Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Comprehensive Commentary on The People v. Daniel Lee Whalen: Death Penalty Jury Selection Standards

Comprehensive Commentary on The People v. Daniel Lee Whalen: Death Penalty Jury Selection Standards

Date: Feb 5, 2013
The People v. Daniel Lee Whalen: Death Penalty Jury Selection Standards Introduction The case of The People v. Daniel Lee Whalen (56 Cal.4th 1, 2013) serves as a significant precedent in California...
Expansion of Online Transaction Exemptions Under Civil Code §1747.08: Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Expansion of Online Transaction Exemptions Under Civil Code §1747.08: Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Date: Feb 5, 2013
Expansion of Online Transaction Exemptions Under Civil Code §1747.08: Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction In the landmark case of Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Los...
Aryeh v. Canon: Establishing Continuous Accrual Principles for Unfair Competition Claims

Aryeh v. Canon: Establishing Continuous Accrual Principles for Unfair Competition Claims

Date: Jan 25, 2013
Aryeh v. Canon: Establishing Continuous Accrual Principles for Unfair Competition Claims Introduction In Jamshid Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc. (55 Cal.4th 1185, 2013), the Supreme Court of...
Overruling Pendergrass: Expanding the Fraud Exception to the Parol Evidence Rule in California

Overruling Pendergrass: Expanding the Fraud Exception to the Parol Evidence Rule in California

Date: Jan 15, 2013
Overruling Pendergrass: Expanding the Fraud Exception to the Parol Evidence Rule in California Introduction The case of Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc., et al. v. Fresno–Madera Production Credit...
Cedar Fair v. Nalwa: Extension of Primary Assumption of Risk Doctrine to Amusement Park Rides

Cedar Fair v. Nalwa: Extension of Primary Assumption of Risk Doctrine to Amusement Park Rides

Date: Jan 1, 2013
Cedar Fair v. Nalwa: Extension of Primary Assumption of Risk Doctrine to Amusement Park Rides Introduction In the landmark case of Smriti Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (55 Cal.4th 1148, 2012), the...
California Supreme Court Clarifies Gang Participation: Solo Felonies Excluded under Penal Code §186.22(a)

California Supreme Court Clarifies Gang Participation: Solo Felonies Excluded under Penal Code §186.22(a)

Date: Dec 28, 2012
California Supreme Court Clarifies Gang Participation: Solo Felonies Excluded under Penal Code §186.22(a) Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Joe Rodriguez, Jr. (55 Cal.4th 1125,...
Enhancing the Confrontation Clause: People v. Rutterschmidt Establishes New Precedent on Testimonial Evidence

Enhancing the Confrontation Clause: People v. Rutterschmidt Establishes New Precedent on Testimonial Evidence

Date: Dec 13, 2012
Enhancing the Confrontation Clause: People v. Rutterschmidt Establishes New Precedent on Testimonial Evidence Introduction People v. Rutterschmidt (55 Cal.4th 650, 2012) is a significant decision by...
Non-Testimonial Nature of Autopsy Observations under the Sixth Amendment: People v. Dungo

Non-Testimonial Nature of Autopsy Observations under the Sixth Amendment: People v. Dungo

Date: Dec 13, 2012
Non-Testimonial Nature of Autopsy Observations under the Sixth Amendment: People v. Dungo Introduction People v. Reynaldo Santos Dungo (55 Cal.4th 608, 2012) is a pivotal case addressing the...
Involuntary Manslaughter and Assault on a Child: Reevaluating Jury Instructions

Involuntary Manslaughter and Assault on a Child: Reevaluating Jury Instructions

Date: Dec 13, 2012
Involuntary Manslaughter and Assault on a Child: Reevaluating Jury Instructions Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Reginald Wyatt, Defendant and Appellant (55 Cal.4th...
Strict Compliance Mandated for Government Claims Act §915 in Claims Against Public Entities

Strict Compliance Mandated for Government Claims Act §915 in Claims Against Public Entities

Date: Dec 7, 2012
Strict Compliance Mandated for Government Claims Act §915 in Claims Against Public Entities Introduction The landmark case of Hope DICAMPLI–MINTZ v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, decided by the Supreme...
Double Jeopardy in Dual Jurisdiction Cases: The People v. Homick Decision

Double Jeopardy in Dual Jurisdiction Cases: The People v. Homick Decision

Date: Dec 4, 2012
Double Jeopardy in Dual Jurisdiction Cases: The People v. Homick Decision Introduction The People v. Steven Homick (55 Cal.4th 816) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
People v. Schmitz: Defining the Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Searches Based on Passenger Parole Status

People v. Schmitz: Defining the Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Searches Based on Passenger Parole Status

Date: Dec 4, 2012
People v. Schmitz: Defining the Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Searches Based on Passenger Parole Status Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Schmitz (55 Cal.4th 909, 2012), the Supreme Court...
Application of the Coastal and Mello Acts to Mobilehome Park Conversions: Pacific Palisades Bowl v. City of Los Angeles

Application of the Coastal and Mello Acts to Mobilehome Park Conversions: Pacific Palisades Bowl v. City of Los Angeles

Date: Nov 30, 2012
Application of the Coastal and Mello Acts to Mobilehome Park Conversions: Pacific Palisades Bowl v. City of Los Angeles Introduction The case of Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of...
Sargon Enterprises v. University of Southern California: Reinforcing the Gatekeeper Role in Admitting Speculative Expert Testimony for Lost Profits

Sargon Enterprises v. University of Southern California: Reinforcing the Gatekeeper Role in Admitting Speculative Expert Testimony for Lost Profits

Date: Nov 27, 2012
Sargon Enterprises v. University of Southern California: Reinforcing the Gatekeeper Role in Admitting Speculative Expert Testimony for Lost Profits Introduction In the landmark case of Sargon...
People v. Sanders: California Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Firearm Possession Convictions While Limiting Punishments

People v. Sanders: California Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Firearm Possession Convictions While Limiting Punishments

Date: Nov 20, 2012
People v. Sanders: California Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Firearm Possession Convictions While Limiting Punishments Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Maurice D. Sanders,...
Reining in Abusive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Comprehensive Commentary on In re Reno (2012)

Reining in Abusive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Comprehensive Commentary on In re Reno (2012)

Date: Nov 1, 2012
Reining in Abusive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Comprehensive Commentary on In re Reno (2012) Introduction In the landmark decision In re Reno on Habeas Corpus (283 P.3d 1181, 2012), the Supreme Court of...
Sanity Presumption Instructions in Bifurcated California Murder Trials: A Comprehensive Analysis

Sanity Presumption Instructions in Bifurcated California Murder Trials: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Oct 19, 2012
Sanity Presumption Instructions in Bifurcated California Murder Trials: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ahkin Ramond MILLS (55 Cal.4th 663)...
Confrontation Clause and Non-Testifying Expert Reports: Insights from People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez

Confrontation Clause and Non-Testifying Expert Reports: Insights from People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez

Date: Oct 16, 2012
Confrontation Clause and Non-Testifying Expert Reports: Insights from People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Virginia Hernandez Lopez (55 Cal.4th 569), the...
Clarifying the Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: Insights from In re W.B., Jr.

Clarifying the Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: Insights from In re W.B., Jr.

Date: Sep 27, 2012
Clarifying the Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: Insights from In re W.B., Jr. Introduction In the landmark case In re W.B., Jr., decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murder Case: People v. Houston

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murder Case: People v. Houston

Date: Sep 20, 2012
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murder Case: People v. Houston Introduction The case of The People v. Eric Christopher Houston (54 Cal.4th 1186) revolves around the horrific...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert