Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Minor's Eligibility for Youth Authority Evaluation Post-18: Insights from The People v. Jeffrey David Black

Minor's Eligibility for Youth Authority Evaluation Post-18: Insights from The People v. Jeffrey David Black

Date: Jul 30, 1982
Minor's Eligibility for Youth Authority Evaluation Post-18: Insights from The People v. Jeffrey David Black Introduction The People v. Jeffrey David Black is a pivotal 1982 decision by the Supreme...
Admissibility of Gang Affiliation and Narcotics Addiction Evidence: People v. Cardenas

Admissibility of Gang Affiliation and Narcotics Addiction Evidence: People v. Cardenas

Date: Jul 9, 1982
Admissibility of Gang Affiliation and Narcotics Addiction Evidence: People v. Cardenas Introduction People v. Benjamin Jamie Cardenas is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Vesting of Vacation Pay as Earned Wages: Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.

Vesting of Vacation Pay as Earned Wages: Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.

Date: Jul 2, 1982
Vesting of Vacation Pay as Earned Wages: Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Francisco Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co., 31 Cal.3d 774 (1982), the Supreme Court of...
Hogan v. The People: Defining Voluntariness of Confessions Under Psychological Coercion

Hogan v. The People: Defining Voluntariness of Confessions Under Psychological Coercion

Date: Jul 2, 1982
Hogan v. The People: Defining Voluntariness of Confessions Under Psychological Coercion Introduction Hogan v. The People is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on July 1,...
Reassignment as Punitive Action: Right to Administrative Appeal Under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act

Reassignment as Punitive Action: Right to Administrative Appeal Under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act

Date: Jun 22, 1982
Reassignment as Punitive Action: Right to Administrative Appeal Under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act Introduction Robert White v. County of Sacramento et al., 31 Cal.3d 676...
Ensuring Due Process in Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Flaherty v. Flaherty

Ensuring Due Process in Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Flaherty v. Flaherty

Date: Jun 18, 1982
Ensuring Due Process in Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Flaherty v. Flaherty Introduction Flaherty v. Flaherty (1982) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California...
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Franchise Agreements: Keating v. Southland Corporation

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Franchise Agreements: Keating v. Southland Corporation

Date: Jun 11, 1982
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Franchise Agreements: Keating v. Southland Corporation Introduction The case of Richard D. Keating et al. v. Southland Corporation addressed the...
Limitation of Enhanced Penalties under Penal Code §12022.7 to Persons Who Personally Inflict Great Bodily Injury

Limitation of Enhanced Penalties under Penal Code §12022.7 to Persons Who Personally Inflict Great Bodily Injury

Date: Jun 4, 1982
Limitation of Enhanced Penalties under Penal Code §12022.7 to Persons Who Personally Inflict Great Bodily Injury Introduction The case of The People v. Eddie Ray Cole, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Partial Verdicts and Double Jeopardy: Analysis of Stone v. Superior Court

Partial Verdicts and Double Jeopardy: Analysis of Stone v. Superior Court

Date: Jun 2, 1982
Partial Verdicts and Double Jeopardy: Analysis of Stone v. Superior Court Introduction Stone v. Superior Court of San Diego County is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of California in 1982...
Due Process in Juvenile Wardship Petitions: Establishing Limits on Substituted Charges

Due Process in Juvenile Wardship Petitions: Establishing Limits on Substituted Charges

Date: May 21, 1982
Due Process in Juvenile Wardship Petitions: Establishing Limits on Substituted Charges Introduction In In re Robert G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law (1982) 31 Cal.3d 437, the Supreme...
Lipson v. Superior Court of Orange County: Expanding the Fireman's Rule in California

Lipson v. Superior Court of Orange County: Expanding the Fireman's Rule in California

Date: May 18, 1982
Lipson v. Superior Court of Orange County: Expanding the Fireman's Rule in California Introduction The case of Melvin Lipson et al. v. Superior Court of Orange County, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Confirmation of Voter-Approved Pension Tax Exemption under California Proposition 13

Confirmation of Voter-Approved Pension Tax Exemption under California Proposition 13

Date: May 11, 1982
Confirmation of Voter-Approved Pension Tax Exemption under California Proposition 13 Introduction In the landmark case of Richard M. Carman v. H.B. Alvord et al. (31 Cal.3d 318), the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Clear Jurisdiction in Bribery Cases: The People v. Diedrich

Establishing Clear Jurisdiction in Bribery Cases: The People v. Diedrich

Date: May 7, 1982
Establishing Clear Jurisdiction in Bribery Cases: The People v. Diedrich Introduction The People v. Ralph A. Diedrich et al. (31 Cal.3d 263) is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Recognition of Special Damages in Wrongful Life Actions: Turpin v. Sortini et al.

Recognition of Special Damages in Wrongful Life Actions: Turpin v. Sortini et al.

Date: May 4, 1982
Recognition of Special Damages in Wrongful Life Actions: Turpin v. Sortini et al. Introduction Turpin v. Sortini et al. (31 Cal.3d 220, 1982) is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Defining Substantial Evidence for Gross Negligence in Medical Discipline: Insights from Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

Defining Substantial Evidence for Gross Negligence in Medical Discipline: Insights from Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

Date: Apr 9, 1982
Defining Substantial Evidence for Gross Negligence in Medical Discipline: Insights from Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance Introduction The case of Joseph Walter Franz v. Board of Medical...
Independent Judgment Review Standard for Welfare Benefits Decisions Established in Frink v. Prod

Independent Judgment Review Standard for Welfare Benefits Decisions Established in Frink v. Prod

Date: Apr 9, 1982
Independent Judgment Review Standard for Welfare Benefits Decisions Established in Frink v. Prod Introduction Helene Frink v. Gerald Prod, 31 Cal.3d 166 (1982) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Retroactive Application of Punitive Damages in Drunk Driving Cases Established in Peterson v. Superior Court (1982)

Retroactive Application of Punitive Damages in Drunk Driving Cases Established in Peterson v. Superior Court (1982)

Date: Apr 9, 1982
Retroactive Application of Punitive Damages in Drunk Driving Cases Established in Peterson v. Superior Court (1982) Introduction The landmark case of Donald R. Peterson et al. v. The Superior Court...
Affirming Second-Degree Murder Conviction: Corpus Delicti and Circumstantial Evidence in People v. Towler

Affirming Second-Degree Murder Conviction: Corpus Delicti and Circumstantial Evidence in People v. Towler

Date: Mar 26, 1982
Affirming Second-Degree Murder Conviction: Corpus Delicti and Circumstantial Evidence in People v. Towler Introduction People v. Christopher Scott Towler (31 Cal.3d 105) is a landmark case...
Admissibility of Hypnotically Induced Testimony: Establishing Precedent in California

Admissibility of Hypnotically Induced Testimony: Establishing Precedent in California

Date: Mar 12, 1982
Admissibility of Hypnotically Induced Testimony: Establishing Precedent in California Introduction In The People v. Donald Lee Shirley, the Supreme Court of California addressed the contentious issue...
Family Member Exclusion and Excess Insurance Liability: Analysis of Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta

Family Member Exclusion and Excess Insurance Liability: Analysis of Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta

Date: Feb 19, 1982
Family Member Exclusion and Excess Insurance Liability: Analysis of Reserve Insurance Company v. Pisciotta Introduction Reserve Insurance Company v. John Pisciotta is a pivotal case decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert