Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

California Supreme Court Clarifies Class Action Requirements for Unfair Competition Law and PAGA Representative Actions

California Supreme Court Clarifies Class Action Requirements for Unfair Competition Law and PAGA Representative Actions

Date: Jun 30, 2009
California Supreme Court Clarifies Class Action Requirements for Unfair Competition Law and PAGA Representative Actions Introduction In the landmark case Jose A. Arias v. The Superior Court of San...
Clarifying Conduct Credit Eligibility under Penal Code Section 4019: The People v. Dieck Decision

Clarifying Conduct Credit Eligibility under Penal Code Section 4019: The People v. Dieck Decision

Date: Jun 26, 2009
Clarifying Conduct Credit Eligibility under Penal Code Section 4019: The People v. Dieck Decision Introduction The People v. Roland William Dieck (46 Cal.4th 934), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Implied Mandatory Duties of Public Entities under Government Code § 815.6: Guzman v. County of Monterey

Implied Mandatory Duties of Public Entities under Government Code § 815.6: Guzman v. County of Monterey

Date: Jun 23, 2009
Implied Mandatory Duties of Public Entities under Government Code § 815.6: Guzman v. County of Monterey Introduction In Javier R. Guzman et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. County of Monterey et...
Reaffirming Aider and Abettor Liability in Gang-Related Homicides: Analysis of The People v. Medina et al.

Reaffirming Aider and Abettor Liability in Gang-Related Homicides: Analysis of The People v. Medina et al.

Date: Jun 23, 2009
Reaffirming Aider and Abettor Liability in Gang-Related Homicides: Analysis of The People v. Medina et al. Introduction The People v. Jose Jesus Medina et al. (46 Cal.4th 913) is a landmark decision...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Felony Murder Case: Upholding Miranda Waiver and Admissibility of Victim-Impact Evidence

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Felony Murder Case: Upholding Miranda Waiver and Admissibility of Victim-Impact Evidence

Date: Jun 16, 2009
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Felony Murder Case: Upholding Miranda Waiver and Admissibility of Victim-Impact Evidence Introduction This commentary provides an in-depth analysis of the Supreme...
Unruh Civil Rights Act Expanded: Damages for ADA Violations Without Proving Intentional Discrimination

Unruh Civil Rights Act Expanded: Damages for ADA Violations Without Proving Intentional Discrimination

Date: Jun 12, 2009
Unruh Civil Rights Act Expanded: Damages for ADA Violations Without Proving Intentional Discrimination Introduction Munson v. Del Taco, Inc. (46 Cal.4th 661, 2009) is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. DAVIS: Implications for Capital Punishment and Pretrial Procedures in High-Profile Cases

Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. DAVIS: Implications for Capital Punishment and Pretrial Procedures in High-Profile Cases

Date: Jun 2, 2009
Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. DAVIS: Implications for Capital Punishment and Pretrial Procedures in High-Profile Cases Introduction PEOPLE v. DAVIS, decided by the Supreme...
Appealability of Section 366.26(c)(3) Orders: A New California Supreme Court Precedent

Appealability of Section 366.26(c)(3) Orders: A New California Supreme Court Precedent

Date: May 29, 2009
Appealability of Section 366.26(c)(3) Orders: A New California Supreme Court Precedent Introduction The case of In re S.B. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law (2009) 46 Cal.4th 529...
Collateral Estoppel in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Hernandez v. City of Pomona

Collateral Estoppel in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Hernandez v. City of Pomona

Date: May 29, 2009
Collateral Estoppel in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Hernandez v. City of Pomona Introduction The case of Bonnie Hernandez, as Administrator, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants versus...
Impact of Proposition 64 on Standing Requirements in UCL Class Actions: In re Tobacco II Cases

Impact of Proposition 64 on Standing Requirements in UCL Class Actions: In re Tobacco II Cases

Date: May 19, 2009
Impact of Proposition 64 on Standing Requirements in UCL Class Actions: In re Tobacco II Cases Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in In re Tobacco II Cases (46 Cal.4th 298, 2009)...
Silence at Jury Polling Does Not Constitute Disagreement under CCP §618: Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.

Silence at Jury Polling Does Not Constitute Disagreement under CCP §618: Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.

Date: May 8, 2009
Silence at Jury Polling Does Not Constitute Disagreement under CCP §618: Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc. Introduction Keener et al. v. Jeld-Wen, Inc. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Totality of Circumstances and Discretion in Midtrial Revocation of Self-Representation: People v. Lawrence

Totality of Circumstances and Discretion in Midtrial Revocation of Self-Representation: People v. Lawrence

Date: May 1, 2009
Totality of Circumstances and Discretion in Midtrial Revocation of Self-Representation: People v. Lawrence Introduction People v. Ringo Lawrence (46 Cal.4th 186) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Conditional Reversal Standard Established for Erroneous Denial of Pitchess Discovery: People v. Gaines

Conditional Reversal Standard Established for Erroneous Denial of Pitchess Discovery: People v. Gaines

Date: May 1, 2009
Conditional Reversal Standard Established for Erroneous Denial of Pitchess Discovery: People v. Gaines Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Rodney Louis Gaines (46 Cal.4th 172), the...
Mandatory Compliance with Penal Code Section 1385: Ensuring Judicial Accountability

Mandatory Compliance with Penal Code Section 1385: Ensuring Judicial Accountability

Date: Apr 28, 2009
Mandatory Compliance with Penal Code Section 1385: Ensuring Judicial Accountability Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE v. THOMAS Bonnetta et al. (46 Cal.4th 143), the Supreme Court of...
Generalized Intent to Kill Sufficient for Attempted Murder Conviction: Insights from People v. Stone (2009)

Generalized Intent to Kill Sufficient for Attempted Murder Conviction: Insights from People v. Stone (2009)

Date: Apr 24, 2009
Generalized Intent to Kill Sufficient for Attempted Murder Conviction: Insights from People v. Stone (2009) Introduction People v. Nicholas Scott Stone is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Expansion of the Prison-Delivery Rule to Civil Appeals in California

Expansion of the Prison-Delivery Rule to Civil Appeals in California

Date: Apr 24, 2009
Expansion of the Prison-Delivery Rule to Civil Appeals in California Introduction In the landmark case of Peter Silverbrand v. County of Los Angeles et al. (46 Cal.4th 106, 2009), the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Upholding Judicial Standards in The People v. Hawthorne

Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Upholding Judicial Standards in The People v. Hawthorne

Date: Apr 24, 2009
Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Upholding Judicial Standards in The People v. Hawthorne Introduction The People v. Carlos Anthony Hawthorne (46 Cal.4th 67, 2009) is a landmark decision by the...
Life Insurance Exclusion from the Consumers Legal Remedies Act: Fairbanks v. Superior Court

Life Insurance Exclusion from the Consumers Legal Remedies Act: Fairbanks v. Superior Court

Date: Apr 21, 2009
Life Insurance Exclusion from the Consumers Legal Remedies Act: Fairbanks v. Superior Court Introduction In the landmark case Pauline Fairbanks et al. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County (46...
Reaffirming the Stanson Standard: Anti-SLAPP Protections for Municipal Communications in Morfin Vargas v. City of Salinas

Reaffirming the Stanson Standard: Anti-SLAPP Protections for Municipal Communications in Morfin Vargas v. City of Salinas

Date: Apr 21, 2009
Reaffirming the Stanson Standard: Anti-SLAPP Protections for Municipal Communications in Morfin Vargas v. City of Salinas Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in Angelina Morfin...
Expanding Evidence Under Section 1108: People v. Gary Dean Story and the Felony Murder Rule

Expanding Evidence Under Section 1108: People v. Gary Dean Story and the Felony Murder Rule

Date: Apr 10, 2009
Expanding Evidence Under Section 1108: People v. Gary Dean Story and the Felony Murder Rule Introduction People v. Gary Dean Story (45 Cal.4th 1282, 2009) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert