Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
The People v. Daniel Lee Whalen: Death Penalty Jury Selection Standards Introduction The case of The People v. Daniel Lee Whalen (56 Cal.4th 1, 2013) serves as a significant precedent in California...
Expansion of Online Transaction Exemptions Under Civil Code §1747.08: Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction In the landmark case of Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Los...
Aryeh v. Canon: Establishing Continuous Accrual Principles for Unfair Competition Claims Introduction In Jamshid Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc. (55 Cal.4th 1185, 2013), the Supreme Court of...
Overruling Pendergrass: Expanding the Fraud Exception to the Parol Evidence Rule in California Introduction The case of Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc., et al. v. Fresno–Madera Production Credit...
Cedar Fair v. Nalwa: Extension of Primary Assumption of Risk Doctrine to Amusement Park Rides Introduction In the landmark case of Smriti Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (55 Cal.4th 1148, 2012), the...
California Supreme Court Clarifies Gang Participation: Solo Felonies Excluded under Penal Code §186.22(a) Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Joe Rodriguez, Jr. (55 Cal.4th 1125,...
Enhancing the Confrontation Clause: People v. Rutterschmidt Establishes New Precedent on Testimonial Evidence Introduction People v. Rutterschmidt (55 Cal.4th 650, 2012) is a significant decision by...
Non-Testimonial Nature of Autopsy Observations under the Sixth Amendment: People v. Dungo Introduction People v. Reynaldo Santos Dungo (55 Cal.4th 608, 2012) is a pivotal case addressing the...
Involuntary Manslaughter and Assault on a Child: Reevaluating Jury Instructions Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Reginald Wyatt, Defendant and Appellant (55 Cal.4th...
Strict Compliance Mandated for Government Claims Act §915 in Claims Against Public Entities Introduction The landmark case of Hope DICAMPLI–MINTZ v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, decided by the Supreme...
Double Jeopardy in Dual Jurisdiction Cases: The People v. Homick Decision Introduction The People v. Steven Homick (55 Cal.4th 816) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
People v. Schmitz: Defining the Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Searches Based on Passenger Parole Status Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Schmitz (55 Cal.4th 909, 2012), the Supreme Court...
Application of the Coastal and Mello Acts to Mobilehome Park Conversions: Pacific Palisades Bowl v. City of Los Angeles Introduction The case of Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of...
Sargon Enterprises v. University of Southern California: Reinforcing the Gatekeeper Role in Admitting Speculative Expert Testimony for Lost Profits Introduction In the landmark case of Sargon...
People v. Sanders: California Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Firearm Possession Convictions While Limiting Punishments Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Maurice D. Sanders,...
Reining in Abusive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Comprehensive Commentary on In re Reno (2012) Introduction In the landmark decision In re Reno on Habeas Corpus (283 P.3d 1181, 2012), the Supreme Court of...
Sanity Presumption Instructions in Bifurcated California Murder Trials: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ahkin Ramond MILLS (55 Cal.4th 663)...
Confrontation Clause and Non-Testifying Expert Reports: Insights from People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez (55 Cal.4th 569), the...
Clarifying the Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: Insights from In re W.B., Jr. Introduction In the landmark case In re W.B., Jr., decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murder Case: People v. Houston Introduction The case of The People v. Eric Christopher Houston (54 Cal.4th 1186) revolves around the horrific...