Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Impact of "Other Crimes" Evidence on Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of The People v. Robinson

Impact of "Other Crimes" Evidence on Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of The People v. Robinson

Date: Dec 11, 1982
Impact of "Other Crimes" Evidence on Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of The People v. Robertson Introduction The People v. Andrew Edward Robertson is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court Restricts Section 473 Relief to Extreme Attorney Misconduct

Supreme Court Restricts Section 473 Relief to Extreme Attorney Misconduct

Date: Dec 11, 1982
Supreme Court Restricts Section 473 Relief to Extreme Attorney Misconduct Introduction James Douglas Carroll, a Minor, etc., v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. (32 Cal.3d 892) is a landmark decision by the...
Specific Enforcement of Plea Bargains: Insights from People v. Mancheno

Specific Enforcement of Plea Bargains: Insights from People v. Mancheno

Date: Dec 7, 1982
Specific Enforcement of Plea Bargains: Insights from People v. Mancheno Introduction People v. Mancheno, 32 Cal.3d 855 (1982), is a pivotal case from the Supreme Court of California that addresses...
Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of Education: Precedent on Equal Protection and Environmental Compliance in School District Reorganization

Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of Education: Precedent on Equal Protection and Environmental Compliance in School District Reorganization

Date: Dec 3, 1982
Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of Education: Precedent on Equal Protection and Environmental Compliance in School District Reorganization Introduction The case of Fullerton...
Private-Attorney-General Theory Encompasses Fee Litigation under Section 1021.5

Private-Attorney-General Theory Encompasses Fee Litigation under Section 1021.5

Date: Oct 29, 1982
Private-Attorney-General Theory Encompasses Fee Litigation under Section 1021.5 Introduction The case of John Serrano, Jr., et al. v. Jesse M. Unruh, et al. (32 Cal.3d 621, 1982) is a landmark...
Exclusive Continuing Jurisdiction Under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act: Analysis of Jitendra Kumar v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County

Exclusive Continuing Jurisdiction Under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act: Analysis of Jitendra Kumar v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County

Date: Oct 29, 1982
Exclusive Continuing Jurisdiction Under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act: Analysis of Jitendra Kumar v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County Introduction Jitendra Kumar v. Superior Court of...
Preserving Cost and Attorney Fee Awards Despite Silent Settlement Agreements: Analysis of Folsom v. Butte County

Preserving Cost and Attorney Fee Awards Despite Silent Settlement Agreements: Analysis of Folsom v. Butte County

Date: Oct 29, 1982
Preserving Cost and Attorney Fee Awards Despite Silent Settlement Agreements: Analysis of Folsom v. Butte County Association of Governments Introduction The case of Martha Folsom et al. v. Butte...
Mistake of Law and Felon Firearm Possession: Insights from The People v. Neva B. Snyder

Mistake of Law and Felon Firearm Possession: Insights from The People v. Neva B. Snyder

Date: Oct 19, 1982
Mistake of Law and Felon Firearm Possession: Insights from The People v. Neva B. Snyder Introduction The People v. Neva B. Snyder is a landmark 1982 decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Protection of Self-Incrimination in Psychiatric Evaluations: The People v. Arcega, 32 Cal.3d 504

Protection of Self-Incrimination in Psychiatric Evaluations: The People v. Arcega, 32 Cal.3d 504

Date: Oct 1, 1982
Protection of Self-Incrimination in Psychiatric Evaluations: The People v. Arcega, 32 Cal.3d 504 Introduction The People v. Vincent M. Arcega, Jr. (32 Cal.3d 504) is a landmark decision by the...
Establishing Collateral Estoppel for Administrative Exoneration in Welfare Fraud Prosecutions: People v. Sims

Establishing Collateral Estoppel for Administrative Exoneration in Welfare Fraud Prosecutions: People v. Sims

Date: Sep 28, 1982
Establishing Collateral Estoppel for Administrative Exoneration in Welfare Fraud Prosecutions: People v. Sims Introduction People v. June Leora Lopes Sims (32 Cal.3d 468) is a seminal judgment by the...
Ford Motor Company v. Hasson: Juror Inattentiveness and Its Impact on Product Liability Litigation

Ford Motor Company v. Hasson: Juror Inattentiveness and Its Impact on Product Liability Litigation

Date: Sep 17, 1982
Ford Motor Company v. Hasson: Juror Inattentiveness and Its Impact on Product Liability Litigation Introduction In the landmark case HASSON v. FORD MOTOR CO., the Supreme Court of California grappled...
Affirming DMV's Regulatory Authority and Employer Liability in Automotive Advertising: Ford Dealers Assoc. v. DMV

Affirming DMV's Regulatory Authority and Employer Liability in Automotive Advertising: Ford Dealers Assoc. v. DMV

Date: Sep 8, 1982
Affirming DMV's Regulatory Authority and Employer Liability in Automotive Advertising: Ford Dealers Assoc. v. DMV Introduction The case of Ford Dealers Association et al. v. Department of Motor...
Affirming Court Duty to Instruct on Lesser Included Offenses: People v. Wickersham

Affirming Court Duty to Instruct on Lesser Included Offenses: People v. Wickersham

Date: Sep 3, 1982
Affirming Court Duty to Instruct on Lesser Included Offenses: People v. Wickersham Introduction People v. Dorothy Suzanne Wickersham, 32 Cal.3d 307 (1982), is a landmark case in California...
Supreme Court of California Upholds Proposition 8: "The Victims' Bill of Rights"

Supreme Court of California Upholds Proposition 8: "The Victims' Bill of Rights"

Date: Sep 3, 1982
Supreme Court of California Upholds Proposition 8: "The Victims' Bill of Rights" Introduction In the landmark case of James J. Brosnahan et al. v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., as Governor, etc. (32 Cal.3d...
California Supreme Court Recognizes Punitive Damages under FEHA in Employment Discrimination Cases

California Supreme Court Recognizes Punitive Damages under FEHA in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Aug 31, 1982
California Supreme Court Recognizes Punitive Damages under FEHA in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction The case of Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Bernardino County (32...
Limiting Police Liability: Absence of Special Relationship and Affirmed Immunity in Davidson v. City of Westminster (32 Cal.3d 197)

Limiting Police Liability: Absence of Special Relationship and Affirmed Immunity in Davidson v. City of Westminster (32 Cal.3d 197)

Date: Aug 31, 1982
Limiting Police Liability: Absence of Special Relationship and Affirmed Immunity in Davidson v. City of Westminster (32 Cal.3d 197) Introduction In Yolanda Davidson et al. v. City of Westminster et...
Application of the Public Safety Officers' Procedural Bill of Rights Act to Chartered Cities: Insights from Baggett et al. v. Gates

Application of the Public Safety Officers' Procedural Bill of Rights Act to Chartered Cities: Insights from Baggett et al. v. Gates

Date: Aug 24, 1982
Application of the Public Safety Officers' Procedural Bill of Rights Act to Chartered Cities: Insights from Baggett et al. v. Gates Introduction Baggett et al. v. Gates (1982) is a seminal case...
Establishing Prima Facie Case in Products Liability: Campbell v. General Motors

Establishing Prima Facie Case in Products Liability: Campbell v. General Motors

Date: Aug 20, 1982
Establishing Prima Facie Case in Products Liability: Campbell v. General Motors Introduction Campbell v. General Motors Corporation (32 Cal.3d 112) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
San Francisco v. Farrell: Defining 'Special Taxes' Under Proposition 13's Article XIII A

San Francisco v. Farrell: Defining 'Special Taxes' Under Proposition 13's Article XIII A

Date: Aug 6, 1982
San Francisco v. Farrell: Defining 'Special Taxes' Under Proposition 13's Article XIII A Introduction The landmark case City and County of San Francisco v. John C. Farrell (32 Cal.3d 47) adjudicated...
Comprehensive Analysis of Forden Athearn v. The State Bar of California: Reinforcing Attorney Compliance with Rule 955

Comprehensive Analysis of Forden Athearn v. The State Bar of California: Reinforcing Attorney Compliance with Rule 955

Date: Aug 6, 1982
Reinforcing Attorney Compliance: Insights from Forden Athearn v. The State Bar of California Introduction Forden Athearn v. The State Bar of California (32 Cal.3d 38) is a landmark decision by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert