Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Judicial Disqualification on Due Process Grounds: The Freeman Decision and Its Implications Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. MARILYN KAYE FREEMAN (47 Cal.4th 993, 2010), the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Juror Impartiality Standards in People v. Martinez Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Tommy Jesse Martinez, Defendant and Appellant. Court:...
Supreme Court of California Clarifies Interaction Between Code Civ. Proc. §1033(a) and FEHA's Attorney Fee Provision Introduction The case of Robert Chavez v. City of Los Angeles et al. (47 Cal.4th...
Affirmation of Competence Standards for Self-Representation in Capital Cases: People v. Taylor Introduction People v. Keith Desmond Taylor is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Restricting Supplemental Briefs in Indigent Parents' Appeals of Parental Rights Terminations Introduction In re PHOENIX H. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. (47 Cal.4th 835) is a...
Termination of Parental Rights and Adoption: Insights from In re I.W. v. Santa Clara County Department of Family and Children's Services Introduction The case In re I.W. et al. involves the Santa...
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Self-Representation: PEOPLE v. BUTLER Establishes Critical Safeguards Introduction The landmark case, The People v. Raymond Oscar Butler (47 Cal.4th 814, 2009), marks a...
Affirmation of Dennis Newton Ervine's Death Sentence Amidst Sixth Amendment Claims Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE v. DENNIS Newton Ervine (47 Cal.4th 745, 2009), the Supreme Court of...
Roby v. McKesson: Supreme Court of California Clarifies Punitive Damages and Distinguishes Harassment from Discrimination under FEHA Introduction In the landmark case of Charlene J. Roby v. McKesson...
Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County: Upholding Attorney-Client Privilege Introduction In the landmark case of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. The Superior Court of...
Reaffirmation of Certificate of Probable Cause Requirement in Appeals for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Guilty Plea Withdrawals Introduction The People v. Timothy Johnson (47 Cal.4th 668,...
First-Degree Murder Liability Affirmed in Provocative Act Murder Cases with Personal Mens Rea Requirement Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Reyas Concha et al. (47 Cal.4th 653,...
Non-Prejudicial Presence of Courtroom Deputies Adjacent to Defendants Testifying: Establishing a New Legal Standard Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Lorenzo Stevens (47 Cal.4th 625,...
Forfeiture Provisions in Employee Incentive Plans: Insights from SCHACHTER v. CITIGROUP, INC. Introduction SCHACHTER v. CITIGROUP, INC. (47 Cal.4th 610, 2009) is a landmark case decided by the...
Revisiting No Contest Clauses: California's Stance on Mental Capacity Challenges in Trusts Introduction The case of Robert L. Johnson, as Cotrustee, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kathryn A....
Voluntariness of Confessions in Death Penalty Cases: Upholding Admissibility Based on Totality of Circumstances Introduction In the case of The PEOPLE v. RICHard Allen McWhorter (47 Cal.4th 318,...
Clarifying the Application of §12022.53(c) Sentence Enhancements in Conjunction with §186.22(b)(4) Penalty Provisions Introduction The case of The People v. Daniel Laquinn Jones (47 Cal.4th 566,...
Enhanced Sentencing Limitations in Gang-Related Firearm Offenses: Insights from People v. Brookfield Introduction Case: The People v. Byron Jerome Brookfield Court: Supreme Court of California Date:...
Heat of Passion Not Sufficient for Voluntary Manslaughter: People v. Moye Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Alexander Moye, 47 Cal.4th 537 (2009), the Supreme Court of California...
Section 1170.1(f) Precludes Multiple Firearm-Based Sentence Enhancements: People v. Rodriguez Introduction People v. Juan Rodriguez is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, dated...