Harassment Claims

Date: Jul 3, 2009
Supreme Court of California Upholds 'Pervasive or Severe' Standard in Civil Code §51.9 Sexual Harassment Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Suzan Hughes v. Christopher Pair, the Supreme...
Clarifying Felony-Murder Doctrine: Supreme Court of California Affirms Denial of Change of Venue in People v. Farley

Clarifying Felony-Murder Doctrine: Supreme Court of California Affirms Denial of Change of Venue in People v. Farley

Date: Jul 3, 2009
Clarifying Felony-Murder Doctrine: Supreme Court of California Affirms Denial of Change of Venue in People v. Farley Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Farley, the Supreme Court of...
Strict Standing Requirements under California’s Unfair Competition Law and LABOR CODE Private Attorneys General Act: Insights from Amalgamated Transit Union v. Superior Court

Strict Standing Requirements under California’s Unfair Competition Law and LABOR CODE Private Attorneys General Act: Insights from Amalgamated Transit Union v. Superior Court

Date: Jun 30, 2009
Strict Standing Requirements under California’s Unfair Competition Law and Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act Introduction The case of Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO, et al. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert