Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Sargon Enterprises v. University of Southern California: Reinforcing the Gatekeeper Role in Admitting Speculative Expert Testimony for Lost Profits

Sargon Enterprises v. University of Southern California: Reinforcing the Gatekeeper Role in Admitting Speculative Expert Testimony for Lost Profits

Date: Nov 27, 2012
Sargon Enterprises v. University of Southern California: Reinforcing the Gatekeeper Role in Admitting Speculative Expert Testimony for Lost Profits Introduction In the landmark case of Sargon...
People v. Sanders: California Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Firearm Possession Convictions While Limiting Punishments

People v. Sanders: California Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Firearm Possession Convictions While Limiting Punishments

Date: Nov 20, 2012
People v. Sanders: California Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Firearm Possession Convictions While Limiting Punishments Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Maurice D. Sanders,...
Reining in Abusive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Comprehensive Commentary on In re Reno (2012)

Reining in Abusive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Comprehensive Commentary on In re Reno (2012)

Date: Nov 1, 2012
Reining in Abusive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Comprehensive Commentary on In re Reno (2012) Introduction In the landmark decision In re Reno on Habeas Corpus (283 P.3d 1181, 2012), the Supreme Court of...
Sanity Presumption Instructions in Bifurcated California Murder Trials: A Comprehensive Analysis

Sanity Presumption Instructions in Bifurcated California Murder Trials: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Oct 19, 2012
Sanity Presumption Instructions in Bifurcated California Murder Trials: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ahkin Ramond MILLS (55 Cal.4th 663)...
Confrontation Clause and Non-Testifying Expert Reports: Insights from People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez

Confrontation Clause and Non-Testifying Expert Reports: Insights from People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez

Date: Oct 16, 2012
Confrontation Clause and Non-Testifying Expert Reports: Insights from People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez (55 Cal.4th 569), the...
Clarifying the Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: Insights from In re W.B., Jr.

Clarifying the Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: Insights from In re W.B., Jr.

Date: Sep 27, 2012
Clarifying the Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: Insights from In re W.B., Jr. Introduction In the landmark case In re W.B., Jr., decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murder Case: People v. Houston

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murder Case: People v. Houston

Date: Sep 20, 2012
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murder Case: People v. Houston Introduction The case of The People v. Eric Christopher Houston (54 Cal.4th 1186) revolves around the horrific...
All Sums with Stacking: California Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Long-Tail Insurance Claims

All Sums with Stacking: California Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Long-Tail Insurance Claims

Date: Sep 20, 2012
All Sums with Stacking: California Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Long-Tail Insurance Claims Introduction The State of California found itself embroiled in a complex legal battle concerning the...
Prospective Application of Conduct Credit Amendments: The People v. Brown Decision

Prospective Application of Conduct Credit Amendments: The People v. Brown Decision

Date: Sep 13, 2012
Prospective Application of Conduct Credit Amendments: The People v. Brown Decision Introduction The California Supreme Court's decision in The People v. James Lee Brown III, 278 P.3d 1182 (2012),...
Interpreting the Eighth Amendment in Three Strikes Sentencing: Insights from In re Willie Clifford Coley

Interpreting the Eighth Amendment in Three Strikes Sentencing: Insights from In re Willie Clifford Coley

Date: Aug 31, 2012
Interpreting the Eighth Amendment in Three Strikes Sentencing: Insights from In re Willie Clifford Coley Introduction In In re Willie Clifford Coley, on Habeas Corpus (55 Cal.4th 524, 2012), the...
Affirmation of Constitutional 25-Year to Life Sentencing Under Three Strikes Law for Intentional Sex Offender Registration Violations: In re Willie Clifford Coley

Affirmation of Constitutional 25-Year to Life Sentencing Under Three Strikes Law for Intentional Sex Offender Registration Violations: In re Willie Clifford Coley

Date: Aug 31, 2012
Affirmation of Constitutional 25-Year to Life Sentencing Under Three Strikes Law for Intentional Sex Offender Registration Violations: In re Willie Clifford Coley Introduction In re Willie Clifford...
Harmless Error in Omitted Reasonable Doubt Instruction for Gang Offense Convictions

Harmless Error in Omitted Reasonable Doubt Instruction for Gang Offense Convictions

Date: Aug 28, 2012
Harmless Error in Omitted Reasonable Doubt Instruction for Gang Offense Convictions Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Anthony Aranda, Jr. (55 Cal.4th 342, 2012), the Supreme Court of...
Juvenile Courts' Discretion Under Section 782 Not Restricted by Section 733(c) in DJF Commitments

Juvenile Courts' Discretion Under Section 782 Not Restricted by Section 733(c) in DJF Commitments

Date: Aug 28, 2012
Juvenile Courts' Discretion Under Section 782 Not Restricted by Section 733(c) in DJF Commitments Introduction In the landmark case of In re Greg F., the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
Overruling the Common Law Release Rule: Leung v. Verdugo Hills Hospital

Overruling the Common Law Release Rule: Leung v. Verdugo Hills Hospital

Date: Aug 24, 2012
Overruling the Common Law Release Rule: Leung v. Verdugo Hills Hospital Introduction Leung v. Verdugo Hills Hospital (55 Cal.4th 291, 2012) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Life Without Parole for Juvenile Nonhomicide Offenders Constitutes Cruel and Unusual Punishment: In re Rodrigo Caballero

Life Without Parole for Juvenile Nonhomicide Offenders Constitutes Cruel and Unusual Punishment: In re Rodrigo Caballero

Date: Aug 17, 2012
Life Without Parole for Juvenile Nonhomicide Offenders Constitutes Cruel and Unusual Punishment: In re Rodrigo Caballero Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Rodrigo Caballero, decided...
Pinnacle Arbitration Enforceability in Common Interest Developments

Pinnacle Arbitration Enforceability in Common Interest Developments

Date: Aug 17, 2012
Pinnacle Arbitration Enforceability in Common Interest Developments Introduction In the landmark case of Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC, the Supreme Court...
Binding Arbitration Agreements in Homeowners Associations: Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. Pinnacle Market Development

Binding Arbitration Agreements in Homeowners Associations: Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. Pinnacle Market Development

Date: Aug 17, 2012
Binding Arbitration Agreements in Homeowners Associations: Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. Pinnacle Market Development Introduction In the landmark case Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v....
Affirming Officers' Authority to Clarify Ambiguous Miranda Waivers: People v. Sauceda–Contreras

Affirming Officers' Authority to Clarify Ambiguous Miranda Waivers: People v. Sauceda–Contreras

Date: Aug 14, 2012
Affirming Officers' Authority to Clarify Ambiguous Miranda Waivers: People v. Jose Sauceda–Contreras Introduction People v. Jose Sauceda–Contreras (55 Cal.4th 203, 2012) is a landmark decision by the...
Protective Orders and Witness Confidentiality: Upholding Due Process in Gang-Related Death Penalty Cases

Protective Orders and Witness Confidentiality: Upholding Due Process in Gang-Related Death Penalty Cases

Date: Aug 10, 2012
Protective Orders and Witness Confidentiality: Upholding Due Process in Gang-Related Death Penalty Cases Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Richard VALDEZ, Defendant...
Legitimate Distinction in Punishment for False Bomb and False WMD Statutes Upheld Under Equal Protection

Legitimate Distinction in Punishment for False Bomb and False WMD Statutes Upheld Under Equal Protection

Date: Aug 7, 2012
Legitimate Distinction in Punishment for False Bomb and False WMD Statutes Upheld Under Equal Protection Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Barry Allen Turnage, 55 Cal.4th 62 (2012),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert