Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
California Supreme Court Clarifies 'Tolling' in Probation Revocations: Jurisdiction Limited to Original Probation Period Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE v. Jose LEIVA (56 Cal.4th 498,...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Jury Instructions on Accomplice Liability in California: People v. Delgado Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Mildred DELGADO (56 Cal.4th...
The People v. Michael Nevail Pearson: Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence Introduction In The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Nevail Pearson (56 Cal.4th 393), the Supreme Court...
Marsy's Law Retroactive Application and Ex Post Facto Principles Introduction In re Michael D. Vicks on Habeas Corpus (56 Cal.4th 274) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder and Death Penalty in People v. Watkins: Upholding Jury Selection Standards and Evidentiary Sufficiency Introduction People v. Watkins is a landmark decision by the...
Substantial Discrimination Motive in Employment Termination: Insights from Harris v. City of Santa Monica Introduction Wynona Harris v. City of Santa Monica, 56 Cal.4th 203 (2013), is a landmark case...
Reaffirming Procedural Safeguards and Jury Selection Standards in California Capital Cases: People v. Corey Williams Introduction People v. Corey Leigh Williams is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
The People v. Daniel Lee Whalen: Death Penalty Jury Selection Standards Introduction The case of The People v. Daniel Lee Whalen (56 Cal.4th 1, 2013) serves as a significant precedent in California...
Expansion of Online Transaction Exemptions Under Civil Code §1747.08: Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction In the landmark case of Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Los...
Aryeh v. Canon: Establishing Continuous Accrual Principles for Unfair Competition Claims Introduction In Jamshid Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc. (55 Cal.4th 1185, 2013), the Supreme Court of...
Overruling Pendergrass: Expanding the Fraud Exception to the Parol Evidence Rule in California Introduction The case of Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc., et al. v. Fresno–Madera Production Credit...
Cedar Fair v. Nalwa: Extension of Primary Assumption of Risk Doctrine to Amusement Park Rides Introduction In the landmark case of Smriti Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (55 Cal.4th 1148, 2012), the...
California Supreme Court Clarifies Gang Participation: Solo Felonies Excluded under Penal Code §186.22(a) Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Joe Rodriguez, Jr. (55 Cal.4th 1125,...
Enhancing the Confrontation Clause: People v. Rutterschmidt Establishes New Precedent on Testimonial Evidence Introduction People v. Rutterschmidt (55 Cal.4th 650, 2012) is a significant decision by...
Non-Testimonial Nature of Autopsy Observations under the Sixth Amendment: People v. Dungo Introduction People v. Reynaldo Santos Dungo (55 Cal.4th 608, 2012) is a pivotal case addressing the...
Involuntary Manslaughter and Assault on a Child: Reevaluating Jury Instructions Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Reginald Wyatt, Defendant and Appellant (55 Cal.4th...
Strict Compliance Mandated for Government Claims Act §915 in Claims Against Public Entities Introduction The landmark case of Hope DICAMPLI–MINTZ v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, decided by the Supreme...
Double Jeopardy in Dual Jurisdiction Cases: The People v. Homick Decision Introduction The People v. Steven Homick (55 Cal.4th 816) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
People v. Schmitz: Defining the Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Searches Based on Passenger Parole Status Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Schmitz (55 Cal.4th 909, 2012), the Supreme Court...
Application of the Coastal and Mello Acts to Mobilehome Park Conversions: Pacific Palisades Bowl v. City of Los Angeles Introduction The case of Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of...