Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Enhanced Liability for Aiders and Abettors in Robbery-Related Crimes: Insights from People v. Favor

Enhanced Liability for Aiders and Abettors in Robbery-Related Crimes: Insights from People v. Favor

Date: Jul 17, 2012
Enhanced Liability for Aiders and Abettors in Robbery-Related Crimes: Insights from People v. Favor Introduction People v. Brandon Alexander Favor is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
The People v. Riccardi: Establishing Rigorous Standards in Jury Selection for Death Penalty Cases

The People v. Riccardi: Establishing Rigorous Standards in Jury Selection for Death Penalty Cases

Date: Jul 17, 2012
The People v. Riccardi: Establishing Rigorous Standards in Jury Selection for Death Penalty Cases Introduction The People v. John Alexander Riccardi (54 Cal.4th 758, 2012) represents a pivotal...
Supreme Court Limits Restitution to Pre-Death Losses of Deceased Crime Victims

Supreme Court Limits Restitution to Pre-Death Losses of Deceased Crime Victims

Date: Jul 17, 2012
Supreme Court Limits Restitution to Pre-Death Losses of Deceased Crime Victims Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Paul Dean RUNYAN, Defendant and Appellant,...
People v. Lightsey: Mandating Legal Representation During Competency Hearings for Self-Representing Defendants

People v. Lightsey: Mandating Legal Representation During Competency Hearings for Self-Representing Defendants

Date: Jul 10, 2012
People v. Lightsey: Mandating Legal Representation During Competency Hearings for Self-Representing Defendants Introduction In People v. Christopher Charles Lightsey, the Supreme Court of California...
Negligent Care and Juvenile Dependency: Insights from In re ETHAN C. et al.

Negligent Care and Juvenile Dependency: Insights from In re ETHAN C. et al.

Date: Jul 6, 2012
Negligent Care and Juvenile Dependency: Insights from In re ETHAN C. et al. Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in In re ETHAN C. et al. (54 Cal.4th 610) represents a pivotal...
Clarifying the Provocative Act Doctrine: The People v. Perla Gonzalez Decision

Clarifying the Provocative Act Doctrine: The People v. Perla Gonzalez Decision

Date: Jul 6, 2012
Clarifying the Provocative Act Doctrine: The People v. Perla Gonzalez Decision Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Perla Isabel Gonzalez (54 Cal.4th 643, 2012), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Constitutional Safeguards in Death Penalty Retrials: Insights from PEOPLE v. McDOWELL

Affirmation of Constitutional Safeguards in Death Penalty Retrials: Insights from PEOPLE v. McDOWELL

Date: Jun 26, 2012
Affirmation of Constitutional Safeguards in Death Penalty Retrials: Insights from PEOPLE v. McDOWELL Introduction People v. Charles McDowell, Jr. (54 Cal.4th 395) is a significant judgment delivered...
Affirmation of Separate Punishments for Multiple Violations Under the Same Statute: PEOPLE v. CORREA

Affirmation of Separate Punishments for Multiple Violations Under the Same Statute: PEOPLE v. CORREA

Date: Jun 22, 2012
Affirmation of Separate Punishments for Multiple Violations Under the Same Statute: PEOPLE v. CORREA Introduction PEOPLE v. CORREA, 54 Cal.4th 331 (2012), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Single Punishment Precedence: Interpreting Penal Code Section 654 in People v. Jar

Single Punishment Precedence: Interpreting Penal Code Section 654 in People v. Jar

Date: Jun 22, 2012
Single Punishment Precedence: Interpreting Penal Code Section 654 in People v. Jar Introduction People v. Jar is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, decided on June 21, 2012. This...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in First-Degree Murder Case: Upholding Jury Selection and Right to Counsel Standards

Affirmation of Death Sentence in First-Degree Murder Case: Upholding Jury Selection and Right to Counsel Standards

Date: Jun 8, 2012
Affirmation of Death Sentence in First-Degree Murder Case: Upholding Jury Selection and Right to Counsel Standards Introduction In The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Howard Larcell Streeter,...
Discretionary Imposition of Restitution Fines in Plea Agreements: People v. Villalobos

Discretionary Imposition of Restitution Fines in Plea Agreements: People v. Villalobos

Date: Jun 5, 2012
Discretionary Imposition of Restitution Fines in Plea Agreements: People v. Villalobos Introduction In People v. Villalobos (54 Cal.4th 177, 2012), the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Multiple Punishment for Gang-Related Offenses under Penal Code Section 654

California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Multiple Punishment for Gang-Related Offenses under Penal Code Section 654

Date: Jun 5, 2012
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Multiple Punishment for Gang-Related Offenses under Penal Code Section 654 Introduction In The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Tommy Angel MESA, 54...
Joaquin Mena v. The People: Clarifying Appellate Rights to Challenge Denied Lineup Motions Without Prior Writ Review

Joaquin Mena v. The People: Clarifying Appellate Rights to Challenge Denied Lineup Motions Without Prior Writ Review

Date: Jun 1, 2012
Joaquin Mena v. The People: Clarifying Appellate Rights to Challenge Denied Lineup Motions Without Prior Writ Review Introduction In the landmark case of Joaquin Mena v. The People (54 Cal.4th 146),...
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Proper Trial Procedures in People v. Souza

Affirmation of Death Penalty and Proper Trial Procedures in People v. Souza

Date: Jun 1, 2012
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Proper Trial Procedures in People v. Souza Introduction The Supreme Court of California rendered a significant judgment in the case of The People v. Matthew A. Souza,...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Practices: People v. Jones

Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Practices: People v. Jones

Date: May 8, 2012
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Practices: People v. Jones Introduction People v. William Alfred Jones is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on May 7, 2012. The case...
Expanding Venue Criteria Under Penal Code § 781: Supreme Court of California in The People v. Rayshon Derrick Thomas

Expanding Venue Criteria Under Penal Code § 781: Supreme Court of California in The People v. Rayshon Derrick Thomas

Date: May 4, 2012
Expanding Venue Criteria Under Penal Code § 781: Supreme Court of California in The People v. Rayshon Derrick Thomas Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Rayshon Derrick...
California Supreme Court Limits Attorney's Fees in Section 226.7 Rest Break Claims: Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.

California Supreme Court Limits Attorney's Fees in Section 226.7 Rest Break Claims: Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.

Date: May 1, 2012
California Supreme Court Limits Attorney's Fees in Section 226.7 Rest Break Claims: Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc. Introduction In Anthony Kirby et al. v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc. (53...
Broad Interpretation of Age in Penal Code Section 288.7: People v. Michael Da Cornett

Broad Interpretation of Age in Penal Code Section 288.7: People v. Michael Da Cornett

Date: May 1, 2012
Broad Interpretation of Age in Penal Code Section 288.7: People v. Michael Da Cornett Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Da Cornett, the Supreme...
Affirmation of Trial Court's Discretion in Multi-Offense Felony Joinder and Sentencing Enhancements: The People v. John Myles Decision

Affirmation of Trial Court's Discretion in Multi-Offense Felony Joinder and Sentencing Enhancements: The People v. John Myles Decision

Date: Apr 27, 2012
Affirmation of Trial Court's Discretion in Multi-Offense Felony Joinder and Sentencing Enhancements: The People v. John Myles Decision Introduction The case of The People v. John Myles (53 Cal.4th...
Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections and Gang Enhancements in Capital Sentencing: People v. Livingston

Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections and Gang Enhancements in Capital Sentencing: People v. Livingston

Date: Apr 27, 2012
Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections and Gang Enhancements in Capital Sentencing: People v. Livingston Introduction People v. Livingston (53 Cal.4th 1145, 2012) is a significant Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert