Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Clarifying the Limits of Character Evidence in Capital Sentencing: People v. Gonzales Introduction In The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gonzales (54 Cal.4th 1234), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Modification of Carjacking Sentence in PEOPLE v. McKINZIE Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Kenneth McKinzie (54 Cal.4th 1302, 2012), the Supreme Court...
Affirmed: Waiver of Jury Trial Rights in Section 6500 Civil Commitment Proceedings Introduction In The People v. Christine Barrett (54 Cal.4th 1081, 2012), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
The Role of Suppression Motions and Forensic Evidence in Affirming Death Penalty Conviction: People v. Richard Christopher Tully Introduction In People v. Richard Christopher Tully, 54 Cal.4th 952...
California Supreme Court Expands Evidence Code §1108 to Include Charged Sexual Offenses as Propensity Evidence – People v. Villatoro Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Juan Jose...
Supreme Court of California Upholds Capital Murder Conviction in Keith Tyson Thomas Case Introduction The case of The PEOPLE v. Keith Tyson Thomas (54 Cal.4th 908) presents a pivotal decision by the...
Judicial Discretion Limited: Courts Cannot Overrule Statutory Disqualifications for Conduct Credits Introduction Case: The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ricardo Antonio LARA, Defendant and...
Enhanced Liability for Aiders and Abettors in Robbery-Related Crimes: Insights from People v. Favor Introduction People v. Brandon Alexander Favor is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
The People v. Riccardi: Establishing Rigorous Standards in Jury Selection for Death Penalty Cases Introduction The People v. John Alexander Riccardi (54 Cal.4th 758, 2012) represents a pivotal...
Supreme Court Limits Restitution to Pre-Death Losses of Deceased Crime Victims Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Paul Dean RUNYAN, Defendant and Appellant,...
People v. Lightsey: Mandating Legal Representation During Competency Hearings for Self-Representing Defendants Introduction In People v. Christopher Charles Lightsey, the Supreme Court of California...
Negligent Care and Juvenile Dependency: Insights from In re ETHAN C. et al. Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in In re ETHAN C. et al. (54 Cal.4th 610) represents a pivotal...
Clarifying the Provocative Act Doctrine: The People v. Perla Gonzalez Decision Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Perla Isabel Gonzalez (54 Cal.4th 643, 2012), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Constitutional Safeguards in Death Penalty Retrials: Insights from PEOPLE v. McDOWELL Introduction People v. Charles McDowell, Jr. (54 Cal.4th 395) is a significant judgment delivered...
Affirmation of Separate Punishments for Multiple Violations Under the Same Statute: PEOPLE v. CORREA Introduction PEOPLE v. CORREA, 54 Cal.4th 331 (2012), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Single Punishment Precedence: Interpreting Penal Code Section 654 in People v. Jar Introduction People v. Jar is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, decided on June 21, 2012. This...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in First-Degree Murder Case: Upholding Jury Selection and Right to Counsel Standards Introduction In The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Howard Larcell Streeter,...
Discretionary Imposition of Restitution Fines in Plea Agreements: People v. Villalobos Introduction In People v. Villalobos (54 Cal.4th 177, 2012), the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Multiple Punishment for Gang-Related Offenses under Penal Code Section 654 Introduction In The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Tommy Angel MESA, 54...
Joaquin Mena v. The People: Clarifying Appellate Rights to Challenge Denied Lineup Motions Without Prior Writ Review Introduction In the landmark case of Joaquin Mena v. The People (54 Cal.4th 146),...