Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Delgadillo v. The People: Establishing Procedures for Postconviction Appeals under section 1172.6

Delgadillo v. The People: Establishing Procedures for Postconviction Appeals under section 1172.6

Date: Dec 20, 2022
Delgadillo v. The People: Establishing Procedures for Postconviction Appeals under section 1172.6 Introduction In the case of The People v. Jose De Jesus Delgadillo (14 Cal.5th 216, 2022), the...
Voluntary Absence Standards in Criminal Trials: Insights from People v. Ramirez

Voluntary Absence Standards in Criminal Trials: Insights from People v. Ramirez

Date: Dec 6, 2022
Voluntary Absence Standards in Criminal Trials: Insights from People v. Ramirez Introduction People v. Ramirez (14 Cal.5th 176, 2022) is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Establishing Specific Intent in Gang-Related Conspiracy: Analysis of The People v. Hoskins

Establishing Specific Intent in Gang-Related Conspiracy: Analysis of The People v. Hoskins

Date: Dec 2, 2022
Establishing Specific Intent in Gang-Related Conspiracy: Analysis of The People v. Hoskins Introduction The People v. Victor Ware et al. (14 Cal.5th 151), decided by the Supreme Court of California...
Adrian Camacho v. The People: Establishing Precedent on Mental State Defenses in First-Degree Murder Cases

Adrian Camacho v. The People: Establishing Precedent on Mental State Defenses in First-Degree Murder Cases

Date: Nov 29, 2022
Adrian Camacho v. The People: Establishing Precedent on Mental State Defenses in First-Degree Murder Cases Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. ADRIAN GEORGE CAMACHO (14 Cal.5th 77),...
Supreme Court of California Establishes CGL Coverage for Right of Seclusion Violations

Supreme Court of California Establishes CGL Coverage for Right of Seclusion Violations

Date: Nov 18, 2022
Supreme Court of California Establishes CGL Coverage for Right of Seclusion Violations Introduction The case of Yahoo Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (2022) marks a...
Miranda-Guerrero v. The People: Reinforcing Miranda Rights and Consular Notifications

Miranda-Guerrero v. The People: Reinforcing Miranda Rights and Consular Notifications

Date: Nov 18, 2022
Miranda-Guerrero v. The People: Reinforcing Miranda Rights and Consular Notifications Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Victor M. Miranda-Guerrero (14 Cal.5th 1, 2022), the Supreme...
California Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Sentencing Discretion under Three Strikes Scheme Post Proposition 36

California Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Sentencing Discretion under Three Strikes Scheme Post Proposition 36

Date: Nov 18, 2022
California Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Sentencing Discretion under Three Strikes Scheme Post Proposition 36 Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Level Omega Henderson (14 Cal.5th...
California Supreme Court Enhances Anti-SLAPP Protections for Public Interest Protests in Real Estate Disputes

California Supreme Court Enhances Anti-SLAPP Protections for Public Interest Protests in Real Estate Disputes

Date: Aug 30, 2022
California Supreme Court Enhances Anti-SLAPP Protections for Public Interest Protests in Real Estate Disputes Introduction In the landmark case Gregory Geiser v. Peter Kuhns et al. (13 Cal.5th 1238),...
Reinforcing Strict Standards for Gang Enhancements Under Penal Code Section 186.22 in People v. Ronald Tri Tran

Reinforcing Strict Standards for Gang Enhancements Under Penal Code Section 186.22 in People v. Ronald Tri Tran

Date: Aug 30, 2022
Reinforcing Strict Standards for Gang Enhancements Under Penal Code Section 186.22 in People v. Ronald Tri Tran Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Ronald Tri Tran (13 Cal.5th 1169,...
Express Invitation Exception to Civil Code §846: Extending Landowner Liability to Authorized Agents

Express Invitation Exception to Civil Code §846: Extending Landowner Liability to Authorized Agents

Date: Aug 30, 2022
Express Invitation Exception to Civil Code §846: Extending Landowner Liability to Authorized Agents Introduction In MIKAYLA HOFFMANN v. CHRISTINA M. YOUNG et al. (13 Cal.5th 1257, 2022), the Supreme...
Insufficiency of Evidence for Gang Enhancements in Lone Actor Cases: People v. Renteria

Insufficiency of Evidence for Gang Enhancements in Lone Actor Cases: People v. Renteria

Date: Aug 26, 2022
Insufficiency of Evidence for Gang Enhancements in Lone Actor Cases: People v. Renteria Introduction People v. Renteria (13 Cal.5th 951, 2022) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Assault with a Deadly Weapon and Force Likely Assault as Different Statements of the Same Offense

Assault with a Deadly Weapon and Force Likely Assault as Different Statements of the Same Offense

Date: Aug 26, 2022
Assault with a Deadly Weapon and Force Likely Assault as Different Statements of the Same Offense Introduction THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Veronica AGUAYO, Defendant and Appellant (13...
Analysis of People v. Villa Ramirez: Prosecution's Use of Inconsistent Theories in Capital Trials

Analysis of People v. Villa Ramirez: Prosecution's Use of Inconsistent Theories in Capital Trials

Date: Aug 26, 2022
People v. Villa Ramirez: Prosecution's Use of Inconsistent Theories in Capital Trials Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Juan Villa Ramirez (13 Cal.5th 997, 2022), the Supreme Court...
Non-Retroactivity of Gallardo's Procedural Rule Under the Three Strikes Law: In re William Milton

Non-Retroactivity of Gallardo's Procedural Rule Under the Three Strikes Law: In re William Milton

Date: Aug 23, 2022
Non-Retroactivity of Gallardo's Procedural Rule Under the Three Strikes Law: In re William Milton Introduction In In re William Milton on Habeas Corpus (13 Cal.5th 893, 2022), the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying the Mistake of Fact Defense in Specific Intent Crimes: The People v. Hendrix Decision

Clarifying the Mistake of Fact Defense in Specific Intent Crimes: The People v. Hendrix Decision

Date: Aug 23, 2022
Clarifying the Mistake of Fact Defense in Specific Intent Crimes: The People v. Hendrix Decision Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in The People v. Isaiah Hendrix (13 Cal.5th 933, 2022),...
Revolutionizing Special Immigrant Juvenile Status: Insights from Guardianship of Saul H.

Revolutionizing Special Immigrant Juvenile Status: Insights from Guardianship of Saul H.

Date: Aug 16, 2022
Revolutionizing Special Immigrant Juvenile Status: Insights from Guardianship of Saul H. Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case Guardianship of Saul H. (13 Cal.5th 827),...
Limiting Felony-Murder Preclusion: California Supreme Court in People v. Strong

Limiting Felony-Murder Preclusion: California Supreme Court in People v. Strong

Date: Aug 9, 2022
Limiting Felony-Murder Preclusion: California Supreme Court in People v. Strong Introduction People v. Christopher Strong, 13 Cal.5th 698 (2022), represents a pivotal decision by the California...
Unruh Civil Rights Act Does Not Apply to Public School Districts: Comprehensive Commentary on Brennon B. v. Superior Court

Unruh Civil Rights Act Does Not Apply to Public School Districts: Comprehensive Commentary on Brennon B. v. Superior Court

Date: Aug 5, 2022
Unruh Civil Rights Act Does Not Apply to Public School Districts: Comprehensive Commentary on Brennon B. v. Superior Court Introduction Brennon B. v. The Superior Court of Contra Costa County is a...
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Upholding Representation Rights in People v. Ng

Affirmation of Death Penalty and Upholding Representation Rights in People v. Ng

Date: Jul 29, 2022
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Upholding Representation Rights in People v. Ng Introduction People v. Charles Chitat Ng (13 Cal.5th 448) is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Expanding Civil Remedies: California Supreme Court Affirms Treble Damages under Penal Code Section 496(c) for Fraudulent Diversion of Partnership Funds

Expanding Civil Remedies: California Supreme Court Affirms Treble Damages under Penal Code Section 496(c) for Fraudulent Diversion of Partnership Funds

Date: Jul 22, 2022
Expanding Civil Remedies: California Supreme Court Affirms Treble Damages under Penal Code Section 496(c) for Fraudulent Diversion of Partnership Funds Introduction The landmark case of Siry...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert