Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Enhanced Liability for Aiders and Abettors in Robbery-Related Crimes: Insights from People v. Favor Introduction People v. Brandon Alexander Favor is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
The People v. Riccardi: Establishing Rigorous Standards in Jury Selection for Death Penalty Cases Introduction The People v. John Alexander Riccardi (54 Cal.4th 758, 2012) represents a pivotal...
Supreme Court Limits Restitution to Pre-Death Losses of Deceased Crime Victims Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Paul Dean RUNYAN, Defendant and Appellant,...
People v. Lightsey: Mandating Legal Representation During Competency Hearings for Self-Representing Defendants Introduction In People v. Christopher Charles Lightsey, the Supreme Court of California...
Negligent Care and Juvenile Dependency: Insights from In re ETHAN C. et al. Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in In re ETHAN C. et al. (54 Cal.4th 610) represents a pivotal...
Clarifying the Provocative Act Doctrine: The People v. Perla Gonzalez Decision Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Perla Isabel Gonzalez (54 Cal.4th 643, 2012), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Constitutional Safeguards in Death Penalty Retrials: Insights from PEOPLE v. McDOWELL Introduction People v. Charles McDowell, Jr. (54 Cal.4th 395) is a significant judgment delivered...
Affirmation of Separate Punishments for Multiple Violations Under the Same Statute: PEOPLE v. CORREA Introduction PEOPLE v. CORREA, 54 Cal.4th 331 (2012), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Single Punishment Precedence: Interpreting Penal Code Section 654 in People v. Jar Introduction People v. Jar is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, decided on June 21, 2012. This...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in First-Degree Murder Case: Upholding Jury Selection and Right to Counsel Standards Introduction In The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Howard Larcell Streeter,...
Discretionary Imposition of Restitution Fines in Plea Agreements: People v. Villalobos Introduction In People v. Villalobos (54 Cal.4th 177, 2012), the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Multiple Punishment for Gang-Related Offenses under Penal Code Section 654 Introduction In The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Tommy Angel MESA, 54...
Joaquin Mena v. The People: Clarifying Appellate Rights to Challenge Denied Lineup Motions Without Prior Writ Review Introduction In the landmark case of Joaquin Mena v. The People (54 Cal.4th 146),...
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Proper Trial Procedures in People v. Souza Introduction The Supreme Court of California rendered a significant judgment in the case of The People v. Matthew A. Souza,...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Practices: People v. Jones Introduction People v. William Alfred Jones is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on May 7, 2012. The case...
Expanding Venue Criteria Under Penal Code § 781: Supreme Court of California in The People v. Rayshon Derrick Thomas Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Rayshon Derrick...
California Supreme Court Limits Attorney's Fees in Section 226.7 Rest Break Claims: Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc. Introduction In Anthony Kirby et al. v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc. (53...
Broad Interpretation of Age in Penal Code Section 288.7: People v. Michael Da Cornett Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Da Cornett, the Supreme...
Affirmation of Trial Court's Discretion in Multi-Offense Felony Joinder and Sentencing Enhancements: The People v. John Myles Decision Introduction The case of The People v. John Myles (53 Cal.4th...
Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections and Gang Enhancements in Capital Sentencing: People v. Livingston Introduction People v. Livingston (53 Cal.4th 1145, 2012) is a significant Supreme Court...